Speakers do you have?

...

logitec yes.. but mine are the 640's

klipsch pm 4.1...

the ones off my JVC minidisc micro-system

Klipsch Promedia 5.1's

I find it funny that you did not add the Altec Lansing 641s as there are quite a few regulars who have them...

My vote is for other. :cool:

Yeah, why were you too brief in this poll? YOu shoulda added the Altecs. I bet there are more Altec owners than Swan.

I have the Z-560

Z-680

KPM 5.1

I have been using the same 4.1 speaker system from creative since 1998, still have no need to upgrade. I don't watch DVD's or play any games that use anything more than 4.1.

CL Megaworks THX 550.

Z-560

Home theatre receiver/speakers. Or headphones... gotta have headphones.

Altec Lansing ACS54

I was curious what brands the majority of people had. Instead of Swan I should have had Audiophile: headphones and speakers.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THESANTINI
I was curious what brands the majority of people had. Instead of Swan I should have had Audiophile: headphones and speakers.

---

lol.
You're misled by the term 'audiophile.'

i got z340 but planning to get z560

If I could vote I would say other...goin HT style.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by CrawlingEye


lol.
You're misled by the term 'audiophile.'

---

Its too broad of a term...Lover of Sound? That could have many meanings.

B&W DM602s.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Isezumi

Its too broad of a term...Lover of Sound? That could have many meanings.

---

I completely agree. I doubt you'd find any audiophiles using PC speakers, let alone actual speakers.

The more likely configuration is two powered studio monitors, that have true flat sound with something like a Crest poweramp.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by CrawlingEye


I completely agree. I doubt you'd find any audiophiles using PC speakers, let alone actual speakers.

The more likely configuration is two powered studio monitors, that have true flat sound with something like a Crest poweramp.

---

I thought active monitors don't need an amp!!! :confused:

Aren't most of those monitors bookshelves? I hate bookshelves. They don't image as well as towers. Their small size kills the feeling of a sound stage. With towers, when I listen to an accoustic guitar, I imagine it right in front of me (with the same size). With bookshelves, I imagine a tiny guitar playing the tune. (With Bose Acoutimass speakers, I imagine a cockroach playing a guitar tune with its legs :D couldn't resist saying that :p)

uh, two Boston Acoustic towers (forgot the model) under my desk, two Yamaha NSA770 bookshelves on top, a Gemini PVX20 preamp, an old Pioneer SX660 receiver powering the Yamahas, and a homebrew amp powering the Boston Acoustics. i only know the model no.'s because they're right in front of me.

in any case, it's not nearly studio-quality but better than most multimedia systems. it sounds good enough for me, in any case (although the Pioneer is damned noisy). if i can find another straight amp to hook up to the preamp i'll switch out the Pioneer.

i'm sure y'all care :p

Quote:

---

Originally posted by k_hectic


I thought active monitors don't need an amp!!! :confused:

Aren't most of those monitors bookshelves? I hate bookshelves. They don't image as well as towers. Their small size kills the feeling of a sound stage. With towers, when I listen to an accoustic guitar, I imagine it right in front of me (with the same size). With bookshelves, I imagine a tiny guitar playing the tune. (With Bose Acoutimass speakers, I imagine a cockroach playing a guitar tune with its legs :D couldn't resist saying that :p)

---

lol, good point. :p

I have Wharfedale Diamond 8.2 speakers at the minute.

http://www.sorishop.com/img/img_S5827.jpg

Soon hoping to acquire some Quad 11L.

https://www.sharkyforums.com/images/...2003/01/13.jpg