Entertainment Weekly: PS3 v.s Wii v.s 360

[vairox]

While keeping an eye on reports of diehard gamers (and more than a few eBay entreprenuers) braving long lines and cold nights — and even facing down guns — to purchase their Sony PS3s and Nintendo Wiis, we spent the last weekend putting these new consoles, as well as the year-old Xbox 360, through their paces. You might be surprised (or outraged) by our grades. So please keep in mind that these reviews reflect our immediate post-launch impressions — we promise to re-review them within the next year.

read it

interesting on the PS3 -

The first batch of games is a letdown: Most of them look no better than what you can see on the Xbox 360 — and none offer any revolutionary step up in gameplay.

were they supposed to? guess they forgot this console was supposed to be released when the 360 was and was supposed to compete directly with it and is therefore just as old as the 360....they make it sound like the PS3 was just thought up and released....

[kpxgq]

ummm does anyone care?

[vairox]

ummm does anyone care?

probably the fanboys who get more and more depressed with every anti-PS3 article published.... I can tell.

[fastitocalon]

Oh burn! lol

[steppy76]

I still find it kind of annoying that every review has a line that reads something like this...."Even though the PS3 is massively more powerful than the 360....." Ok, nothing about the games bear that out, and most tech heads agree that it doesn't appear so either(most agree the 360 has a better GPU). It is that they truly don't understand the tech stuff and just regurgitate what sony told them? Believe your eyes and your ears...the PS3 is roughly equal in power to the 360.

[Timman_24]

I've been reading some articles about the Cell vs 360's triple core. They did an indepth analysis and found out that 360's cpu does more gigaflops than the Cell. I wish I could find it. I do hate how the media has bought into Sony's hype about the Cell be all powerful.

[monroeski]

guess they forgot this console was supposed to be released when the 360 was and was supposed to compete directly with it and is therefore just as old as the 360....they make it sound like the PS3 was just thought up and released....

With technology, it is expected that if you come out a full year after the competition, you should be technologically more advanced. Doesn't matter when it was "supposed to" come out, what matters is when it DOES come out. When Duke Nukem Forever comes out, are we going to judge it based on Half Life which came out the same year that DNF was supposed to?

Couldn't resist the cheap shot at DNF.

I do hate how the media has bought into Sony's hype about the Cell be all powerful.

I haven't really seen anything except for ads where the media has bought into the hype. Most stuff I see talks about how the games really aren't any better than the 360's.

[vairox]

With technology, it is expected that if you come out a full year after the competition, you should be technologically more advanced. Doesn't matter when it was "supposed to" come out, what matters is when it DOES come out. When Duke Nukem Forever comes out, are we going to judge it based on Half Life which came out the same year that DNF was supposed to?

thats the issue.... sony is not more advanced, they are way late to the game and they have to say that in the articles... and they are not, they just keep saying how much more powerful it is and how much more technically advanced it is... it's an 04 beemer that was just released, call it what it is.

[Adisharr]

I never understood why people would wait in line and fight over a console that only has mediocre games at the moment.

Why bother?

[Spaceman Spiff]

I never understood why people would wait in line and fight over a console that only has mediocre games at the moment.

Why bother?

You and your "logic".

pfft!

[rhettro]

I read a tech report that said the 360 was technically superior to the PS3, and another that said it was going to take a while for the programmers figure out how to best code for the PS3, and when they did, it would out step the 360. I'm sure games for both systems will improve, but I doubt the PS3 will be superior to the 360.

[vairox]

by the time they figure out how to program for it or whatever else and the games start looking superior, M$ will already have it's next console out.

[vairox]

it's a fad... you tell people that something is in demand and they will buy into it... you can do it with pretty much anything, if you made a story up and just showed a line of people camping out and showed some retards flashing the heavy metal sign wearing snow jackets and said they were all out there to buy ziplock bags full of dog **** people would buy into it and go join the line, must be something good about that dog **** if everyone wants some right?

at the end of the day it's just a bag of dogshit...or a PS3...whichever you bought.

people never sit there and ask themselves "ok wait a minute, what is the item? what does it do? where did it come from, is it even worth it, do I need it, will I use it?

they just buy it because so and so is gonna get one and if he has one then they need one too just cause someone else has it.... these same folks are the ones that are pissed that a farreri costs $250k... they just can't frivilously buy one of those just cause someone else has one.

[vairox]

dude paying to complete a game is beyond lame.... thats uncalled for, you buy a game sleeve and thats your ticket to buy the rest of the game? pffftttt...