-
Gonna finally do it
Well I'm finally going to break down and setup SLI. I am still looking at these two for SLI:
GeForce GTX 560 (Fermi) GeForce GTX 560 Ti (Fermi)
Core Clock 810MHz 900 Mhz (v.s. 822 Mhz reference)
336 Processor Cores 384 Processor Cores
MemClock 4000MHz 4212 Mhz (v.s. 4000 Mhz reference)
Will I really notice a difference between 560 and 560ti running? Right now the most graphix intensive thing I will be doing is playing BF3. I've dropped all the other gfx stuff.
also will the PSU in my sig be enough for SLI and all my other parts?
MOBO: GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3
CPU: i7-2700K @3.5 ghz
RAM: G.SKILL Ripjaws X 32GB (4 x 8GB)
CPU COOLING:Corsair Hydro H80i
VIDEO: MSI TF 2GD5/OC GeForce GTX 760 OC N760 in SLI
HDD: Intel 320-160GB SSD
HDD: Samsung 840 250GB SSD
MEDIA: Plextor Dual DVD
PSU: CORSAIR HX750W
CASE: Antec Twelve Hundred V3 Full Tower
OS: WIN 7
10 x64 Home Premium
Monitor: AOC ,32" curved 1440p
-
bah! Now I'm told to get one good GTX card and forget about running SLI. Again, the most gfx intensive stuff I will do is BF3.
MOBO: GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3
CPU: i7-2700K @3.5 ghz
RAM: G.SKILL Ripjaws X 32GB (4 x 8GB)
CPU COOLING:Corsair Hydro H80i
VIDEO: MSI TF 2GD5/OC GeForce GTX 760 OC N760 in SLI
HDD: Intel 320-160GB SSD
HDD: Samsung 840 250GB SSD
MEDIA: Plextor Dual DVD
PSU: CORSAIR HX750W
CASE: Antec Twelve Hundred V3 Full Tower
OS: WIN 7
10 x64 Home Premium
Monitor: AOC ,32" curved 1440p
-
nuclear launch detected
radeon 7850 or wait for kepler since its right around the corner... even if you dont grab a kepler, the 560/570 should have significant price drops
90% of my PC gameplay is BF3 and my 6870 handles it fine at 1920x1080 most settings maxxed
Last edited by kpxgq; 03-15-2012 at 06:59 PM.
bitfenix prodigy, i5 4670k, asrock z87e-itx, zotac gtx 970, crucial m500 msata, seasonic x650, dell st2220t
-
I don't roll on Shabbos!
Nvidia stomps AMD in BF3, so definitely go Nvidia if you are primarily playing BF3. My 470 overclocked to almost 580 speeds on water runs 1080p with most details turned to full pretty well, but I still get some occasional lag.
I'd say wait a week or so to see Nvidia's new line of cards.
PC: Corsair 550D
4280k | Asus Rampage Gene | Mushkin 4x4GB | EVGA 780
Intel 120GB SSD + 2TB Seagate | Seasonic 660 Plat
2x Alphacool XT45 | Laing DDC | Bitspower
Currently playing: Civ 5
Last Game Beaten: Walking Dead
-
Mako Shark
I agree, so close to Kepler's launch. Why not wait a week.
GA-MA790GPT-UD3H, AMD Phenom ll 955,
Lian Li PC-60 PLUS, HD5850
----------------
Resist the devil, and he will flee from you!
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."
When thou seest an eagle, thou seest a portion of genius; lift up thy head!
2kr1b1r/Bpp3pp/1N2p1n1/4p1q1/4P3/2Q5/PPP2PPP/3R1RK1 b - - 6 15
-
Great White Shark
Originally Posted by Timman_24
Nvidia stomps AMD in BF3, so definitely go Nvidia if you are primarily playing BF3. My 470 overclocked to almost 580 speeds on water runs 1080p with most details turned to full pretty well, but I still get some occasional lag.
I'd say wait a week or so to see Nvidia's new line of cards.
Say what now? I just checked the [H] article on an XFX 7950 BE, because they use the NV 580 as the NV comparison card. The 6970 was within a few FPS of the 580, and the 7950 was several FPS faster than the 580 in BF3.
If the new NV cards are just around the corner, then he could by all means wait, but to say NV stomps AMD in BF3 is blatantly untrue.
Prince of the OC Crusaders
Intel i7 3.2GHz @ 4.24GHz
Cooler Master V8
Asus P9X79 Pro
16GB Patriot Viper Extreme DDR3-1600 (quad channel)
HIS R9 290X @1050MHz
Asus 20x DVD-RW DL DVD-RW
-
I don't roll on Shabbos!
Originally Posted by Un4given
Say what now? I just checked the [H] article on an XFX 7950 BE, because they use the NV 580 as the NV comparison card. The 6970 was within a few FPS of the 580, and the 7950 was several FPS faster than the 580 in BF3.
If the new NV cards are just around the corner, then he could by all means wait, but to say NV stomps AMD in BF3 is blatantly untrue.
Check these out:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5476/a...7950-review/12
580 is 10fps ahead of the 6970 at 1080p, or around 25% faster. [H]'s articles are kind of confusing sometimes because they don't do Apples to Apples comparisons until the very bottom of the page. They do "highest playable settings" benchmarks which I find useless.
PC: Corsair 550D
4280k | Asus Rampage Gene | Mushkin 4x4GB | EVGA 780
Intel 120GB SSD + 2TB Seagate | Seasonic 660 Plat
2x Alphacool XT45 | Laing DDC | Bitspower
Currently playing: Civ 5
Last Game Beaten: Walking Dead
-
Mako Shark
Stomping is a big word, the 580 is winning but not by that much. If I had to buy a card
this day it would be a 7950 over a 580. Even for bf3. It is a superior architecture(newer) that probably will scale better with future titles.
It will be interesting to see how the expansions pack will benchark in about 4 month time.
Knowing that Kepler is almost here, I would wait.
That is exactly what I have been doing after the disapointing 79xx results
GA-MA790GPT-UD3H, AMD Phenom ll 955,
Lian Li PC-60 PLUS, HD5850
----------------
Resist the devil, and he will flee from you!
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."
When thou seest an eagle, thou seest a portion of genius; lift up thy head!
2kr1b1r/Bpp3pp/1N2p1n1/4p1q1/4P3/2Q5/PPP2PPP/3R1RK1 b - - 6 15
-
I don't roll on Shabbos!
Originally Posted by Learux
Stomping is a big word, the 580 is winning but not by that much. If I had to buy a card
this day it would be a 7950 over a 580. Even for bf3. It is a superior architecture(newer) that probably will scale better with future titles.
It will be interesting to see how the expansions pack will benchark in about 4 month time.
Knowing that Kepler is almost here, I would wait.
That is exactly what I have been doing after the disapointing 79xx results
My original post was geared at the lower end cards. Kujoe is not looking at a 580, so I don't really know why Un4given brought that up. The 560TI can be had for 180-200 dollars. AMD can not compete with that card with their current line up at that price point. The 7850 isn't even out yet, so that's moot as well.
The 560TI gives a respectible 50fps at 1080p with high settings for only 180-200 dollars. It is hard to beat that. The 7850 edges it out, but it costs at least 250. For 250 you can get a 480GTX which is a fantastic bargain if he has the PSU to support it.
This is what I would get:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814130759
PC: Corsair 550D
4280k | Asus Rampage Gene | Mushkin 4x4GB | EVGA 780
Intel 120GB SSD + 2TB Seagate | Seasonic 660 Plat
2x Alphacool XT45 | Laing DDC | Bitspower
Currently playing: Civ 5
Last Game Beaten: Walking Dead
-
nuclear launch detected
to me, the power efficiency of the radeon cards are worth the price premium... if i wanted the best performance for the money regardless of power efficiency, would probably do Geforce GTX460 SLI or Radeon 5770/6770 XFire for about $150-200 and call it a day
bitfenix prodigy, i5 4670k, asrock z87e-itx, zotac gtx 970, crucial m500 msata, seasonic x650, dell st2220t
-
Originally Posted by Timman_24
It's odd how that one seems to have better specs then the later video cards within the 250-300 price range. Seems like anything better will be out of that price range. Even the 570 cards within the same price bracket (250-300) don't seem to be as good. Mistake on Nvidias part?
Last edited by kujoe2002; 03-18-2012 at 01:17 PM.
MOBO: GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3
CPU: i7-2700K @3.5 ghz
RAM: G.SKILL Ripjaws X 32GB (4 x 8GB)
CPU COOLING:Corsair Hydro H80i
VIDEO: MSI TF 2GD5/OC GeForce GTX 760 OC N760 in SLI
HDD: Intel 320-160GB SSD
HDD: Samsung 840 250GB SSD
MEDIA: Plextor Dual DVD
PSU: CORSAIR HX750W
CASE: Antec Twelve Hundred V3 Full Tower
OS: WIN 7
10 x64 Home Premium
Monitor: AOC ,32" curved 1440p
-
No, *MY* new girlfriend!~
Just old so they're cheap to sell through them. Definitely a steal for $250 though.
|i7 2600k @ 4.8Ghz|Corsair H100i w/ NF-F12s|MSI P67A-GD65 B3|32GB Corsair XMS3|GTX 780 SLi|Skullcandy Slyr|1x250GB Evo 1x500GB Evo 1x1TB Evo|3x32LN5300|Win 8 Pro|Corsair Air 540|eVGA Super Nova 1300GS|
-
I'm not limiting myself to Nvidia. I forgot to mention it. I was looking at all video cards. If I'm not going to use any extreme graphics intensive programs (other then Battlefield 3), I figure SLI/Crossfire is a waste. I was looking at video cards and did a comparison if Nvidia with ATI and wanted to know your thoughts on this:
XFX Double D HD-687A-ZDFC Radeon HD 6870
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814150521
It actually seems to have better specs then all of the Nvidia cards and it's less than 200.
The bottom line is, I am willing to spend up to $280.00 (without shipping) and wanted to know the best card for that. My PSU is a 750W. I figure since I'll be only getting ONE video card (since SLI/Crossfire) won't be tapped into, I wanted your thoughts on what the best video card for that price is out there now.
So right now, I have that Radeon HD 6870 and the GTX 480.
MOBO: GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3
CPU: i7-2700K @3.5 ghz
RAM: G.SKILL Ripjaws X 32GB (4 x 8GB)
CPU COOLING:Corsair Hydro H80i
VIDEO: MSI TF 2GD5/OC GeForce GTX 760 OC N760 in SLI
HDD: Intel 320-160GB SSD
HDD: Samsung 840 250GB SSD
MEDIA: Plextor Dual DVD
PSU: CORSAIR HX750W
CASE: Antec Twelve Hundred V3 Full Tower
OS: WIN 7
10 x64 Home Premium
Monitor: AOC ,32" curved 1440p
-
Mako Shark
What resolution will you be playing bf3 in.?
I hope you realize that when you say you will
not be doing very graphic intense programs, bf3 should not be in that sentence.
Either card will be fine just realize you will have to sacrifice reolution and/or IQ settings
That 6870 is very similar to my overclocked 5850. I can play in 1920x1080 at medium settings very well. Average >60fps
Switching to high settings degrades performance too much for me to play.
Last edited by Learux; 03-19-2012 at 08:15 PM.
GA-MA790GPT-UD3H, AMD Phenom ll 955,
Lian Li PC-60 PLUS, HD5850
----------------
Resist the devil, and he will flee from you!
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."
When thou seest an eagle, thou seest a portion of genius; lift up thy head!
2kr1b1r/Bpp3pp/1N2p1n1/4p1q1/4P3/2Q5/PPP2PPP/3R1RK1 b - - 6 15
-
Well my monitor is the Westinghouse 32" LCD monitor: with the specs:
Picture Quality
Screen Size: 31.5″ Diagonal
Native Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Aspect Ratio: 16:9
Contrast Ratio: 6000:1
Viewing Angle: Horizontal 176° / Vertical 176°
Compatible Modes
TV Tuner Capability*: NTSC/ATSC
YPbPr: 480i, 480p, 720p, 1080i, 1080p
HDMI: 480i, 480p, 720p, 1080i, 1080p
PC: SVGA, XGA, WXGA
Optimum Resolution: 1920 x 1080
I'd like to play smooth with high graphics or medium graphics. I know that what your monitor can do has a lot to do with how much you can get out of your video card. I don't see getting a new monitor. So, what's the final verdict? What video card would you get if you had $280.00 to use (not including shipping)??
MOBO: GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3
CPU: i7-2700K @3.5 ghz
RAM: G.SKILL Ripjaws X 32GB (4 x 8GB)
CPU COOLING:Corsair Hydro H80i
VIDEO: MSI TF 2GD5/OC GeForce GTX 760 OC N760 in SLI
HDD: Intel 320-160GB SSD
HDD: Samsung 840 250GB SSD
MEDIA: Plextor Dual DVD
PSU: CORSAIR HX750W
CASE: Antec Twelve Hundred V3 Full Tower
OS: WIN 7
10 x64 Home Premium
Monitor: AOC ,32" curved 1440p
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|