The Official NFL Thread

Sharky Forums


Results 1 to 15 of 5805

Thread: The Official NFL Thread

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Hammerhead Shark
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Ocean County NJ
    Posts
    1,204
    Quote Originally Posted by Spank_Me_Hard View Post
    As long as the other team can't stop the pass... I don't have an issue with that. But it looked like the Raiders were actually able to contain the pass for the mostpart. McNabb completed less than 50% of his passes.

    And while Westbrook looked to have good stats, the Eagles other RB didn't. Like 2.5yrds per rush. If Westbrook is producing well on his runs... why do the Eagles even let the other guy run? Especially since it's not like Westbrook is being "overused"? This just seems retarded. When you have a guy that's hot... ride him out!

    From what I have been reading, it sounds like the Eagles are having some issues on the O-line as well.


    Jason Peters (pro bowl left tackle) got hurt early and never came back. Left guard has been out all season. Shawn Andrews (all pro guard) out for season.

    They will always loss 1-2 games a year that they are the clear favorite due to the unbalanced offensive playcalling. An opposing teams defensive linemen get in pass rush mode and ignore any run stopping responsabilities, linebackers just drop straight back on the snap. If they give up an occasional run...who cares, there not going to do it enough to affect the game.

    This game reminded me so much of the Bengals tie game last year I felt sick lol.
    Last edited by md1198p; 10-19-2009 at 02:33 PM.
    "Mister, we deal in lead." (Steve McQueen, the Magnificent Seven)

  2. #2
    Hammerhead Shark Spank_Me_Hard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Ventura. California
    Posts
    2,900
    Quote Originally Posted by md1198p View Post
    Jason Peters (pro bowl left tackle) got hurt early and never came back. Left guard has been out all season. Shawn Andrews (all pro guard) out for season.
    That definitely hurts right there. No doubt.

    But the Eagles *used* to be great at having depth at every position it seemed. They could lose a big player and have an unknown step in and not miss a beat. Do they not have that great depth anymore?
    Quote Originally Posted by Concerned Citizen View Post
    We should nuke the United States.
    i7-930 CPU w. Scythe Mugen2, Intel DX58SO mobo, WD Raptor 600GB 10K RPM HDD, 8GB PC12800 RAM, nVidia GTX285 2GB w. Artic Cooling Extreme, Antec P182SE case, Enermax MODU87+ 850W PSU, Vista 64 bit business, Xeno 128MB PCIe Killer NIC, Creative X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe, Viewsonic 28" VX2835wm LCD

  3. #3
    Hammerhead Shark
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Ocean County NJ
    Posts
    1,204
    Quote Originally Posted by Spank_Me_Hard View Post
    That definitely hurts right there. No doubt.

    But the Eagles *used* to be great at having depth at every position it seemed. They could lose a big player and have an unknown step in and not miss a beat. Do they not have that great depth anymore?
    The O-line depth is alright. Lossing 3 starters is a lot though. I believe the biggest problem in the Raiders game, and in the last 3-4 years for that matter, is the horribly inbalanced play calling.
    "Mister, we deal in lead." (Steve McQueen, the Magnificent Seven)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •