HHHOOOORRRRAAAAHHHH!!! Sony have just sent me a letter saying my PS2 will be here by 1st december. For those who don't know sony introduced a pre-order scheme in the U.K on a first come first served basis. And mine will be here within a week of launch. I'm so happy i could cry, but i wont cus that would be silly so i'm going to dance like a ballerina instead!
alphaash
11-30-2000, 08:06 PM
Don't get too happy just yet..... My friend got his, and it sucks...... BIG TIME. He feels like he has been robbed, would have been better sticking with his Dreamcast and just buying some more games. (His words, not mine). I have played it too, and it is seriously disapointing, and the DVD playback sucks ***.
Sol
11-30-2000, 10:23 PM
Originally posted by alphaash:
Don't get too happy just yet..... My friend got his, and it sucks...... BIG TIME. He feels like he has been robbed, would have been better sticking with his Dreamcast and just buying some more games. (His words, not mine). I have played it too, and it is seriously disapointing, and the DVD playback sucks ***.
What games have you played? Have you played the games that will make it worth it yet? lets say... Metal Gear? the next Final Fantasy? probably not. http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/wink.gif So dont pass judgement so fast.
SYST3M
12-01-2000, 03:18 PM
but none of those games are out yet... http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/frown.gif that's why i am going to wait for a while before i get mine.
------------------
http://www.captured.com/cctf/
Scuttle
12-01-2000, 04:19 PM
I've played SSX snowboarding, got Tekken Tag and got a demo of ISS its fantastic. How can u say its crap. The DVD also is great y do u think that its so bad.
Sol
12-01-2000, 04:40 PM
Originally posted by SYST3M:
but none of those games are out yet... http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/frown.gif that's why i am going to wait for a while before i get mine.
Yeah, but for someoen to say its crap and
and it sucks. Saying to stick with the dreamcast, well, personally, I dont like the dreamcast, but to each his own.
Housen Maratouk
12-05-2000, 11:26 AM
Well the quality of the DVD playback is actually very good, though the controls leave something to be desired (even with the third-party remotes available).
As for the games, I think they are of pretty good quality for first generation games. Do you remember what the first PSX games looked like in comparison to the newest ones? Some of the current PS2 games look better than others, furthermore, just as some PC games look better than others.
Take a look a DOA2, for example, which is one of the few games I've seen that are actually on DVD's (most are on CD's, I have found). It has graphics as good as I've seen on any console game and in most arcade games.
All in all, I am pleased with my PS2 and think most people will be. The trick will be getting one in a shortage that no one is overly pleased about... with the exception, perhaps, of thosw who are taking advantage of people who are exceedingly eager to get one at any cost.
Housen
Originally posted by Scuttle:
I've played SSX snowboarding, got Tekken Tag and got a demo of ISS its fantastic. How can u say its crap. The DVD also is great y do u think that its so bad.
[This message has been edited by Housen Maratouk (edited December 05, 2000).]
[This message has been edited by Housen Maratouk (edited December 05, 2000).]
Secant
12-08-2000, 11:02 PM
Originally posted by alphaash:
Don't get too happy just yet..... My friend got his, and it sucks...... BIG TIME. He feels like he has been robbed, would have been better sticking with his Dreamcast and just buying some more games. (His words, not mine). I have played it too, and it is seriously disapointing, and the DVD playback sucks ***.
If you are looking only at the games currently available, the Dreamcast is very comparable. If you look down the road, even as soon as January when Gran Turismo 3 hits the shelves, the Dreamcast will be left behind. Shall we take a gander at the numbers???
Dreamcast vs. PS2
Apprx CPU Clock Speed-33MHz vs. 300MHz
Polygons per second-3 million vs.66 million
Media format-prop. GD-ROM vs. CD24x,DVD4x
Don't forget the upgradability of the PS2, it was built for the future, not today. Firewire, 2 USB ports, optical audio connection, component video, S-video, 8MB memory cards, future Broadband, talks of hard drives, and on and on....
And some will say, woopee, only 300 MHz. Many don't realize that the 128-bit Emotion Engine w/ 32 RDRAM has a floating point performance of 6.2 GFLOPS!!! My friends, a PIII 450 can perform a bit over .5 GFLOPS, 12x less..........
And if you think the DVD is not as good as the typical $300 DVD player, check the specs, I challenge you to find a difference. Sure it doesn't have the bells and whistles but it works great with a controller such as the Saitek, the one I use. Now the $3000 DVD player would probably be better but.........
And don't even bash the CD player, it reads every bit of info provided on todays CDs...nothing is left behind. If you want to blame the sound quality, it is probably your receiver or speakers that are the issue, not the CD player.
Patience is virtue.....
[This message has been edited by Secant (edited December 08, 2000).]
kreidel
12-09-2000, 08:38 AM
True Dat.....they will have some awesome games real soon!
Duo
12-09-2000, 07:12 PM
Originally posted by alphaash:
Don't get too happy just yet..... My friend got his, and it sucks...... BIG TIME. He feels like he has been robbed, would have been better sticking with his Dreamcast and just buying some more games. (His words, not mine). I have played it too, and it is seriously disapointing, and the DVD playback sucks ***.
Well Dreamcast has been around longer so its games are better. Give PS2 some time and it will have some cool games.
Duo
------------------
"Maybe this world is another planet's Hell."
- Aldous Huxley (1894-1963)
alphaash
12-28-2000, 12:32 AM
One word for you guys - "Price".
White
12-28-2000, 01:07 AM
Seems like the only people sticking up for the PS2 are the people who own one and don't want to advertise how they have put their money to shame.
Adisharr
12-28-2000, 04:44 AM
Originally posted by Secant:
Dreamcast vs. PS2
Apprx CPU Clock Speed-33MHz vs. 300MHz
Polygons per second-3 million vs.66 million
[This message has been edited by Secant (edited December 08, 2000).]
66 million raw polygons.. no texturing or any other effects.. It's been estimated to be more like 12-13 million.
Also the USB and firewire ports do not work correctly according to a few mags. If you plan on making the PS2 your main multimedia center your in for a surprise. Clever Sony marketing..
$ .02
------------------
- No.. I don't know Moe..
[This message has been edited by Adisharr (edited December 28, 2000).]
Scuttle
12-28-2000, 10:24 AM
Christmas is over and now i have the full versions of both SSX and dead or alive. In reply to alphaash the price tag is huge but the game are almost up to the standard of P.C and i have 7 words for you. Metal Gear Solid two:Sons of liberty. has anyone seen this video, it is the best preview to a game ever! This is my one main reason for a PS2 and i got it now for all the good games that come out in the comming months. http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/wink.gif
Secant
12-29-2000, 01:59 AM
Originally posted by alphaash:
One word for you guys - "Price".
hehehe, OK, I see....price is the sticky point, not the fact that many wanted the system, were not able to find one, and are POed beyond belief now that they can't get the PS2 yet? January through March should be a good time to get one, IMO....
And about that price:
Decent DVD Player = $150
Dreamcast console = $150
Total = $300
PS2 console = $300
Extra PS2 controller made by Pelican = $20
PS2 games on sale at Amazon = $45
(note, the game prices where on sale a few weeks before Christmas)
3 Million vs. 12-13 Million Polygons per second.....still 4x more for PS2...I didn't realize 66 Million was the raw polygon count, my bad.
Grand Turismo 3....delayed until March now
Metal Gear Solid 2...first game that will utilize "some" of PS2 potential
Time estimated until full potential of hardware recognized by software = approx. 3yrs.......(at least what I have read)
Patience is virtue.........
And no I'm not a Sony Hyper.....X-box is going to kick their a_ _ , PS2 is a filler system for me until the X-box arrives, plus I needed a non-PC DVD player...;]
Sol
12-29-2000, 10:22 AM
Originally posted by Secant:
hehehe, OK, I see....price is the sticky point, not the fact that many wanted the system, were not able to find one, and are POed beyond belief now that they can't get the PS2 yet? January through March should be a good time to get one, IMO....
And about that price:
Decent DVD Player = $150
Dreamcast console = $150
Total = $300
PS2 console = $300
Extra PS2 controller made by Pelican = $20
PS2 games on sale at Amazon = $45
(note, the game prices where on sale a few weeks before Christmas)
3 Million vs. 12-13 Million Polygons per second.....still 4x more for PS2...I didn't realize 66 Million was the raw polygon count, my bad.
Grand Turismo 3....delayed until March now
Metal Gear Solid 2...first game that will utilize "some" of PS2 potential
Time estimated until full potential of hardware recognized by software = approx. 3yrs.......(at least what I have read)
Patience is virtue.........
And no I'm not a Sony Hyper.....X-box is going to kick their a_ _ , PS2 is a filler system for me until the X-box arrives, plus I needed a non-PC DVD player...;]
Why is X-box going to kick ***? I am just curious about a company that is developing its first system. Especially a company with such a good track record for keeping things on schedule. http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/wink.gif
Secant
01-01-2001, 04:39 PM
Originally posted by Sol:
Why is X-box going to kick ***? I am just curious about a company that is developing its first system. Especially a company with such a good track record for keeping things on schedule. http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/wink.gif
Pure opinion but here is why I think X-box will kick _ss:
1. 100 million polygons per second means it won't be outdated 2 years after purchase...the software will need 3-5 years to reach the ceiling, IMO...
2. Ethernet port built into the system, ready for your broadband connection immediately....this console could create the first major online "console" gaming community...."computer" online gaming, as many know, is as addictive as drugs for many....
3. HD built into console....able to quick load games....NO MORE WAITING on that slow, slow meter bar...no more $34 memory sticks....YES!!! Also, game upgrades, fixes, mods, etc...will become mainstream....yet now we will have to worry about "console" viruses...YUK!
4. Financial backing is almost infinite, this company has the money to hype its product into success, even if it isn't as great as it can and should be.....MS will not drop the console if it isn't making money instantly, they want to hook the consumer and will be willing to loose money to ensure this product gains mass acceptance...I don't think I have to tell any of you that Microsoft doesn't always create the best products, yet time and time again their products sell more copies than any other...hmmm......Guess marketing promotion and name brand recognition is important....Mooooo, herd-um in boys!!!
5. Software, software, software!!! Many good consoles have come and gone quickly because they lacked the software....which is the key for system longevity, IMO. Even mediocre consoles have survived on the quality of the gaming titles.....the games are what make the companys money, not the consoles. Microsoft has the best of the best (Sir) lined up and currently making the games of the future for the X-Box. They have the software industry's backing and the game programers have already praised the operating system for it's ease to program for, unlike the much more difficult PS2 which has programmers waking late at night, screaming at the top of their lungs "Damn you Sony!!!".....Ok, so I made that up, PS2 programmers don't have time to sleep...:]
6. From what I have read, X-Box is not exactly a pure Microsoft, executive know-nothing-about-gaming, force feeding, mass consumer mo-op-ly creating, jam it down your throat with useless resource absorbing bells and whistles, gaming platform....It is a seperate unit created by some brave, brave individuals who could have very easily lost their job in the fight to keep X-Box from becoming a MS mini PC...Yes it is a MS product, but no it won't be running Word and it isn't going to be named "Big Bills Gaming Box!"......The name itself scares me...;]
Talk to ya later Sol, I frequent Sharky's forums ever few weeks, hence the slowness of my reply...I don't work in the gaming industry so take my comments w/ a grain of salt, Ok, a chunk of salt....:]
Secant [RIK]
P.S. If ya get the chance, visit our Q3A TDM server running version 1.27g
RIK 1: 199.221.98.55:27960
It hit 6th in popularity on www.theclq.com (http://www.theclq.com) last week, out of 200,000 plus servers...we want to get it higher! All fun server with cheaters, team fraggers, and chat fraggers booted and sometimes banned by one of 11 server administrators.....Frag On!!!
Sol
01-02-2001, 10:52 AM
Originally posted by Secant:
Pure opinion but here is why I think X-box will kick _ss:
1. 100 million polygons per second means it won't be outdated 2 years after purchase...the software will need 3-5 years to reach the ceiling, IMO.
2. Ethernet port built into the system, ready for your broadband connection immediately....this console could create the first major online "console" gaming community...."computer" online gaming, as many know, is as addictive as drugs for many....
3. HD built into console....able to quick load games....NO MORE WAITING on that slow, slow meter bar...no more $34 memory sticks....YES!!! Also, game upgrades, fixes, mods, etc...will become mainstream....yet now we will have to worry about "console" viruses...YUK!
4. Financial backing is almost infinite, this company has the money to hype its product into success, even if it isn't as great as it can and should be.....MS will not drop the console if it isn't making money instantly, they want to hook the consumer and will be willing to loose money to ensure this product gains mass acceptance...I don't think I have to tell any of you that Microsoft doesn't always create the best products, yet time and time again their products sell more copies than any other...hmmm......Guess marketing promotion and name brand recognition is important....Mooooo, herd-um in boys!!!
5. Software, software, software!!! Many good consoles have come and gone quickly because they lacked the software....which is the key for system longevity, IMO. Even mediocre consoles have survived on the quality of the gaming titles.....the games are what make the companys money, not the consoles. Microsoft has the best of the best (Sir) lined up and currently making the games of the future for the X-Box. They have the software industry's backing and the game programers have already praised the operating system for it's ease to program for, unlike the much more difficult PS2 which has programmers waking late at night, screaming at the top of their lungs "Damn you Sony!!!".....Ok, so I made that up, PS2 programmers don't have time to sleep...:]
6. From what I have read, X-Box is not exactly a pure Microsoft, executive know-nothing-about-gaming, force feeding, mass consumer mo-op-ly creating, jam it down your throat with useless resource absorbing bells and whistles, gaming platform....It is a seperate unit created by some brave, brave individuals who could have very easily lost their job in the fight to keep X-Box from becoming a MS mini PC...Yes it is a MS product, but no it won't be running Word and it isn't going to be named "Big Bills Gaming Box!"......The name itself scares me...;]
Talk to ya later Sol, I frequent Sharky's forums ever few weeks, hence the slowness of my reply...I don't work in the gaming industry so take my comments w/ a grain of salt, Ok, a chunk of salt....:]
Secant [RIK]
P.S. If ya get the chance, visit our Q3A TDM server running version 1.27g
RIK 1: 199.221.98.55:27960
It hit 6th in popularity on www.theclq.com (http://www.theclq.com) last week, out of 200,000 plus servers...we want to get it higher! All fun server with cheaters, team fraggers, and chat fraggers booted and sometimes banned by one of 11 server administrators.....Frag On!!!
Thanks for the response. http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/smile.gif I don't think that the X-Box will fail, but one thing that I wonder, how will it compete against the Gamecube. Nintendo can throw the Gamecube in the market for $150, possibly $100. Most of your points are valid... except one thing to remember, Broadband is still not avail. in a lot of areas. http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/frown.gif I am going to play the wait and see game with the X-Box. I have had all the Nintendo consoles and I haven't been disapointed yet. yes, the N64 wasn't the greatest, but it had its moments. The good thing is, more competition is good for the consumer. LOWER PRICES!!
email_atif
01-15-2001, 01:02 PM
Wassup SharkForum Readers,
I used to have respect for Sony Computer Entertainment with their PlayStation, it was a respectable system that did quite a bit for the gaming industry (Like let some people create a game collection of one hundred games for a mere $200.) Anyways, the PlayStation2 seriously is a disappointment, I don't think the problems lies so much in the hardware as it does in the games being made for it. It seems as if developers were unable to truly use the system's "power" and therefore the people shelling out $500-$1000 bucks for this system, are, in my opinion, idiotic. Why would you break the bank for a system that really doesn't have any games that truly warrant one's purchasing it. I truly feel that Madden NFL 2001 was/is the best game at this point for the system, and the sad thing is, NFL 2K1 for the Dreamcast is just as good, if not, better than this game. I'm riding with XBox, even though I hate Microsoft, just cause its got all my favorite developers, and its got more than enough power and ease of development, we should be seeing some good games for the platform. Now can somebody guide me to the ring, cause I'm waiting for WWF Raw is War for the XBox.
Late
Cutter Da Nutter
01-16-2001, 06:33 AM
Yeah- the ps2 duznt have 2 many good games yet but look to the end of the year- metal gear solid 2, z.o.e, oni, resi.code veronica complete, silent hill 2, the bouncer, cool boarders 2001, ffX + ffXI and many more great games r gonna b released.the ps2 will be setting bvoundries by the end of this year too with tomb raiders makers capcom saying they r goonna make the in game graphix as good as ff8's FMV's-i think they cud do it. And b.s that no good peripheralswill cum out- there is a mem card 8mbs that can b connected to your p.c to empty save files onto your pc thus meaning u no longer have to traipse out to the shops wen me full. this card also means downloadable new add-ons and levelscan b put on ure p.c- then mem card- tehgen played.my ps2 arrived on 23rd of nov http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/tongue.gif so oim cool with my pre order.
------------------
You can here me but you shall never find me
Scuttle
01-16-2001, 01:00 PM
Cutter da nutter, please speak in proper English/American/whatever, it is very hard to understand *** you are talking about when you don't. I am not flaming you it would just be alot easier to understand you if you typed the proper words. Also i have bad hearing so i can't here you AND i know where you live/loiter. Mainly as you are coincidentally in the same town as me, and its a very small town, so run before i release the dogs, or i am forced to talk about fluffy things. Or even worse about Bananas
[This message has been edited by Scuttle (edited January 16, 2001).]
Sketch
01-16-2001, 04:59 PM
Originally posted by Secant:
4. Financial backing is almost infinite, this company has the money to hype its product into success, even if it isn't as great as it can and should be.....MS will not drop the console if it isn't making money instantly, they want to hook the consumer and will be willing to loose money to ensure this product gains mass acceptance...I don't think I have to tell any of you that Microsoft doesn't always create the best products, yet time and time again their products sell more copies than any other...hmmm......Guess marketing promotion and name brand recognition is important....Mooooo, herd-um in boys!!!
I have a problem with this one. It's true that Microsoft has big marketing bucks and brand recognition, but that brand recognition is in the PC market, not the console market. I'm leery of any 1st generation entry into any market until the product has proven itself, and X-Box is no different. Its going to have to show me how good it is, rather than just having some technical specs to flash around.
------------------
Despite the high cost of living, it remains popular.
Cutter Da Nutter
01-18-2001, 01:22 PM
Hey Scuttle,
how about 2p of my money 2p of your money, then we start a thread on who takes the credit eh?
n e way i agree that x-box needs to prove itself,ive seen one in game movie on bits and the only other info is that it knicked munch's oddyseeeee from ps2, also is it true theyve bought sonic the hedgehog....
------------------
You can here me but you shall never find me
Scuttle
01-18-2001, 02:26 PM
Quote:
Hey Scuttle,
how about 2p of my money 2p of your money, then we start a thread on who takes the credit eh?
CDN would you mind telling me please *** you are talking about.
In response to the rest of the topic of PS2 (which i started) i would like to say that i love my PS2 to bits and will play it forever and a day. But i still prefer my p.c over it. Why. My favourite genre is FPS, and while you can plug an Keyboard and mouse into the PS2, its not as good to play, also if you compare the screenshots of UT on the p.c vs UT on the next generation console then its not hard to see that the p.c although said to be ugly by some console magazines is still miles ahead in the chase for the best/most beutiful games in the world. Also Ps2 lacks imagination all the games bar a few are all sequels, but with the p.c you get imagination put into games, eg. typing of the dead and Stupid Invaders,Deus Ex, NOLF, Half-life etc the list goes on, the only true original game that i've enjoyed on the ps2 is SSX. So although i love my Ps2 it will never beat the might of my p.c.
Also on the topic of the x-box, i think that it will do well, mainly because anything made by Microsoft always does criminally well, i'm not critising them, well i am but not really,i will get an x-box if it looks good and has good quality in every department. I am happy with what i've got.
That is all http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/biggrin.gif
------------------
"I stopped having sex and started growing tulips" - Freddie Mercury
Newbie-Overclocker
01-23-2001, 01:14 AM
consoles suck geez they make u pay for the games like *** is that. the x-box is going to have like a 300mhz cpu 64 ram and a geforce ultra/nv20 it wont be bad but a tv is like 640X480 = SUX@r
------------------
p3 850E@1.13Ghz stable 8.5 X 133 using a fop 38
ASUS cusl2c
Voodoo 5 5500 183/183
Aureal vortex super quad
Quantum 20gig LM ata66 HD
Dual p3 600s 1 cbo and 1 cA2 @ 840Mhz=1.68Ghz
1.75volts on each
MSI dual bord
Asus geforce 2 GTS deluxe
250/397
Sound blaster live value!
p4 1.3GHZ 5 days away!
Sketch
01-23-2001, 05:21 PM
Originally posted by Newbie-Overclocker:
consoles suck geez they make u pay for the games like *** is that. the x-box is going to have like a 300mhz cpu 64 ram and a geforce ultra/nv20 it wont be bad but a tv is like 640X480 = SUX@r
What PC games are you getting that they don't make you pay for?
Xbox is going to have a P3-733 and an NV25, not a 300 MHz and NV20.
------------------
1st order OC Knight of Lord Sapasion
Although I love Madden, nothing else on the system impresses me. Oh wait, actually I love Sony's Dual shock controllers. They are unbeatable IMHO.
Minus Madden and the Dual Shock controllers I think Sony should have had a couple more top notch titles when they launched.
As it stands now everyone and their brother are waiting for GT3 and Metal Gear Solid. Its kind of depressing. In fact, its so depressing that I just spent 600 dollars upgrading my rig (AMD TB 1G, 32mbGeforce, 256MB of PC-133 cas-2 Ram, Asus MB etc).
If you would have told me in October (when I bought the PS2) that I would be upgrading my PC in January I would have laughed at you. I guess I thought the Playstation 2 would satisfy my gaming needs. The sad fact is it hasnt.
I havent given up all hope for the PS2. I still think it will be a great system. It just that right now the PC offers far better games IMHO.
[This message has been edited by jgibbs (edited January 24, 2001).]
Sol
01-25-2001, 08:33 AM
Originally posted by Newbie-Overclocker:
consoles suck geez they make u pay for the games like *** is that. the x-box is going to have like a 300mhz cpu 64 ram and a geforce ultra/nv20 it wont be bad but a tv is like 640X480 = SUX@r
I can tell from your typing skills that you are a person that deserves respect. http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/wink.gif ok anyways, why can't you have both? Seriously, there are games on consoles that aren't done very good on the pc. Fighting Games? Can you play Mario? Zelda? some of the games will not be out on the PC. Games like Final Fantasy are ported over, but that takes awhile. So, you can limit yourself to your pc, but I am going to have the best of both worlds. http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/smile.gif
------------------
"You know, I have one simple request, and that is to have sharks with frickin laser beams attached to their heads. Is that too much to ask?"
jgibbs
01-26-2001, 01:41 AM
Thats a good point Sol.
Both platforms offer some good for gamers.
Im greatful I have both.
overdriver
01-26-2001, 06:59 PM
yup. game console is all about game. I know I will buy Gamecube on launch date because of Mario, Zelda and all other nintendo exclusive games. however, I am considering buying PS2 because I need DVD player http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/smile.gif samething to Xbox. I may not buy PS2 at all if Komani releases MetalGear to different console. billions of polygons can be eye candy but it is useless without good gameplay and control.
------------------
Cooking Tbird900@1050 at 29C~38C very stable., MSI K7T Pro2A, Maxtor 45G -5400rpm, Generic TNT2 M64, Micron PC133 128MB SDRAM and modified Fop38@4400rpm with 80mm Sunon fan.
Sol
01-26-2001, 09:59 PM
If you can wait till next fall you are better off. you will see if the Gamecube and Xbox will have potential and by then, you will some better PS2 games.
------------------
"You know, I have one simple request, and that is to have sharks with frickin laser beams attached to their heads. Is that too much to ask?"
MizoU
01-29-2001, 02:44 PM
fact is 640x480 for a console sucks no matter what you are playing. I own an original PS and I loved it for certain games like Tekken, Coolboarders, etc. but now with the new pc gamecontrollers available there is no reason not to make them for the pc. But some of these games are made for consoles only...personally Id be happy without any console if they made all the console games on pc also.
I play Quake3 like a madman on my pc...I went to my buddies house who just got Quake3 for Dreamcast and was tellin me how awesome it is and how good he is at it...
I have NEVER seen anything as pathetic as seeing Q3 on a console. Man that was horrible...I feel very sorry for console only people. Do they even know how much they are missing?
[This message has been edited by MizoU (edited January 29, 2001).]
Scuttle
01-30-2001, 05:27 PM
I have to agree that people who only own consoles are unfortunate, but not pathetic. I own both a PC and Ps2, i like to use them both in different ways. For fighting games a.k.a Dead or alive, the Ps2 cannot be beaten as it is much easier. For games such as Deus-Ex then the keyboard mouse combination is far superiour (spelling). Of course, i a making these points for if you do not own other peripherals for the formats. I know that soon a Keyboard mouse will be in common use on the Ps2 and that there are game controllers out there for the PC. I would also have to disagree with some of the comments about the resolutions. True, on a P.C 600*400 is a very poor resolution, but i can hardly see the difference with that compared to 1024*800 on a game like Quake III. True the pc has less jagged edges, but remember, its the gameplay above the graphics. True, a console or any other format will sufer if its games are graphically bad. But about 2 months before the Ps2 arrived my original Playstation had completly killed itself. So in went the trusty mega-drive. The first game i plaued was the original Sonic. And although the graphics are incredibly dated, and the longevity stupidly short, it took hardly any time to comlete it. But, because the gameplay was good i kept playing it and many other games. True i still had my PC, but occasionally i need a break from it. And i will either do something useful and constructive, or i will play with my console. Why can't we all just get along? In a perfect world, both would be combined to make a super-console. But its not. Also if money is available then a console is the better option. £300 for a great console. £1700+ for a great p.c. Although the games for PC's are cheaper, does anyone actually spend over £1500 on a single games machine?
------------------
HELP! There is too much blood in my alcohol system!
Sol
01-31-2001, 10:08 AM
Originally posted by MizoU:
fact is 640x480 for a console sucks no matter what you are playing. I own an original PS and I loved it for certain games like Tekken, Coolboarders, etc. but now with the new pc gamecontrollers available there is no reason not to make them for the pc. But some of these games are made for consoles only...personally Id be happy without any console if they made all the console games on pc also.
I play Quake3 like a madman on my pc...I went to my buddies house who just got Quake3 for Dreamcast and was tellin me how awesome it is and how good he is at it...
I have NEVER seen anything as pathetic as seeing Q3 on a console. Man that was horrible...I feel very sorry for console only people. Do they even know how much they are missing?
[This message has been edited by MizoU (edited January 29, 2001).]
Unfortunately, some people cant afford PC's or keep them updated enough to run the current games. Which is where consoles kill the pcs. PRICE. http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/smile.gif
------------------
"You know, I have one simple request, and that is to have sharks with frickin laser beams attached to their heads. Is that too much to ask?"
DrWi1y
01-31-2001, 03:46 PM
Hey children,
I hate ps2, it was so hyped up and its nothing. i agree that the games are impressive and fun, but who cares that it has a dvd in it. The dvd sucks. Id rather play on the computer or wait for the xbox since its far beyond anything the ps2 has. yup yup
------------------
"Speed, and speed often." -Me
Good Ol' Pentium II 400
128Mb 100Mhz SDRAM
Voodoo 3 2000
Creative Sound Blaster AudioPCI 64D
Crappy 6.4 Gb Ultra ATA Hard Drive
3com PCI 10/100 TPR2
8x4x32x TDK Cd Burner
Afreey 12x DVD Rom Drive
17' EV700 Gateway Monitor
Boston Acoustic Speakers (Actually pretty nice)
A normal mouse - HURRAAYY!!!!
Sol
01-31-2001, 03:57 PM
Originally posted by DrWi1y:
Hey children,
I hate ps2, it was so hyped up and its nothing. i agree that the games are impressive and fun, but who cares that it has a dvd in it. The dvd sucks. Id rather play on the computer or wait for the xbox since its far beyond anything the ps2 has. yup yup
How was the PS2 hyped?
------------------
"You know, I have one simple request, and that is to have sharks with frickin laser beams attached to their heads. Is that too much to ask?"
Scuttle
02-01-2001, 05:46 PM
For those in over here in the UK. Great news the Ps2 has had a price cut! A whole £8! Wow at this rate it might be down to £280 by the time x-box gets here in a years time> Woohoo.
:Ends sarcasm:
------------------
Signatures are just a waste of time, i mean who can be bothered to come up with one?
sabin
02-06-2001, 05:00 AM
Should realize that all consoles have things going for them. Nintendo has the great characters in Mario, Zelda, Metroid etc. These are the games everyone knows. Now Sony and Microsoft are the newbies in the field. The PS2 is alright, but it should have had better game support before it came out. I have tekken tag and ssx - Both are excellent games. All other playstation games I've played (a limited amount) are bad with the except of games from SquareSoft. Price is an issue and the PS2 with DVD is excellent if you don't already have a DVD player. The GameCube will be excellently priced.
The X-Box and PS2 support cross-platform online gaming. Unfortunately I don't have access to a broadband connection so I'm left in the dark. The nice thing about the PS2 is its ability to play PS games. If you never had a PS, you can still buy games such as Final Fantasy 7, 8 and 9 and play them. This adds value and lasting ability to the PS2.
Overall the best platform, in my opinion, is the computer. There are many problems with the computer, but also many advantages. A computer might not run a game well, but you can also play games created a long time ago on the same comp, which is the system, as your new games. The computer can play games of all eras. Unfortunatley there is less and less support for PC games and more and more for consoles (Games like Final Fantasy 9 aren't being transfered across platforms). Games are good in general. If you had to pick two systems from Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft or a good computer, I'd say that you'd have to choose the computer and either nintendo or PS2 right now. We can't say anything about the X-box until people can actually buy it. I'm glad that I have a good computer, a Nin64 and my brother has a PS2. You need all the systems for the best gaming enjoyment these days.
Cutter Da Nutter
02-19-2001, 07:48 AM
Originally posted by Sol:
Unfortunately, some people cant afford PC's or keep them updated enough to run the current games. Which is where consoles kill the pcs. PRICE. http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/smile.gif
hell yeah, i say the sol is right
------------------
I'm fat, your ugly, I can diet!
Rado
03-03-2001, 06:33 AM
For all those people who think the X-box will fail because it is Microsoft's first console, the ps1 was Sony's first console too, and it outsold even the Atari (that's a fact).
Only time will tell how good X-Box does. And the reason why ps2 games are not good is because programmers find it difficult to program for it, once they understand it properly, the games should get much better. I saw somewhere that the ps2 developers provided very few DLLs for the ps2 and the programers have to make their own, making it difficult to start with.
SharkyExtreme.com
Copyright WebMediaBrands Inc. All Rights Reserved.