|
-
Hammerhead Shark
2-2-2-5-1t?
Besides Corsair, what Brand do some of you suggest for a DIMM which can run on 2-2-2-5-1T settings?
Ooooh, and a side question: Difference between Serial and Parallel ATA?
-
By the Power of Greyskull
Well a lot of brands can run 2-2-2-5 T1 with extra voltage or within the rated speeds 
Such as Kingston HyperX, Corsair... (I like those brands alot!)
Also the difference is connection type 
The drives are identical (except for the Raptor) to their PATA model.. Except with a SATA interface...
I connected my 200GB WD SE drive to my SATA port (with a SATA->PATA) and the performance was identical under Sandra... I didnt test it extensively...
SATA also only allows 1 connection per cable.. Since it is Serial and not Parallel
Intel I9 14900K|ASUS - MAXIMUS Z790 HERO|ASUS GTX 1080 Ti|64GB G.Skill|(3) Samsung 990 Pro 4TB NVME |Custom water cooling||Alienware AW3423DW 34" OLED
288TB Plex server (UNRAID)
(16) WD Red Pro 20TB
-
Man With Nothing To Lose
Some notable improvements over Parallel ATA with Serial ATA is that it's faster. It currently has a peak transfer rate of 150MB/sec, with 300MB/sec and 600MB/sec being possibilities in future revisions.
SATA is also less prone to interference, is capable of having longer cable lengths, has smaller cable width to improve case airflow, supports all 3 DC voltages (3.3V, 5V, and 12V) and the best of all, it is hot pluggable. You don't need to power off a system for a Serial ATA drive to be recognized.
Last edited by jagojago12; 07-19-2003 at 08:07 AM.
"If everything you try works, then you are not trying hard enough." - Gordon E. Moore
Desktop:
AMD Athlon XP [email protected] (11.0x210) | EPoX EP-8RDA+ | 512MB Crucial PC3200 | VisionTek GeForce4 Ti4600 | nVidia SoundStorm 5.1 | 160GB 7200RPM Western Digital | 48x/12x/48x Lite-On CD-RW | Lite-On 16x DVD-RW | 19" NEC AccuSync 90
Laptop:
Intel Pentium-M 1.4GHz ULV | 512MB Nanya PC2700 | ATi Mobility Radeon 9200 | 60GB 4200RPM Toshiba | 8x/16x/10x/24x Matshita DVD/CDRW | 12.1" Sony XGA TFT
SharkyExtreme 3DMark Team
-
Hammerhead Shark
Okay, so, PATA is just SATA but allows multiple connections but PATA drives were born earlier than SATA drives, or SATA drives have been 'upgraded' recently rather.
About the memory, beesides Kingston, Corsair, theres other brands i've heard of. Mushkin for example, but Mushkin sounds like, well, a noname brand, and the problem is theres tons of memory brands and they can't all be bad!
-
By the Power of Greyskull
Originally posted by jagojago12
Some notable improvements over Parallel ATA with Serial ATA is that it's faster. It currently has a peak transfer rate of 150MB/sec, with 300MB/sec and 600MB/sec being possibilities in future revisions.
SATA is also less prone to interference, is capable of having longer cable lengths, has smaller cable width to improve case airflow, supports all 3 DC voltages (3.3V, 5V, and 12V) and the best of all, it is hot pluggable. You don't need to power off a system for a Serial ATA drive to be recognized.
I thought the second gen was hot pluggable only??? Sorry I didnt keep up with the SATA, I'll wait for the new chip SATAII before I go SATA completely.. Even though I have 2 Raptors now to play around with 
Part of the reason SATA is not worth it is drive limitations... When I put my PATA drive on a SATA channel with a PATA->SATA converter. I didnt see any difference...
So I wonder if the speed of the 7200rpm drives are maxed out and we would only see a difference with 10k rpm and up.. Such as the Raptor...
-------------
Yes Mushkin is pretty good.. But I havent used them before...
Intel I9 14900K|ASUS - MAXIMUS Z790 HERO|ASUS GTX 1080 Ti|64GB G.Skill|(3) Samsung 990 Pro 4TB NVME |Custom water cooling||Alienware AW3423DW 34" OLED
288TB Plex server (UNRAID)
(16) WD Red Pro 20TB
-
Colossus do you notice any performance increases going from a regular 7200RPM hard drive to the raptors? I'm thinking 2 raptors in a striped-RAID setup, with a giant 200GB IDE drive for storage would be good for my next system. But when running the OS and games off of the raptors, does it actually run faster? Do you get slightly better framerates or benchmarks?
-
By the Power of Greyskull
The game itself would not run faster.. But you would have a faster load time...
I havent stripped the drives yet... But a single drive alone is pretty snappy...
Intel I9 14900K|ASUS - MAXIMUS Z790 HERO|ASUS GTX 1080 Ti|64GB G.Skill|(3) Samsung 990 Pro 4TB NVME |Custom water cooling||Alienware AW3423DW 34" OLED
288TB Plex server (UNRAID)
(16) WD Red Pro 20TB
-
Hammerhead Shark
-
By the Power of Greyskull
Yes the 36GB Western Digital SATA drive are SATA
Intel I9 14900K|ASUS - MAXIMUS Z790 HERO|ASUS GTX 1080 Ti|64GB G.Skill|(3) Samsung 990 Pro 4TB NVME |Custom water cooling||Alienware AW3423DW 34" OLED
288TB Plex server (UNRAID)
(16) WD Red Pro 20TB
-
at what speeds?
The Buffalo that I tested did 216 (4 slots populated, and all were 512MB = 2048MB) and I hit 216 @ the MOST aggressive timings!
Desktop: AMD Athlon X2 4400 | DFI Lanparty nF4 SLI-DR | 2GB OCZ PC4000 EB Platinum Edition | eVGA 7800GTX | Gateway FPD2185W | 2x Maxtor 250GB 16MB SATA RAID 0 | Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS Gamer | Hiper Type-R 580W
Coming Soon: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 | ASUS Striker Extreme Nforce 680I | 2GB Corsair XMS2 8500C5D | eVGA 8800GTX | Sound Blaster X-FI FATAL1TY FPS | OCZ GameXStream 700W | Windos Vista: Home Premium
-
so what difference do these memory timings make?
I got Mushkin ram rated at 2.5 cas.. and I got my settings now on 6-2-2-2 and I have NO idea what that means haha
just pickin what #'s I see the rest of you guys use.. using stock memory voltage too.
-
Hammerhead Shark
The lower, the better. The numbers refer to clock cycles, the lower the better.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|