LGA 2011 CPU or LGA 1155 - which is faster?

Sharky Forums


Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: LGA 2011 CPU or LGA 1155 - which is faster?

  1. #1
    Goldfish Pentium691's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    School
    Posts
    52

    LGA 2011 CPU or LGA 1155 - which is faster?

    I am thinking of getting a X-79 LGA 2011 motherboard, and I am looking at getting the Intel Core i7-3820 which is about $300.

    Do you think the i7-3820 LGA 2011 and a top-end mobo, would be faster than a Core i7-2600K LGA 1155 and a top-end motherboard?

    The LGA 1155 combo would be about $50 cheeper, but would the LGA 2011 combo be faster?
    No Pentium yet!!!

    CPU : AMD FX-56
    Mobo: ABIT KN9 SLI
    Mem : 2 x 512 Kingston
    GPU : ATI 850XT
    SND : Fatal1ty FPS X-FI by Creative
    HDD : Barrucuda SATA 200Gb
    KEY : Fatal1ty
    MOS : MS Laser

  2. #2
    I don't roll on Shabbos! Timman_24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Urbana, IL
    Posts
    12,648
    Depends on what you want. The 2600k will be faster in games when overclocked to 4.4Ghz. The 2011 sockets shine with highly threaded programs. Unless you go for the 500+ dollar 2011 chips then there isn't a reason to go with that socket.
    PC: Corsair 550D
    4280k | Asus Rampage Gene | Mushkin 4x4GB | EVGA 780
    Intel 120GB SSD + 2TB Seagate | Seasonic 660 Plat
    2x Alphacool XT45 | Laing DDC | Bitspower

    Currently playing: Civ 5
    Last Game Beaten: Walking Dead

  3. #3
    Defiant Shark Johnmcl7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    6,433
    I agree, it doesn't seem worth going with LGA-2011 if only for quad core:

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/5276/i...ndy-bridge-e/5

    John

    Alienware Aurora R4 (i7 3930K), Dell Studio XPS (i7 940), XPS M1330, Studio XPS 1640 (RGB LED 1080p), XPS M1730, Sony UX1XN, TX1HP, Lenovo X200

  4. #4
    Great White Shark
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Alpharetta, Denial, Only certain songs.
    Posts
    9,779
    Quad channel memory and more PCIe lanes definitely qualify it as "faster" from a purely numbers based standpoint (more bandwidth), but in real world use, especially for single user tasks it isn't worth the extra cost, heat, and power consumption.

    Crusader for the 64-bit Era.
    New Rule: 2GB per core, minimum.

    Intel i7-2600K | Asus P8Z77-V | Samsung 840 Pro 256GB SSD
    16GB PC3-12800 Kingston DDR3 | PNY GTX 570
    Fractal Arc Midi |Seasonic X650 PSU | Klipsch ProMedia 5.1 Ultra | Windows 8.1 Pro x64

  5. #5
    Goldfish Pentium691's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    School
    Posts
    52
    Thanks for the input.

    Yeah, it seems that unless I go for the $600 Core i7-3630K, then LGA 2011 is probably not the best bet.

    I wonder if they will make a lower priced six core CPU for LGA 2011 in the next year or so?
    No Pentium yet!!!

    CPU : AMD FX-56
    Mobo: ABIT KN9 SLI
    Mem : 2 x 512 Kingston
    GPU : ATI 850XT
    SND : Fatal1ty FPS X-FI by Creative
    HDD : Barrucuda SATA 200Gb
    KEY : Fatal1ty
    MOS : MS Laser

  6. #6
    Great White Shark
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    8,655
    Deleted....
    Last edited by mikeysg; 07-02-2012 at 01:11 AM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •