adsl - dsl - sdsl - cable????

Sharky Forums


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: adsl - dsl - sdsl - cable????

  1. #1
    Catfish
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    winnipeg, Canada
    Posts
    100

    Post adsl - dsl - sdsl - cable????

    Whats the difference?

    I went from cable over to adsl about 9 months ago. I miss the 50k+ upload speed of cable compared to the 17k of my adsl. But then again I usually get 126k download speed on my adsl. Anyway, everyone around here is talking about dsl. Is that like adsl, in that it uses a program to dial up? or is like cable and always connected? My telephone company is offering sdsl in januraray. Will this be like adsl? or more to the dedicated access like cable?
    The reason i ask is because im looking at a router and as far as i know, they dont work with adsl connections. Will they work with sdsl? Is dsl better than adsl and sdsl? Thanks

  2. #2
    Tiger Shark
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Phila, PA
    Posts
    519

    Post

    Well I have @home right now and I personally think it SUCKS B@LLS ! Any one in favor ?
    You may consider yourself EXTREMELY lucky if you get 50KB/s uploads on cable. I only had this for the first month, then it became 15KB/s. Downloads are totally unpredictable, depending on what my neighbours are doing because it is not a dedicated line. They do not allow you to run servers, and even if you do run a game server you can only have like 4-6 people with pings oh 130 or worse and a huge amount of lagg. (Quake 3 for ex.)
    And finally their customer service just sucks. 10 minutes on hold is average.
    I say go with DSL, in fact i'm looking for a decent dsl provider myself right now.
    There are no stupid questions, there are stupid answers.

  3. #3
    Goldfish
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    56

    Post

    Basically, there are 2 types of DSL service on the market now: ADSL and SDSL. ADSL is Asynchronous DSL meaning the downstream speed differs from the upstream speed and is the more popular choice for residential use because it offers faster downloading speed by sacrificing the upload speed. For example, my Earthstink ADSL service is 768kbps/128kbps (best case scenario it'll do that). On the other hand SDSL is Synchronous DSL meaning the downstream and upstream speeds are the same. This service is usually the choice for businesses and is much more expensive than the ADSL service. So, unless you'll be doing alot of uploading or serving, it wouldn't be worth your money. As for the router, the information I've read says that it would work fine for any DSL or cable service. I just ordered the Linksys DSL router with 4 port switch for my service so I shall see how that works when it arrives.

  4. #4
    Reef Shark
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    376

    Post

    Right now I have both Cable and ADSL. I got cable first when I moved into my apartment as it was installed within 3 days of moving in and ADSL was going to take some time. Everybody has hit the nail on the head telling you the diff between ADSL and SDSL. The only thing I want to add is the part where you mentioned DSL with an always on connection like Cable. As of right now there are 2 types of DSL you can get, PPPoE/A (Ethernet or ATM) or Bridged service. Most DSL ISP's are going with PPPoE/A now because it's easier for them to manage. It is where when you reboot, you will have to connect manually by actually dialing into the CO (although it's not a phone # you're dialing). With Bridged service, it's just like Cable, where if you reboot, y our internet connection is alive as soon as you get into Windows or your OS of choice. As far as using a router, you can use it with either one of these, as most routers are compatible with either/or.

    Cheers.
    AMD Athlon XP 1400/266
    Swiftech HS/Fan
    MSI VIA266 Chipset
    512 MB PC2100 DDR
    GeForce4 4600 128 MB
    Hercules Game Theatre XP
    Intel 10/100 NIC
    (2) 40 GB IBM Desktar's
    Pioneer 16x DVD Rom (slot Drive)
    Samsung CDRW (24x)
    Enermax (350w PSU)
    Lian-Li PC-60

  5. #5
    Catfish
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Merced, CA, USA
    Posts
    231

    Post

    I never knew there was a type of DSL that wasn't always-on.

    I guess you learn something new every day.

    -bZj

    ------------------
    .sig: coming soon to a post near you!
    .sig: coming soon to a post near you!

  6. #6
    Reef Shark
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    376

    Post

    Well, PPPoE/A is still always on, but there is a possibility that you could get disconnected and have to "manually" reconnect it instead of it just "coming back up". The PPP accounts are more like dialup and easier to implement, and also allow the ISP's to have "self installs" for DSL so they don't have to send a technician out to everybody's house and thus it gets installed faster.
    AMD Athlon XP 1400/266
    Swiftech HS/Fan
    MSI VIA266 Chipset
    512 MB PC2100 DDR
    GeForce4 4600 128 MB
    Hercules Game Theatre XP
    Intel 10/100 NIC
    (2) 40 GB IBM Desktar's
    Pioneer 16x DVD Rom (slot Drive)
    Samsung CDRW (24x)
    Enermax (350w PSU)
    Lian-Li PC-60

  7. #7
    Catfish
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Posts
    114

    Post

    Pulled from DSL Reports

    ADSL is a service that runs at a different speed up and down, up to 8 megabits/sec down and 1 megabit/sec up, and is limited to distances of around 18,000 ft towards the high end, and cannot run through various devices that can be placed on the phone line such as a DLC (fiber in the line). IDSL is a service that is based on ISDN technology, runs at a maximum speed of 144 kilobits/sec each way, but can go anywhere ISDN can, at a distance of up to 50,000 ft with the currently used versions, and can run through most DLC.

    If gaming is absolutely most important use of the line for you go for the slower SDSL connection because it can give considerably lower pings than ADSL.
    If a mix of gaming and download and general usage is more important, you may be happier with ADSL because you can still get low pings, and you can get the faster downloads.

    If you have heard even something about DSL, you will have heard about distance. Your phone lines normally terminate at a telco office, usually nearby. This distance, (the length of your line between your location and the telco office), is a very important factor in whether or not you can get DSL, and what speed you can get.
    Here are some rules of thumb for distance ranges. Please be aware that especially with non Telco ADSL lines, distance limits for speeds can vary widely from company to company. There are cases where it is policy for "residential" DSL lines not to be offered as far out as functionally identical "business" products!

    Less than 5000 feet you will have little trouble getting all speeds of DSL

    5000-10600 You may have trouble getting the highest speeds on offer

    10600-15000 The danger zone for DSL from national CLECs like Covad and NorthPoint. Speeds on offer are pinned back steadily until they reach 192k for 15,000 feet. If your line is longer than around 15000 feet, they may not accept an order.

    15000-18000 In this range, Telco ADSL is normally still available, although it may be restricted to 300-500k speeds

    18000-22000 Telco ADSL is not available, although in a few areas, RADSL may be a product you can get. RADSL is speed-variable.
    Some smaller DSL specialist CLECs may have solutions for you.

    22000-28000 Using less commonly used DSL equipment, it is still possible to use lines of this length.

    18000-28000 IDSL is an alternative or possibly the only alternative. IDSL is 144k/sec, about four-six times modem speed.
    28000-38000 IDSL is the only alternative

    Right now, your choice is probably going to be either SDSL or ADSL. ADSL is generally available more cheaply than SDSL, and usually from your local Telco, although Covad sells a lot of ADSL lines. ADSL is designed for the home user. (RADSL is a slight variation on ADSL, which supposedly offers a longer reach).

    If you are going to be operating servers I would suggest SDSL if you can get it, not only because the maximum upstream speed is generally faster than ADSL, but because your DSL provider is more likely to understand your needs, give you a fixed ip and be more responsive to technical problems.

    VDSL is DSL delivered over fibre to some lucky lucky people, US West, Gilbert, Phoenix being one example. It runs to 56mbits and will support 4 TVs (loads of channels), phone integrated to the TV (caller ID on the TV screen) and 1meg up and down for PCs.

    IDSL can be thought of as modern ISDN. The technology for IDSL is different than DSL, and since it is not as mass-market, it is also more expensive. Your money is not paying for bandwidth, it is paying for equipment and installation that is not as frequently performed, and therefore costs more.

    To some extent, also, IDSL prices maybe higher because they can be: IDSL is often the only choice if you are sufficiently far away from your CO.

  8. #8
    Great White Shark
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Posts
    21,595

    Post

    If you have a single PC, you don't need a router to connect to any kind of DSL service. If you have a network at home, the hardware you need depends upon the operating system you are using. For example, Win2k Server has both NAT and routing built in. All you have to do is set it up. You can use ICS in Win98 and WinMe to do achieve similar results through port sharing on the box that is connected to the DSL interface box. If you want to go with a hardware solution, you can buy a router/switch for a few bucks, plug 'n play.

  9. #9
    Tiger Shark john drake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    San Gabriel CA.
    Posts
    736

    Talking

    I've got Dsl from Pac Bell in southern ca. True with basic 39.95 a month dsl I only get a measley 128k up. But were i live i get 767kbs down which isnt to shabby. One mistake I did make is to get a UBS Dsl modem , I should insisted on a NIC based dsl modem, Talking to other folks with pac bell dsl modem with the nic card is about 5% to 10% faster than going thought the usb. But still compaired to dial up it rocks and unlike sucko cable I'm aways crusing along at a constant 70kbs or better(unless the sites servers suck). Did i mention I love my DSL?

    ------------------
    we want information, information....
    Q: Why do you care?

    A: You'll never know.

    system Amd 64 3200+, nvidia 6800gs 256meg
    maxtor 250gig sata hdr, 1 gig of ram,nec x16 dvd rw,
    dsl.

  10. #10
    Hammerhead Shark steppy76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    milwaukee
    Posts
    2,702

    Post

    Well, with roadrunner cable I get 250 kilobytes/second downloads and 40 kilobytes/second uploads. At its worst it drops to 110 kilobytes down and upload has yet to be affected. Even at my worst I still get better downloads than a 768Kb/s dsl connection.

    ------------------
    P3 866 128 pc133 cas2 ram
    radeon 32ddr 20 gig 7200 hd 52x cd-rom
    2004-----------------------------------------------1986
    Athlon XP 1600------------------------[email protected]
    Shuttle AK31 mobo------------------no clue anymore
    512MB PC2100 RAM------------------------256K RAM
    Powercolor 9700 NP-----------------------4 color CGA
    150(120 +30)gig hd--------------------2 x 360k 5.25 floppy
    48x cd-rom--------------------------------Yeah Right!
    Rhythmic Edge-----------------------------PC Speaker

  11. #11
    Hammerhead Shark steppy76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    milwaukee
    Posts
    2,702

    Post

    Well, with roadrunner cable I get 250 kilobytes/second downloads and 40 kilobytes/second uploads. At its worst it drops to 110 kilobytes down and upload has yet to be affected. Even at my worst I still get better downloads than a 768 kbit/s dsl connection.

    ------------------
    P3 866 128 pc133 cas2 ram
    radeon 32ddr 20 gig 7200 hd 52x cd-rom
    2004-----------------------------------------------1986
    Athlon XP 1600------------------------[email protected]
    Shuttle AK31 mobo------------------no clue anymore
    512MB PC2100 RAM------------------------256K RAM
    Powercolor 9700 NP-----------------------4 color CGA
    150(120 +30)gig hd--------------------2 x 360k 5.25 floppy
    48x cd-rom--------------------------------Yeah Right!
    Rhythmic Edge-----------------------------PC Speaker

  12. #12
    Expensive Sushi
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    somewhere, CA
    Posts
    14

    Post

    Most of the newer routers have support for PPOE... unfortunately no one makes a router for the phoneline networks yet so I'm stuck behind ICS(which sucks)!

  13. #13
    Reef Shark
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    376

    Post

    what makes ICS suck? I have used it before in Win2K and it works great. Win98 was a little harder to setup and didn't seem as fast, but with win2k it's great, never had a problem with it.

    As far as gaming and getting SDSL for gaming instead of ADSL, it's all a marketing ploy if you ask me. I have plenty of servers I ping 50 or below on with my ADSL (1.5/256up) and a few taht are 30 and below, and I only pay $40 a month and I actually always get the speed of 120-150k/sec downloads and 25k/sec uploads, so no complaints here...

    If I went with SDSL, I'd have to pay about $100 a month to get anywhere near the downloads I'm getting now, and even then I wouldn't get over 100k/sec I'd imagine since most commonly 768/768 SDSL is about the highest you can get before it really starts getting expensive, and even it is expensive...

    ------------------
    P3 800e @ 945 FCPGA
    Abit BE6-II v1.0
    Alpha HS/Fan
    Creative GeForce 2 GTS 32 MB
    256 MB cas2
    20GB, 10GB Maxtor's
    4x Creative CDRW
    10x DVD
    SB Live! Value
    Intel 10/100 NIC
    Enlight 7237 250W
    3Com ADSL PCI Modem
    (1.5Mbps/256Kbps)
    AMD Athlon XP 1400/266
    Swiftech HS/Fan
    MSI VIA266 Chipset
    512 MB PC2100 DDR
    GeForce4 4600 128 MB
    Hercules Game Theatre XP
    Intel 10/100 NIC
    (2) 40 GB IBM Desktar's
    Pioneer 16x DVD Rom (slot Drive)
    Samsung CDRW (24x)
    Enermax (350w PSU)
    Lian-Li PC-60

  14. #14
    Sushi
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Posts
    2

    Post

    I have SDSL 784/784 and it costs $39.95/month--not too shabby. I usually get ~88KB/s up, and ~90KB/s down.

  15. #15
    Great White Shark
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Posts
    21,595

    Post

    Originally posted by KaHaR:
    I have SDSL 784/784 and it costs $39.95/month--not too shabby. I usually get ~88KB/s up, and ~90KB/s down.
    Who is your provider? I'd have to pay over $130/month for similar service in Tampa, Florida so I have 384/384 for $90/month.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •