KT400 vs. KT333

Why does the via kt400 chipset suck so much??? i look over on toms hardware and i mean kt333 kicks the **** out of kt400 in some benchmarks, and its an older chipset!!! thats why ive been leaning towards getting a mobo with a kt333 chipset, 'cause i mean its a lot cheaper, more performance, and only maybe one or two less features, right?

EDIT>>> what the hell's with this new swear filter. now it gets the words @$$ and S#!+ too? it fricking censored my profile msg! when did this change happen?

what the **** are you talkin about:D

I really dont know why. i would guess that since there is no official ram support, and the fact that cpus are still way behind only at 133mhz that makes them perform so poorly, it could also be the fact that the boards that they reviewed were pretty early and a lot of the times they use slower memory timings for the ddr memory