Quake 4 Preview in PC Gamer

Sharky Forums


Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: Quake 4 Preview in PC Gamer

  1. #1
    Tiger Shark cookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    702

    Quake 4 Preview in PC Gamer

    Just lettin' yall know. Also the first review of RTW. It got a 92%. There was also another game coming from the makers of UT, forgot the name tho. It's supposed to be geared all toward SP and looked pretty cool. Comments?

  2. #2
    Reef Shark
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    409
    I just finised reading the article. I have a question/concern.

    How does everyone here feel about it being built on the Doom3 engine? While it's a great engine I don't feel it's the most efficient. In the article they mentioned the same problem with multiplayer being limited to 8 peeps. I mean come on. Quake just isn't quake if you can't have an 8 on 8 death match.

    Maybe it's just me though.
    ____________________________________
    My rig:
    AMD64 3000+ at 260x9
    MSI K8N Neo 2 Plat
    1GB XMS 4000
    Zalman CPNS7000-Cu
    260GB HD (7200RPM,8mb)
    BBA X800 Pro
    SB Audigy 2 ZS
    Logitec Z-680's
    Thermaltake 480w PSU
    Antec Full tower
    ____________________________________

  3. #3
    Tiger Shark Cobra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Victoria, BC, Canada
    Posts
    606

    Re: Quake 4 Preview in PC Gamer

    Originally posted by cookie
    There was also another game coming from the makers of UT, forgot the name tho. It's supposed to be geared all toward SP and looked pretty cool. Comments?
    Sounds like Pariah, which looks like an awesome game.
    ATi Forever!

  4. #4
    Mr Zurkon is here to kill PointlesS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Polaris Galaxy
    Posts
    15,950
    pariah is done by digital extremes...not offically the developer of the ut series (which is epic) but they definately did their fair share of maps and models that came with the game...it is running on the ut2k4 engine though...


    anyways I'm really looking forward to it...the doom 3 engine has it's strenths and weaknesses but I think it'll go well with quake 4...
    Lian Li PC-K7B | Intel i5 750 | 4GB A-Data 1600 | Gigabyte GA-P55-UD3R | XFX Radeon 5850 | 2-640GB WD Caviar Blue | X-fi Xtrememusic | Klipsch Promedia 5.1 Ultra | Dell U2311H | Antec Basiq Plus 550W | NEC 3550A | Win7 Ultimate x64
    and a whole lot of lovin..

  5. #5
    Mako Shark
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Wilds of Missouri
    Posts
    3,165
    Originally posted by Slirp
    I just finised reading the article. I have a question/concern.

    How does everyone here feel about it being built on the Doom3 engine? While it's a great engine I don't feel it's the most efficient. In the article they mentioned the same problem with multiplayer being limited to 8 peeps. I mean come on. Quake just isn't quake if you can't have an 8 on 8 death match.

    Maybe it's just me though.

    8 people deathmatch.. yea sounds a bit lame to me.. I see your point.
    Intel I7 920 @3.5MHz,12gigs DDR3 triple channel ram, Nvidia GTX 560 Video card, Twin Asus dvd burners, Twin 24inch Asus Monitors. Logitech 5300E 5.1 speakers, Logitech G5, Razer Diamonback and Microsoft Arc Mouses, 4TB hard drive space .

  6. #6
    Tiger Shark Beretta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    873
    Originally posted by Slirp
    Maybe it's just me though.

    No its not just you, thats ******** period. I enjoy a good 8 on 8 match bare minimum when its comes to Quake games. They better remodify the engine before they release Quake IV or its going to get criticized heavily by many major PC Gaming publications.

    I fore one am still waiting for the military outlets to put the new issue on the shelf.

    The Army... hurry up and wait.

  7. #7
    Reef Shark
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    409
    I don't know the more I think about it the more I don't like the situation. I have a 9800 pro which does not really play D3 at a level that I feel comfortable with as far as quality and speed. I've been looking at upgrading to the new gen cards and if games are continually going to be based on the D3 engine I'm almost forced to go Nvidia. While I like ATI and the X800's are awesome cards the 6800's just own in OpenGL.

    It's a shame Nvidia holds most of the patents on the standard and refuses to share them.

    I don't like it at all.
    ____________________________________
    My rig:
    AMD64 3000+ at 260x9
    MSI K8N Neo 2 Plat
    1GB XMS 4000
    Zalman CPNS7000-Cu
    260GB HD (7200RPM,8mb)
    BBA X800 Pro
    SB Audigy 2 ZS
    Logitec Z-680's
    Thermaltake 480w PSU
    Antec Full tower
    ____________________________________

  8. #8
    Mako Shark
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    4,650
    all leagues are 4v4 TDM ladies, ctf maybe goes 5v5 ( euros only :> )

  9. #9
    Expensive Sushi hex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    7
    Originally posted by Slirp
    I just finised reading the article. I have a question/concern.

    How does everyone here feel about it being built on the Doom3 engine? While it's a great engine I don't feel it's the most efficient. In the article they mentioned the same problem with multiplayer being limited to 8 peeps. I mean come on. Quake just isn't quake if you can't have an 8 on 8 death match.

    Maybe it's just me though.
    You won't need to worry about Q4 multiplayer. id is NOT going to release the game without making major changes to the multiplayer system. Otherwise, as stated above, Quake 4 is going to be heavily criticized.
    Also, 512MB video cards should be available by the time the game is released. Looking forward to upgrading, ppl?

  10. #10
    Reef Shark
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    409
    Originally posted by hex
    You won't need to worry about Q4 multiplayer. id is NOT going to release the game without making major changes to the multiplayer system. Otherwise, as stated above, Quake 4 is going to be heavily criticized.
    Also, 512MB video cards should be available by the time the game is released. Looking forward to upgrading, ppl?
    I don't mind upgrading so I can get better performance. I can't stand having to upgrade because I want the game to be playable. Especially when my hardware is only a little over a year old.
    ____________________________________
    My rig:
    AMD64 3000+ at 260x9
    MSI K8N Neo 2 Plat
    1GB XMS 4000
    Zalman CPNS7000-Cu
    260GB HD (7200RPM,8mb)
    BBA X800 Pro
    SB Audigy 2 ZS
    Logitec Z-680's
    Thermaltake 480w PSU
    Antec Full tower
    ____________________________________

  11. #11
    Tiger Shark Cobra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Victoria, BC, Canada
    Posts
    606
    Well, didn't PC Gamer say Raven will probably work around the limitations?
    ATi Forever!

  12. #12
    Mako Shark
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Wilds of Missouri
    Posts
    3,165
    hummm between quake4 and doom3 there such totally different games. (I know I know the game isnt out yet).. however, quake has traditionally been mulitplayer, extreamly fast paced, and blistering fast. How can you have a slow paced, deliberate engine do a fast paced mulitiplayer game?

    Hope they have some tricks up their sleeves.. besides in a deathmatch.. who the heck is looking around at the purty walls??
    Intel I7 920 @3.5MHz,12gigs DDR3 triple channel ram, Nvidia GTX 560 Video card, Twin Asus dvd burners, Twin 24inch Asus Monitors. Logitech 5300E 5.1 speakers, Logitech G5, Razer Diamonback and Microsoft Arc Mouses, 4TB hard drive space .

  13. #13
    No, *MY* new girlfriend!~ OpStar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    6,380

    ...

    Quake II was primarily single player, and story driven.

    Quake III Arena was all multiplayer.
    Last edited by OpStar; 09-28-2004 at 03:37 AM.
    |i7 2600k @ 4.8Ghz|Corsair H100i w/ NF-F12s|MSI P67A-GD65 B3|32GB Corsair XMS3|GTX 780 SLi|Skullcandy Slyr|1x250GB Evo 1x500GB Evo 1x1TB Evo|3x32LN5300|Win 8 Pro|Corsair Air 540|eVGA Super Nova 1300GS|

  14. #14
    Goldfish
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Waxahachie, TX
    Posts
    78
    8 player sucks to put it blunt. I miss the days of Quake II 8 on 8 CTF, and Team Deathmatch, and Lithium Deathmatch. Ah sweet memories...
    [P4 3.2Ghz|Abit IC7-Max3|EVGA 6800 GT|1 GB Corsair 3200LLPro|2x74 GB Raptors Raid0|Audigy 2 ZS Platinum|Lian Li 6077B|Antec NeoPower|Plextor PX-Premium|Plextor PX-712SA|Dell 2001FP]

  15. #15
    Print is dead. Kero-chan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    NYC Public Library
    Posts
    12,308
    are there still a lot of people playing quake2? i think i might install it again...
    Batou's evil twin
    Quote Originally Posted by Concerned Citizen View Post
    im a homosexual but i disliike obama for his non-*** policies
    Quote Originally Posted by ua549 View Post
    I'm happy for you. Why don't you go pick up a case of AIDS.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •