Thx :) Now I just gotta up the fsb somehow...although my ram doesn't seem to like anything over 210 in DC, should I try it in single/take out one stick?
Printable View
Thx :) Now I just gotta up the fsb somehow...although my ram doesn't seem to like anything over 210 in DC, should I try it in single/take out one stick?
THe AMD platform doesn't seem to benefit as much as the P4 when running dual channel so if you can get the FSB a lot higher in single channel, you may get better performance. I guess you'll have to try! :)
Aha, another question: how do you change the LOD thing with Riva/Rage3d? Couldn't find it on either. How much does that help?
Quote:
Originally posted by Colossus
Great... Well post it in valid format :D
ex.
CPU: P4 3.0C
MHZ: 3000
MEM: 2 sticks of Corsair DDR400 512MB PC-3200 C2 XMS
VC: eVGA 5900 Ultra
Stock Core: 500
OC Core: n/a
Stock Mem: 900
OC Mem: n/a
Cooling: stock
3DMark03 Score: 6712
3DMark01 Score: n/a
Links:
here ya go
I use '03 basically to tell the difference between Drivers. That's about it.Quote:
Originally posted by Alientank
I know I said I'd do 03 but since I have no care for 03 and the focus is on 01 with most everyone, I'll stick with 01 :)
Done!Quote:
Originally posted by ishak540m
Great work! Now I got to publish a few new scores of my own :)
back in 8th in 03 already. i knew it.
Wasn't going to submit any new scores yet, but I think publishing these killed my old score links. :confused: Hopefully there's still more to come.
CPU: P4c
Stock Speed of CPU: 2.8 Ghz
Overclocked speed of CPU: 3.5
MotherBoard: Abit IC7
Ram: Corsair XMS3200LL, 2x256, 2,3,2,6
Video Card: 9800Pro
Stock Core of Video: 378
Actual Core of Video: 459
Stock Mem of Video: 337.5
Actual Mem of Video: 369
Cooling Used: SLK-900, TTGiantII
3dm01se: 21125
edit: ignore, I can publish multiple 01's, but I haven't bought an '03 license. I fixed the old '03 score posted on the 3dmark team site. I'll submit a new '03 later.
Colossus and others, I tried running the tests in different orders, all orders and my score dropped by 100 marks. From what I speak from experience, car chase must be run first reguardless of anything else or I lose several fps off car chase :eek: I tried lobby first then car chase, lobby went up 2fps, car went down 6fps. doesnt work that way for me. Maybe it does for some of you, but not me :( I cant get any higher, looks like 15k is gonna have to wait a long time
Damn knocked down to 7th. If only I could overclock this rig. lolQuote:
Originally posted by Colossus
Done!
Great work! Now I got to publish a few new scores of my own :)
Xduck, we are all waiting for your scores :) the more you wait, the more we will be ahead, wait long enough and ill break 20k oneday, but not that soon :)
Colossus,
When you can,please update me.
Thanks.
CPU:XP 2500 Barton
Stock speed of cpu:1.84
Actual speed of cpu:2378
Motherboard:Abit NF7-S
Ram:OCZ 3500 EL DC 512 MB
Video Card: 5900 Ultra
Stock core of video card:450
Actual core speed of video card:560
Stock mem of video card:850
Actual mem of video card:983
Cooling:Air cooling
Score with link:
3D 01' 18715
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6936066
GRrrrr... everyone's passing me...:(
/eagerly awaits OCZ PC4000 Coppers:D
Ryder, your car chase high details sounds low :confused:
my tbred at 190fsb and 2.47GHz gets me 87fps to
your 84fps and you got a barton at 215fsb and 2.38GHz?
I know its 90MHz slower, but arent bartons worth 200MHz over
tbreds, plus you got 25MHz fsb over me! 3dmark should be ran the moment you load windows and car chase run first, else my scores on that game test is like 6 fps lower. Nice oc on that card, I really think you should be at or near 20k :cool:
Id like to get at or near 20k,i guess its going to take awhileQuote:
Originally posted by Thunderbird1GHz
Ryder, your car chase high details sounds low :confused:
my tbred at 190fsb and 2.47GHz gets me 87fps to
your 84fps and you got a barton at 215fsb and 2.38GHz?
I know its 90MHz slower, but arent bartons worth 200MHz over
tbreds, plus you got 25MHz fsb over me! 3dmark should be ran the moment you load windows and car chase run first, else my scores on that game test is like 6 fps lower. Nice oc on that card, I really think you should be at or near 20k :cool:
to figure out the best way to do things.I run 3dmark in the default order,maybe i should run each test one at a time??
Will be nice when they put out a decent aftermarket fan-heatsink
setup for the 5900U.
T-Bird I get 87.5fps in nature with my cpu FSB at 170 and my cpu clocked at 2.2ghz. ;) :)Quote:
Originally posted by Thunderbird1GHz
my tbred at 190fsb and 2.47GHz gets me 87fps
Quote:
Originally posted by lonewolfroger
T-Bird I get 87.5fps in nature with my cpu FSB at 170 and my cpu clocked at 2.2ghz. ;) :)
nature is all gpu and if you really had it clocked at 305/645 like you said, your nature score sucks. mines 300/590 and im at 83.6fps, just 5fps below you with 55MHz slower ram and 5MHz slower core too. You got far more ram bandwith over me. I get the best score running default order, but you need to reboot then run 3dmark immediately, dont load anything else! hope this helps your car chase
No, it was clocked at 306/631.:)Quote:
Originally posted by Thunderbird1GHz
nature is all gpu and if you really had it clocked at 305/645 like you said, your nature score sucks. mines 300/590 and im at 83.6fps, just 5fps below you with 55MHz slower ram and 5MHz slower core too. You got far more ram bandwith over me. I get the best score running default order, but you need to reboot then run 3dmark immediately, dont load anything else! hope this helps your car chase
Trust me Nature doesn't scale like you'd think. There's an area of diminishing returns. I get all of 3-4FPS more going from 374 to 400MHz core...:( :o
I believe on my run with the ram at 645 I only got about two more fps, it was around 89.6fps.Quote:
Originally posted by Chuck232
Trust me Nature doesn't scale like you'd think. There's an area of diminishing returns. I get all of 3-4FPS more going from 374 to 400MHz core...:( :o
then its time to update your sig cause your ram isnt 621, its 645 :) you got an outdated sig too
I said that I got that score(around 89.6) when I was running my ram at 645, I did not say that I am running my ram at 645 right now. There are some changes I need to make to my sig. but the 306/621 is not one of them. Do you run your video card at the highest you can OC it all the time. Edit: Sig. fixed it will change again when I get my 8rda+.;)Quote:
Originally posted by Thunderbird1GHz
then its time to update your sig cause your ram isnt 621, its 645 :) you got an outdated sig too
all the overclocks and scores in my sig are max clocks, but obviously I dont run em at max most of the time, but makes it look good for bragging rights. I would say this: max oc: 306/645, normal oc: 300/620 or whatever :)
You mean like I have it now.:DQuote:
Originally posted by Thunderbird1GHz
all the overclocks and scores in my sig are max clocks, but obviously I dont run em at max most of the time, but makes it look good for bragging rights. I would say this: max oc: 306/645, normal oc: 300/620 or whatever :)
there you go man :D oh and where is Xduck? I wonder what he got now :D