Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Motherboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

RAM Prices


Sharky Extreme : Forums:


+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Expensive Sushi MechWarrior_CHI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    24

    Question How does the 9600 SE compare?

    I have a question on the low end.

    How does the 9600 SE 8AGP 128 MB card compare to the 9100 128 and the 9200 128MB cards or for that matter the 5100 or 5200 Nividia cards. My assumption is that while not as powerful as the regular 9600 it would still zoom past the other entry level cards?

    For some reason no one seems to mention this card when talking about the entry level sub $100. dollar cards.

    Thanks,
    Acer Aspire with Intel Core2 Quad 6600@ at 2.4 GHz
    2 GB of DD2 memory
    500 GB hard drive
    Radeon X1650 Graphics Card - running Vista Premium. With a Acer "22 LCD

  2. #2
    Hammerhead Shark AutomaticErik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,768
    Check out Tom's VGA Charts III here: http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic/20031229/index.html

    A quick look through the benches shows that these cards fall pretty low, sometimes below the FX5200 and R9200. In the sub $100 category, you can still find some regular 9600s which are a far better choice than any of these.
    Main Rig:
    Chaintech VNF3-250 | A64 3000+ @ 10 * 240 = 2.4Ghz | 512MB HyperX 3-3-3-10 | BFG 5900U 256MB -> 5950U | WD Raptor 36GB | Lite-On 811S DVD±R/RW

    Wife's Rig:
    Biostar M7NCD Pro | AXP 1700+ @ 10 * 200 = 2.0Ghz | 512MB Generic CAS2.5 | Radeon 9700 Pro | IBM 60GB | BenQ 48x12x48 Burner

    Server:
    Shuttle AN35N | Duron 700 @ 9.5 * 100 = 950 Mhz | 512MB RAM | nVidia GF4MX 420 | WD 8GB + 20GB Spanned Array | Iomega 8x4x24


    Buy Independent Music Online!

  3. #3
    Mako Shark mrsinster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    4,182
    sub $100
    SAPPHIRE ATI RADEON 9600 Video Card, 128MB DDR, 128-bit, DVI/TV-Out, 8X AGP, Model "ATLANTIS RADEON 9600" -.RETAIL $95 shipped.

    Specifications:
    Chipset/Core Speed: ATI RADEON 9600/325MHz
    Memory/Effective Speed: 128MB DDR/400MHz
    BUS: AGP 4X/8X
    Ports: VGA Out(15 Pin D-Sub)+TV-Out(S-Video Out/Composite Out)+DVI
    Support 3D API: DirectX®9, OpenGL®2.0
    Cable/Accessories: 1 Cable, Driver CD
    Max Resolution@32bit Color: 2048X1536@85Hz
    Retail Box (See pics for details)

    http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProdu...-289&depa=1

    =================================
    Save ANA
    http://www.jpages.net/HelpAna.htm
    =================================
    For MOM
    Save a life become a donor

    http://www.shareyourlife.org/
    =================================
    System:
    AMD Athlon 64 4400 1MB L2 Cache
    2 gigs corsair extreme
    asus AN8-SLI deluxe
    Power color x1900xt 512 meg
    soundblaster audiogy 2
    lynksys nic
    Antec 500 watt
    CoolerMaster case
    21 Inch Hitachi

  4. #4
    Hammerhead Shark nanokooshball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    'Burbs of Chicago
    Posts
    1,853
    the 9600SE is a faster card than the 9200...you shuold be able to play most game s@ 1024 resolution....but if you can get the 9600 non pro....its a better choice....
    Primary Rig
    Dell Latitude D820 || Intel Core Duo T2300E @ 1.66ghz || 1024mb PC5400 Ram || Nvidia Quadro NVS m110 256mb (Geforce Go 7300) || 80 GB 5400 RPM HD || DVD-RW Combo Drive || 15.4" WXGA Screen


    Secondary Rig
    AMD Athlon 64 3300+ @ 2.64 Ghz || 768 mb PC3200 DDR Ram || Biostar Nforce 4 Socket 754 || ATI Radeon X850 Pro 256mb @ 580 core/1200 mem|| Western Digital 160 GB 7200 HD || 48x DVD-RW

  5. #5
    Great White Shark
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Adelaide Sth Australia
    Posts
    6,829
    Originally posted by nanokooshball
    the 9600SE is a faster card than the 9200...you shuold be able to play most game s@ 1024 resolution....but if you can get the 9600 non pro....its a better choice....
    Faster than a 64bit 9200 perhaps. A 128bit 9200 is definitly faster than a 9600SE. Sometimes very much faster. In older games the 128bit 9200 is almost twice as fast while the 9600SE barely passes a GF2 GTS. And there are at least two types of 9600SE 325/400Mhz and 325/333MHz(both w 64bit memory).

    The 9600np which has twice the memory bandwidth of the 9600SE only just beats a 128bit 9200.

    It doesnt matter how advanced the core is. If it doesnt have the memory bandwidth to feed it, its worthless. A 128bit 9200 has twice the memory bandwidth. simple as that.
    Q6600 (GO), Zalman CNPS 9700, Gigabyte P35-DS3P, 4G Kingston 6400 C5, Leadtek PX 8800 GT ZL (650/1800)
    2x WD 500GB SATA, ASUS + Pioneer DVRW, Antec Sonata lll case, Samsung 226BW 22"LCD, Logitech X540 7.1 speakers, Logitech G5 mouse

    3GHz(9x333), stock Vcore, stock cooler
    3.2GHz(8x400), +0.050vcore (gaming, 24/7)
    3.6GHz(9x400), +0.150vcore (3DMark01 60769)
    3.8GHz(9x422), 1.5v min(set) (3d01 62926, 3d03 42285, Crysis High 1680x1050 34fps) Ouch! She’s hot!

  6. #6
    Expensive Sushi MechWarrior_CHI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    24

    5700 LE

    Does anyone know how the 9600 SE compares to the 5700 LE?
    Acer Aspire with Intel Core2 Quad 6600@ at 2.4 GHz
    2 GB of DD2 memory
    500 GB hard drive
    Radeon X1650 Graphics Card - running Vista Premium. With a Acer "22 LCD

  7. #7
    Mako Shark mrsinster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    4,182
    Originally posted by GB_Cobber
    Faster than a 64bit 9200 perhaps. A 128bit 9200 is definitly faster than a 9600SE. Sometimes very much faster. In older games the 128bit 9200 is almost twice as fast while the 9600SE barely passes a GF2 GTS. And there are at least two types of 9600SE 325/400Mhz and 325/333MHz(both w 64bit memory).

    The 9600np which has twice the memory bandwidth of the 9600SE only just beats a 128bit 9200.

    It doesnt matter how advanced the core is. If it doesnt have the memory bandwidth to feed it, its worthless. A 128bit 9200 has twice the memory bandwidth. simple as that.
    words of wisdom

    =================================
    Save ANA
    http://www.jpages.net/HelpAna.htm
    =================================
    For MOM
    Save a life become a donor

    http://www.shareyourlife.org/
    =================================
    System:
    AMD Athlon 64 4400 1MB L2 Cache
    2 gigs corsair extreme
    asus AN8-SLI deluxe
    Power color x1900xt 512 meg
    soundblaster audiogy 2
    lynksys nic
    Antec 500 watt
    CoolerMaster case
    21 Inch Hitachi

  8. #8
    Hammerhead Shark AutomaticErik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,768
    I'd venture to say that the 5700LE would be better but I don't have any info to back that up. I know the 5700 > 9600 so one would beleive the 5700LE > 9600SE.
    Main Rig:
    Chaintech VNF3-250 | A64 3000+ @ 10 * 240 = 2.4Ghz | 512MB HyperX 3-3-3-10 | BFG 5900U 256MB -> 5950U | WD Raptor 36GB | Lite-On 811S DVD±R/RW

    Wife's Rig:
    Biostar M7NCD Pro | AXP 1700+ @ 10 * 200 = 2.0Ghz | 512MB Generic CAS2.5 | Radeon 9700 Pro | IBM 60GB | BenQ 48x12x48 Burner

    Server:
    Shuttle AN35N | Duron 700 @ 9.5 * 100 = 950 Mhz | 512MB RAM | nVidia GF4MX 420 | WD 8GB + 20GB Spanned Array | Iomega 8x4x24


    Buy Independent Music Online!

  9. #9
    Great White Shark
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Adelaide Sth Australia
    Posts
    6,829
    A 5700LE is basically clocked at the speed of a 128bit 5200 at 250/400Mhz. If the 5700LE is also 128bit(which it should be), Its performance is simular to or a little faster than the 128bit 9200(depending on actual clocks). Here are a couple of guides.

    http://www.neeyik.info/3dspecs/ (far from comprehensive but a good general guide)
    http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/over2003/index.html
    Q6600 (GO), Zalman CNPS 9700, Gigabyte P35-DS3P, 4G Kingston 6400 C5, Leadtek PX 8800 GT ZL (650/1800)
    2x WD 500GB SATA, ASUS + Pioneer DVRW, Antec Sonata lll case, Samsung 226BW 22"LCD, Logitech X540 7.1 speakers, Logitech G5 mouse

    3GHz(9x333), stock Vcore, stock cooler
    3.2GHz(8x400), +0.050vcore (gaming, 24/7)
    3.6GHz(9x400), +0.150vcore (3DMark01 60769)
    3.8GHz(9x422), 1.5v min(set) (3d01 62926, 3d03 42285, Crysis High 1680x1050 34fps) Ouch! She’s hot!

  10. #10
    Expensive Sushi MechWarrior_CHI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    24

    Unhappy floating points

    that sucks about the 64 bit memory - I just bought this card, the only thing it says on the box is 128 floating point percision, but I assume that is different?

    Info on box off site:
    The Xtasy 9600SE, featuring ATI's RADEONª 9600SE VPU with 128MB DDR memory prosecutes your more demanding applications with awe-inspiring performance. With 4 rendering pipelines, the 9600SE processes 1.3 BILLION pixels per second. 2 parallel geometry engines, power through 175 million [T&L] polygons per second. The 9600SE, processes more than 15 BILLION anti-aliased samples per second for head-splitting performance up to 16 trilinear filtered texture samples per pixel.

    The Xtasy 9600 SE

    * 2D/3D Graphics Accelerator
    * Full DirectX9¨ Support
    * VGA, DVI-I, TV Out
    * 128MB DDR Memory
    * 400MHz DDR
    * 325MHz VPU

    At a Glance

    * Advanced anisotropic filtering,128-bit floating point color precision, 2nd generation N-patch higher order surface, integrated MPEG-2 decode, FULLSTREAM VIDEOSHADER
    Acer Aspire with Intel Core2 Quad 6600@ at 2.4 GHz
    2 GB of DD2 memory
    500 GB hard drive
    Radeon X1650 Graphics Card - running Vista Premium. With a Acer "22 LCD

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts