Printable View
how come the AMD athlon 1Ghz costs more than the AMD thunderbird 1Ghz? Are Athlons better than thunderbirds?
------------------
*You betta watch your back fish! Squirrel masta aint gonna be there for you next time. And when I come for you, i'ma want some cocktail.......FRUIT!!!*
-Nasty Nate
BY NO MEANS ARE THE ATHLONS BETTER THAN THE THUNDERBIRDS!Quote:
Originally posted by buddylee123:
how come the AMD athlon 1Ghz costs more than the AMD thunderbird 1Ghz? Are Athlons better than thunderbirds?
Now that I've gotten that straight, I think the original Athlons are more expensive because AMD might've decreased production of the originals and increased production of the Thunderbirds. (Right??)
Lemme repeat myself: BY NO MEANS ARE THE ATHLONS BETTER THAN THE THUNDERBIRDS!
Hope that helps.
------------------
[!DOG]UGLYman
http://ut.ngworldstats.com/fcgi-bin/Display?gt=UT&gm=all&uid=1872447&page=m&view=p
I don't think classic Athlons are being produced any more at all. Because of that, and the fact that there is still some demand for them, the cost has to be high to ensure that they can keep some in stock. It's the law of supply and demand.
------------------
Despite the high cost of living, it remains popular.
Also, the cost of producing the Slot processors is typically higher than the cost of producing socket processors.
------------------
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein
the athlon classic/slot is more expensive because they're physically more expensive to produce, they're in limited quantity, in high demand, and they're a souvenir (spelled correctly?) of the beggining of competition in the cpu market space. ok maybe not that last one.................
------------------
Instead of AMD_Forever, I really think it's more like "Competition_Forever"