1.6ghz centrino duo vs. 1.86ghz centrino 750 solo

Sharky Forums


Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: 1.6ghz centrino duo vs. 1.86ghz centrino 750 solo

  1. #1
    the inevitable outcome [C]'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Strathroy, ON, Canada
    Posts
    3,400

    1.6ghz centrino duo vs. 1.86ghz centrino 750 solo

    how much performance difference do you figure you would notice between these cpus everything else being equal.
    ..:: w00f w00f ::..

  2. #2
    Mako Shark mynameis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    3,585
    What do you plan on doing with them? Regardless, I would guess not very much.

    MacBook Pro 13-inch, 2.3Ghz i5, 8GB RAM, 640GB HD
    Desktop: i5 2500K (w/ CM Hyper 212 Plus) , 16GB DDR3, 2x240GB OCZ Agility SSD, 2x1TB in RAID0, 2xeVGA GeForce GTX 570, Corsair TX750M PSU, ASUS Sabertooth P67, Dell 2209WA eIPS LCD
    Home Server: Intel Pentium G630, ASRock H61M/U3S3, 4GB RAM, 80GB + 2TB HD

  3. #3
    Hammerhead Shark bugspop1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,131
    Your only talking 200mhz! That's not much difference! I'd go with the Duo myself! The Duo will out preform the solo by a long shot, being able to run multiple programs at once without bogging the performance.
    CoolerMaster Cosoms Full Tower
    Enermax Revolution 1050w PSU (Modular Cabling)
    AMD PhenomII X4 [email protected] Black Edition
    Asus M4A79 Deluxe
    4x2GB G.Skill DDR2 1066 PC2 8500
    2x1TB Seagate Hard Drives
    2xLite-On DVD-RW Smarterase/Lightscribe
    XFX nVidia GeForce 285 GTX 1GB
    26" Westinghouse Monitor
    Logitech Webcam 9000 Pro
    Logitech MX 5500 Combo
    Logitech z-640 5.1 Surround Sound
    Windows 10 Professional 64bit
    Brother MFC-9440cn AIO
    Brother MFC-845cw AIO
    Brother QL-570 Label Printer

  4. #4
    Hammerhead Shark shadow_chazzer_killer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    India (not Indiana)
    Posts
    1,098
    I would get the Duo. It will be faster then the Solo. Consider MTing.
    E8200 4g @ 1.24v | DFI LT P35 | 4GB GSKILL PI + OCZ 2GB Platinum | HD4850 890/1100 | Dell 2407 | XFI + Z5500 | 2x750GB | CM690 heavily modded
    Watercooled
    -
    PA120.3, MCW60, 2xMCW30, FuZion V1, Tygon R3400

  5. #5
    the inevitable outcome [C]'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Strathroy, ON, Canada
    Posts
    3,400
    your right, i will be doing very little with this laptop. i own a dell xps gen2 still in decent shape, i need something a bit lighter and mobile for very basic stuff. Thats why I am looking at these, I am able to get a new one very reasonably priced for a quite bit less then retail through a work discount.

    Just thought I would throw the question out there. I know the duo cpu is decent but i wasnt sure how it compared to the mobile m 1.8ghz in comparison.

    Thanks again
    ..:: w00f w00f ::..

  6. #6
    Senor Sausage
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    8,374
    Quote Originally Posted by [C]
    your right, i will be doing very little with this laptop. i own a dell xps gen2 still in decent shape, i need something a bit lighter and mobile for very basic stuff. Thats why I am looking at these, I am able to get a new one very reasonably priced for a quite bit less then retail through a work discount.

    Just thought I would throw the question out there. I know the duo cpu is decent but i wasnt sure how it compared to the mobile m 1.8ghz in comparison.

    Thanks again
    I think adding battery life into the equation would be an essential then. Would the mobile savvy sharks tell us which offers better battery life. I mean the Duos don't consume that much power at all, is there any significant advantage in battery life ?

    I would personally vouch for the Core Duo myself.

    Xbox Live Gamertag: Weistber

    Gaming Rig Status: Up
    | i5-2500 | MSI GTX560 | 2x2GB Corsair ValueRam


    Games I'm playing: Witcher 2 (PC), RAGE(PC), Fallout: New Vegas (PC), Gears Of War 3 (X360)

  7. #7
    the inevitable outcome [C]'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Strathroy, ON, Canada
    Posts
    3,400
    Its interesting you mention that - one of the reasons I was leaning towards the duo was the proposed increased battery life for more cpu power. Reviews and articles claim it depends on a number of factors, obviously. Bios, chipset, processing tasks, etc. But everything else being equal power to battery life is definantly improved just not sure to what extent realistically although numbers are showing about 25%.
    ..:: w00f w00f ::..

  8. #8
    Hammerhead Shark bugspop1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,131
    Both should do well with the battery life being as there both Centrino. Along with the battery life being better they will also run quite a bit cooler than the Pentium IV.
    CoolerMaster Cosoms Full Tower
    Enermax Revolution 1050w PSU (Modular Cabling)
    AMD PhenomII X4 [email protected] Black Edition
    Asus M4A79 Deluxe
    4x2GB G.Skill DDR2 1066 PC2 8500
    2x1TB Seagate Hard Drives
    2xLite-On DVD-RW Smarterase/Lightscribe
    XFX nVidia GeForce 285 GTX 1GB
    26" Westinghouse Monitor
    Logitech Webcam 9000 Pro
    Logitech MX 5500 Combo
    Logitech z-640 5.1 Surround Sound
    Windows 10 Professional 64bit
    Brother MFC-9440cn AIO
    Brother MFC-845cw AIO
    Brother QL-570 Label Printer

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •