I dug up an old 320 gig drive and I want to partition it so I can install Windows 7 and Linux. The only reason for Windows 7 will be DX11. I have three 1TB NTFS drives in the system so storage will not be an issue on the boot drive.
If not planning on storing anything on the OS drive, simply do 50/50. If you have the desire, you can also use ext3 vs. ext4. That way, both systems could see both partitions. (Using an ext2 driver for windows,for example.)
Crusader for the 64-bit Era.
New Rule: 2GB per core, minimum.
Ans: How should I partition this drive. Reply to Thread
Hi drdoom,
Before you partition and format your hard disk, make sure that you do the following:
If you are using a SATA hard disk, skip this step and go to the "Determine the type of file system that you want to use" section. If you are using an IDE hard disk, set the jumpers and the cabling according to the role of the hard disk (for example, master or subordinate) and make any required BIOS (or CMOS) changes. To set the jumpers and cabling, and make any required BIOS or CMOS changes, see the documentation that was included with your hard disk and motherboard, or contact the manufacturers.
You can use either the NTFS or FAT file systems.
If the hard disk already contains data, back it up
If the hard disk has a drive overlay or a disk management program, make sure that it is compatible
If you have software that you want to reinstall, verify that you have the disks
You can use the Windows XP Setup program to partition and format the hard disk.
You can use your operating system disk to make partition. Before you partition and format your hard disk, make sure that you do the following: Prepare the hard disk according to the manufacturer's instructions Determine the type of file system that you want to use.
If the hard disk already contains data, back it up. If the hard disk has a drive overlay or a disk management program, make sure that it is compatible
If not planning on storing anything on the OS drive, simply do 50/50. If you have the desire, you can also use ext3 vs. ext4. That way, both systems could see both partitions. (Using an ext2 driver for windows,for example.)
I'm using some freeware partition software and it give the option of NTFS, ext3 and ext4 as the file system. Which would give both Linux access to Windows but not the other way around and which gives both OS's access?
I have ubuntu on a 500GB SATA HDD (disk 2) partitioned to hold win 8 and mint as well. They all (but mint show up fine on the boot. I setup a 50GB partition for ubuntu as NTFS. It runs fine. It only took 3.2GB of the 50GB I partitioned. If the HDD is 320, this is what I would do:
part (x): 80GB NTFS Ubuntu
Part (x): 200GB NTFS Win 7
rest setup as data sector or free space. You can change the 80 to 120 (true 120GB) incase you think you are going to install many programs on ubuntu. If you are going to run a lot of programs on ubuntu, then I would run two partitions both at NTFS split equally (roughly 160 GB each)
Last edited by kujoe2002; 04-04-2012 at 07:58 PM.
MOBO: Biostar TZ68K+ Intel Z68 ATX CPU: Intel Core i7-2700K RAM: G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) CPU COOLING:Corsair Hydro Series H80 VIDEO: MSI TWIN FROZR II GeForce GTX 570 HDD: Intel 320-160GB SSD HDD: 250GB WD SATA HDD: 1TB WD SATA HDD: 500WD SATA MEDIA: Plextor Dual DVD PSU: CORSAIR HX750 750W CASE: Antec Twelve Hundred V3 ATX Full Tower OS: WIN 7 x64 Home Premium Monitor: Westinghouse 32" LCD 1080p
Personally, I wouldn't plan on running any Linux in the long term off of an NTFS r/w partition as the boot/root partition. Maybe that's FUD talking, but I've seen way too many linux systems eat NTFS partitions after they have been heavily used.
Crusader for the 64-bit Era.
New Rule: 2GB per core, minimum.
Installing linux to an NTFS partition sounds like a bad idea all around. Quick googling didn't come up with much, but I assume if it's working for Ubuntu they're doing a wubi style install and you're basically wrapping up a virtual disk on top of the ntfs partition. NTFS doesn't store the proper metadata to handle linux permissions and file access entries.
I have ubuntu on a 500GB SATA HDD (disk 2) partitioned to hold win 8 and mint as well. They all (but mint show up fine on the boot. I setup a 50GB partition for ubuntu as NTFS. It runs fine. It only took 3.2GB of the 50GB I partitioned. If the HDD is 320, this is what I would do:
part (x): 80GB NTFS Ubuntu
Part (x): 200GB NTFS Win 7
rest setup as data sector or free space. You can change the 80 to 120 (true 120GB) incase you think you are going to install many programs on ubuntu. If you are going to run a lot of programs on ubuntu, then I would run two partitions both at NTFS split equally (roughly 160 GB each)
I want to give Linux as much dedicated space as possible since Win7 will be a secondary OS. Storage space for Win7 will not be a problem since the computer has 3 other NTFS 1Tb drives. One of them has a 75gig WinXP OS partition. All other space is for storage. Would 100Gb be sufficient for Win7?
Installing linux to an NTFS partition sounds like a bad idea all around. Quick googling didn't come up with much, but I assume if it's working for Ubuntu they're doing a wubi style install and you're basically wrapping up a virtual disk on top of the ntfs partition. NTFS doesn't store the proper metadata to handle linux permissions and file access entries.
Bookmarks