Samsung 40" OLED!

Sharky Forums


Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Samsung 40" OLED!

  1. #1
    Snarky Quorums MrDigital's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Canuckistan
    Posts
    8,224

    Samsung 40" OLED!

    http://www.physorg.com/news4160.html

    Shattering traditional AM OLED size limitations, the new prototype offers a maximum screen brightness of 600 nits; a black-and-white contrast ratio of 5,000:1; and, a color gamut of 80 percent. Motion pictures with ultra-high quality images can be impeccably reproduced by skillfully employing OLED's rapid video response capabilities for image processing of HD-class resolution. The ultra-thin shape of the panels will allow future TV set designers to create televisions with a total thickness of only 3cm or less.
    Low resolution though:
    The high-definition-compatible OLED prototype has a wide screen pixel format of 1280x800 (WXGA) driven by an amorphous silicon (a-Si) active matrix backplane to permit faster video response times with low power consumption.
    -MrD
    There is the theory of the moebius. A twist in the fabric of space where time becomes a loop.

  2. #2
    Snarky Quorums MrDigital's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Canuckistan
    Posts
    8,224
    I also just noticed they released "the world's first 21" HD-class (1920x1080) OLED panel in January, 2005." I wonder if that's for sale anywhere.

    Would that be 1080p?

    -MrD
    There is the theory of the moebius. A twist in the fabric of space where time becomes a loop.

  3. #3
    Great White Shark
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Posts
    21,595
    40" is kind of small for watching HDTV. Now if they can increase the size by 50%.

  4. #4
    Hammerhead Shark masteraleph's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Portsmouth VA/UPenn
    Posts
    2,731
    Originally posted by MrDigital
    I also just noticed they released "the world's first 21" HD-class (1920x1080) OLED panel in January, 2005." I wonder if that's for sale anywhere.

    Would that be 1080p?

    -MrD
    It's 1080p with an additional 120 pixels vertically. Computer monitors tend to be 16:10 rather than 16:9, as that way they can display standard resolutions better (1080p would be 1920x1080, but would only allow for 1440x1080 in a 4:3 resolution...whereas 1920x1200 allows for 1600x1200).
    My current rig
    Dell Dimension 8200:
    Dell 2000FP
    P4 2.53 Ghz, 1G PC800, 120 GB WDSE, XFX 6600GT (dual DVI!)
    Terratec DMX6Fire LT/Zemo-dded EMU 0404, Altec Lansing ADA 995s/Pimeta+HD580s/A900s
    Win XP Pro/Office Pro
    MX1000/MS Wireless Optical Desktop Pro keyboard
    Belkin Universal UPS 1200VA

  5. #5
    Mako Shark
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Grand Rapids, MI
    Posts
    4,579
    The funny thing about this is that they are having issues with blue still. Samsung does not expect this monitor to last longer than the show. If you ask me, OLED still has a long way to come. On the other hand SED should be out later this year - which is good. It will hopefully be the first of the next generation technologies that can really rival the CRT and put the underperforming LCD out of business once and for all.
    If you really want 'em to be a single unit, duct tape your router to your modem. - Skydog 5/5/2005

    MAIN - HP - e6300, 2GB DDR2, 300GB HDD, 250GB HDD, `6x DVD-RW, ATI X800GT, 500w Rosewill PSU

    Work - eMachine T6520, A64 3400+, 1GB PC 3200, 300GB HDD, 16x DVD R/RW, CD-ROM, Via Envy Sound

    HTPC - 2500XP, 1GB PC3200, 60GB HDD, 8x DVD R/RW, Via Envy Sound, ATI 9600PRO, 380w Antec PSU

    SERVER - 1800XP, 512MB PC2100, 3x40GB HDD (RAID5), 2x40GB HDD (RAID1), DDS3 Tape Drive, 300w Enermax PSU

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •