Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Motherboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

RAM Prices


Sharky Extreme : Forums:


+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: 2-2-2-5-1t?

  1. #1
    Hammerhead Shark GetCarter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    New Eden
    Posts
    2,966

    2-2-2-5-1t?

    Besides Corsair, what Brand do some of you suggest for a DIMM which can run on 2-2-2-5-1T settings?




    Ooooh, and a side question: Difference between Serial and Parallel ATA?

  2. #2
    By the Power of Greyskull Colossus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    21,140
    Well a lot of brands can run 2-2-2-5 T1 with extra voltage or within the rated speeds

    Such as Kingston HyperX, Corsair... (I like those brands alot!)

    Also the difference is connection type

    The drives are identical (except for the Raptor) to their PATA model.. Except with a SATA interface...

    I connected my 200GB WD SE drive to my SATA port (with a SATA->PATA) and the performance was identical under Sandra... I didnt test it extensively...

    SATA also only allows 1 connection per cable.. Since it is Serial and not Parallel

    Intel I7 960|Asus Rampage III Extreme|ATI 5970|12GB G.Skill|(2) Corsair P128 120GB SSD - RAID0|Water|(4) WD 1TB Caviar Black (RAID 5)|Corsair HX1000|Corsair 800D|(2) BenQ FP241WZ 24" LCD

    Home of 35TB of storage in RAID5

  3. #3
    Man With Nothing To Lose jagojago12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    6,024
    Some notable improvements over Parallel ATA with Serial ATA is that it's faster. It currently has a peak transfer rate of 150MB/sec, with 300MB/sec and 600MB/sec being possibilities in future revisions.

    SATA is also less prone to interference, is capable of having longer cable lengths, has smaller cable width to improve case airflow, supports all 3 DC voltages (3.3V, 5V, and 12V) and the best of all, it is hot pluggable. You don't need to power off a system for a Serial ATA drive to be recognized.
    Last edited by jagojago12; 07-19-2003 at 08:07 AM.
    "If everything you try works, then you are not trying hard enough." - Gordon E. Moore

    Desktop:
    AMD Athlon XP 2100+@2.31GHz (11.0x210) | EPoX EP-8RDA+ | 512MB Crucial PC3200 | VisionTek GeForce4 Ti4600 | nVidia SoundStorm 5.1 | 160GB 7200RPM Western Digital | 48x/12x/48x Lite-On CD-RW | Lite-On 16x DVD-RW | 19" NEC AccuSync 90


    Laptop:
    Intel Pentium-M 1.4GHz ULV | 512MB Nanya PC2700 | ATi Mobility Radeon 9200 | 60GB 4200RPM Toshiba | 8x/16x/10x/24x Matshita DVD/CDRW | 12.1" Sony XGA TFT


    SharkyExtreme 3DMark Team

  4. #4
    Hammerhead Shark GetCarter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    New Eden
    Posts
    2,966
    Okay, so, PATA is just SATA but allows multiple connections but PATA drives were born earlier than SATA drives, or SATA drives have been 'upgraded' recently rather.

    About the memory, beesides Kingston, Corsair, theres other brands i've heard of. Mushkin for example, but Mushkin sounds like, well, a noname brand, and the problem is theres tons of memory brands and they can't all be bad!

  5. #5
    By the Power of Greyskull Colossus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    21,140
    Originally posted by jagojago12
    Some notable improvements over Parallel ATA with Serial ATA is that it's faster. It currently has a peak transfer rate of 150MB/sec, with 300MB/sec and 600MB/sec being possibilities in future revisions.

    SATA is also less prone to interference, is capable of having longer cable lengths, has smaller cable width to improve case airflow, supports all 3 DC voltages (3.3V, 5V, and 12V) and the best of all, it is hot pluggable. You don't need to power off a system for a Serial ATA drive to be recognized.
    I thought the second gen was hot pluggable only??? Sorry I didnt keep up with the SATA, I'll wait for the new chip SATAII before I go SATA completely.. Even though I have 2 Raptors now to play around with

    Part of the reason SATA is not worth it is drive limitations... When I put my PATA drive on a SATA channel with a PATA->SATA converter. I didnt see any difference...

    So I wonder if the speed of the 7200rpm drives are maxed out and we would only see a difference with 10k rpm and up.. Such as the Raptor...

    -------------

    Yes Mushkin is pretty good.. But I havent used them before...

    Intel I7 960|Asus Rampage III Extreme|ATI 5970|12GB G.Skill|(2) Corsair P128 120GB SSD - RAID0|Water|(4) WD 1TB Caviar Black (RAID 5)|Corsair HX1000|Corsair 800D|(2) BenQ FP241WZ 24" LCD

    Home of 35TB of storage in RAID5

  6. #6
    Catfish
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    233
    Colossus do you notice any performance increases going from a regular 7200RPM hard drive to the raptors? I'm thinking 2 raptors in a striped-RAID setup, with a giant 200GB IDE drive for storage would be good for my next system. But when running the OS and games off of the raptors, does it actually run faster? Do you get slightly better framerates or benchmarks?

  7. #7
    By the Power of Greyskull Colossus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    21,140
    The game itself would not run faster.. But you would have a faster load time...

    I havent stripped the drives yet... But a single drive alone is pretty snappy...

    Intel I7 960|Asus Rampage III Extreme|ATI 5970|12GB G.Skill|(2) Corsair P128 120GB SSD - RAID0|Water|(4) WD 1TB Caviar Black (RAID 5)|Corsair HX1000|Corsair 800D|(2) BenQ FP241WZ 24" LCD

    Home of 35TB of storage in RAID5

  8. #8
    Hammerhead Shark GetCarter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    New Eden
    Posts
    2,966
    And those are SATA?

  9. #9
    By the Power of Greyskull Colossus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    21,140
    Yes the 36GB Western Digital SATA drive are SATA

    Intel I7 960|Asus Rampage III Extreme|ATI 5970|12GB G.Skill|(2) Corsair P128 120GB SSD - RAID0|Water|(4) WD 1TB Caviar Black (RAID 5)|Corsair HX1000|Corsair 800D|(2) BenQ FP241WZ 24" LCD

    Home of 35TB of storage in RAID5

  10. #10
    Mako Shark
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,360
    at what speeds?

    The Buffalo that I tested did 216 (4 slots populated, and all were 512MB = 2048MB) and I hit 216 @ the MOST aggressive timings!
    Desktop: AMD Athlon X2 4400 | DFI Lanparty nF4 SLI-DR | 2GB OCZ PC4000 EB Platinum Edition | eVGA 7800GTX | Gateway FPD2185W | 2x Maxtor 250GB 16MB SATA RAID 0 | Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS Gamer | Hiper Type-R 580W

    Coming Soon: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 | ASUS Striker Extreme Nforce 680I | 2GB Corsair XMS2 8500C5D | eVGA 8800GTX | Sound Blaster X-FI FATAL1TY FPS | OCZ GameXStream 700W | Windos Vista: Home Premium

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    460
    so what difference do these memory timings make?

    I got Mushkin ram rated at 2.5 cas.. and I got my settings now on 6-2-2-2 and I have NO idea what that means haha

    just pickin what #'s I see the rest of you guys use.. using stock memory voltage too.

  12. #12
    Hammerhead Shark GetCarter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    New Eden
    Posts
    2,966
    The lower, the better. The numbers refer to clock cycles, the lower the better.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts