|
-
144Hz ASUS Monitor
http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/26/a...-refresh-rate/
Interesting, but again, without Displayport, it is a non-starter for me.
Crusader for the 64-bit Era.
New Rule: 2GB per core, minimum.
Intel i7-9700K | Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming ITX | Samsung 970 Evo 2TB SSD
64GB DDR4-2666 Samsung | EVGA RTX 2070 Black edition
Fractal Arc Midi |Seasonic X650 PSU | Klipsch ProMedia 5.1 Ultra | Windows 10 Pro x64
-
Engineer credit to *****!
 Originally Posted by James
Is it a TN panel?
|Core i5 2500K @ 4.6GHz|MSI Z77-GD65|8.0GB G.skill DDR3 1600|XFX AMD 6870|
|Samsung 830 SSD|HP LP2465 24" LCD|Antec P280|Seasonic X750 PSU|H2O Cooling|Windows 7 x64|
|Core i3 2100|ASRock H61-GM|8.0GB DDR3|AMD Radeon 6450|Kingston V100+ SSD|
|Antec Fusion V2|Epson 8350 1080P 3LCD on 100" EliteScreen|
|ThinkPad T420|Core i5 2520M|8.0GB DDR3|OCZ Vertex 4|
Audio: Radeon 6450 (HDMI)->Onkyo TX-NR509 ->Polk M60/M30/CSII + Velodyne VX10
-
nuclear launch detected
probably, wake me when they have a 100Hz+ IPS panel at 125+ ppi
bitfenix prodigy, i5 4670k, asrock z87e-itx, zotac gtx 970, crucial m500 msata, seasonic x650, dell st2220t
-
Reef Shark
Yup it's TN and 1080P. If all you care about is high refresh rates and being able to do 3D then it's a good monitor. Otherwise it's kind of meh.
Last edited by Loser-P; 07-27-2012 at 12:46 PM.
-
I don't roll on Shabbos!
No thanks. I've been down the 120hz road, and it is fantastic. However, the color and view angle from IPS is worth more than the faster refresh. Once we have high hertz IPS screens, I will be in heaven. TN panels are worthless IMO.
PC: Corsair 550D
4280k | Asus Rampage Gene | Mushkin 4x4GB | EVGA 780
Intel 120GB SSD + 2TB Seagate | Seasonic 660 Plat
2x Alphacool XT45 | Laing DDC | Bitspower
Currently playing: Civ 5
Last Game Beaten: Walking Dead
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|