for all you guys that say you can't tell the difference above 30fps - Page 3

Sharky Forums


Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 52

Thread: for all you guys that say you can't tell the difference above 30fps

  1. #31
    Hammerhead Shark V5500-StillGoing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,095
    Originally posted by Oops
    that test is flawed. of course you can tell a difference between the two, one is spinning twice as fast as the other is. thats not how we would notice a difference in a game. they should be spinning at the same speed and just be rendered faster. you could easily tell the difference even if you watched that at 10 fps. so that test really doesnt show anything.
    Did you take a look at the 3d demo? You could easily tell the difference there too.


    Asus A8V | A64 3500+@2400 | BFG 6800GT (420/1100) | Corsair TwinX1024-3200LL (2-2-2-6)|
    2x Seagate Baracuda SATA 80gb in RAID 0 | Lian Li PC6100 | Asetek Waterchill 'Antarctica' |
    Panasync SL90i monitor | SB Audigy Platinum ZS | Creative Megaworks 550 | few other bits and bobs...


    Sharky's Extreme 3DMark Team
    3DMark2001 compare - 22877
    3DMark03 compare - 12921
    3DMark05 compare - 5291

  2. #32
    Hammerhead Shark SoSo09's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,122
    Originally posted by soupnazi
    Yeah, some people see things differently and aren't as sensitive to framerate differences. It's just like people who don't mind a 60Hz refresh rate or can't see ghosting on LCD. I can definately notice all 3 though.
    I'm sensitive to FPS difference; play at 60Hz; but I only see ghosting when 2 nearly opposite colors move against eachother to fast. I did have a major problem with my LCD ghosting when I first got it, but I got used to it within about 1 week.
    ____________________________________
    |::P4 3.0C:::::::::::256x2 Corsair XMS C2::|
    |::Abit IC7-G:::::::::::::eVGA GF4 Ti4200::|
    |::Creative T5400::::::::::::::::HD212Pro::|
    |::160GB WD 8Meg::::::::::::::::::MX510::|
    """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """

  3. #33
    Master of the obvious Adisharr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    A room large enough for my head
    Posts
    6,553
    Originally posted by lolinternets
    Sweet jesus you cross linking faggots.
    I wish I was a mod on days like this with captain a$$hat showing up and all..
    ...WAIT FOR IT

  4. #34
    Master of the obvious Adisharr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    A room large enough for my head
    Posts
    6,553
    It would be better test if he rotated both images at the same speed. I'd also throw in a motion blurred animation of the same thing as well and run that at two speeds.
    ...WAIT FOR IT

  5. #35
    Great White Shark vertices's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Palm Coast, FL
    Posts
    6,001
    I just can't believe that some people can't see the difference. It is so readily apparent to me it's akin to looking at 2 different colors.

    I wish I was happy at 30fps. It'd be a hell of a lot cheaper.

  6. #36
    Mako Shark rhettro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Black Mesa, Arizona
    Posts
    3,545
    The flash demo is somewhat flawed, as it isn't quite a 1 to 2 ratio or they would both spin at the same speed. The FPS exe file that you can download is much better. I'm on my work computer so I can get anything above 60FPS. LOL! It would be interesting to see what having FPS beyond refresh rate, does if anything.

  7. #37
    Hammerhead Shark Derringer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Wouldn't you want to know?
    Posts
    2,247
    The one on the right is spinning slower and the one on the left is going faster. um...I think I missed the point.

    The current rig that 0wnz:
    Antec 2650|A64 3200+|ECS 755-A2|1gb Kingston Value RAM|17" Samsung 730b|Gigabyte 6600GT|8x DVD-RW|160 GB Seagate HD|250 GB external

    The rig that 0wned:
    HP Pavilion 9800|1.3ghz P4|384 RDRAM|Radeon 9000pro 128 MB|15" monitor (12" viewable )|30 gig HD|Windows ME (Cheaper than Windows 98!)|12 DVD-ROM|52/24/52 CD-RW|Nice buttons



  8. #38
    Hammerhead Shark icecube_of_death's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,049
    Originally posted by rhettro
    It would be interesting to see what having FPS beyond refresh rate, does if anything.
    I just tried that and there is actually a difference. I set the refresh rate at 72Hz, changed one side to 72fps and the other to 100fps. The side with 100fps doesn't "skip" spaces like the one at 72fps... strange if you ask me...
    [SIZE=1.5]XP 1700+ @ 2.3 Ghz (219 x 10.5) 1.63v | Abit NF7-S rev. 2 d22 Alpha 1 Turbo | 512Mb PC2700 DDR333 | Thermalright SK-7 w/ Smart Fan II | Maxtor 6E030L0 30Gb | MSI GeForce4 Ti4200 128Mb 315/560 | Thermaltake Giant II | LG 40/12/40 | WinXP SP1

    Sharky Extreme 3DMark Team | Alpha Dir icecube_of_death of the Cooler's Guild | Sharky Folding @ Home Team

    3DMark can kiss my ***
    [/SIZE]

  9. #39
    Noob KaoTiK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    6,104
    Originally posted by vertices
    I just can't believe that some people can't see the difference. It is so readily apparent to me it's akin to looking at 2 different colors.

    I wish I was happy at 30fps. It'd be a hell of a lot cheaper.
    Nor can I, if I can't get 60fps in a game I wont play it, can't enjoy it... why play it?

    Originally posted by Derringer
    The one on the right is spinning slower and the one on the left is going faster. um...I think I missed the point.
    The point is you saw the difference.
    Last edited by KaoTiK; 10-15-2004 at 05:08 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kamakazie
    Yeah... I wasn't paying attention, I was killing trees.

  10. #40
    No, *MY* new girlfriend!~ OpStar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    6,380

    ...

    I clicked the link but I was eating Fruity Pebbles so I decided that I didn't care about fps as much as I thought, due to the crunchy sweet fruity goodness
    |i7 2600k @ 4.8Ghz|Corsair H100i w/ NF-F12s|MSI P67A-GD65 B3|32GB Corsair XMS3|GTX 780 SLi|Skullcandy Slyr|1x250GB Evo 1x500GB Evo 1x1TB Evo|3x32LN5300|Win 8 Pro|Corsair Air 540|eVGA Super Nova 1300GS|

  11. #41
    Noob KaoTiK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    6,104

    Re: ...

    Originally posted by OpStar
    I clicked the link but I was eating Fruity Pebbles so I decided that I didn't care about fps as much as I thought, due to the crunchy sweet fruity goodness
    lol
    Last edited by KaoTiK; 10-15-2004 at 06:20 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kamakazie
    Yeah... I wasn't paying attention, I was killing trees.

  12. #42
    Tiger Shark Beretta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    873
    Difference? What difference.

  13. #43
    Hammerhead Shark
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    reston, va
    Posts
    1,134
    arghh

    your gp or your hp~

  14. #44
    Mako Shark rhettro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Black Mesa, Arizona
    Posts
    3,545
    Originally posted by Derringer
    The one on the right is spinning slower and the one on the left is going faster. um...I think I missed the point.
    Think of it this way, both images should do one full rotation every second. If the one on the left is rotating at 30 fps, that means it would turn in 12 degree increments, 30 times every second (30x12=360). If the object on the right makes one revolution a second, at 60 FPS it would turn 6 degrees 60 times every second. So they both should make one revolution every second.

  15. #45
    Mako Shark
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA, USA
    Posts
    4,402
    Originally posted by Oops
    that test is flawed. of course you can tell a difference between the two, one is spinning twice as fast as the other is. thats not how we would notice a difference in a game. they should be spinning at the same speed and just be rendered faster. you could easily tell the difference even if you watched that at 10 fps. so that test really doesnt show anything.
    Back when 3dfx was speed-king (remember 16-bit color?), they put out something similar: it was a graphic of a 3d rendered ball bouncing at 30 and 60 fps. It looked worlds better than this one (yes, you can still tell the difference).
    Desktop: Athlon XP 2500+/333 @12*180, 2x 512pc3200 DC, Epox 8rda (nforce2), X800 XL 256MB, WD 200 GB, Lite-On 4x +- DVDRW
    Laptop: Dell Inspiron, Centrino Duo 1.83ghz, 1GB Ram, 100 GB HD, 256 MB Radeon 1400, 17" widescreen display


    www.russsscope.net

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •