Printable View
Quote:
Originally posted by Colossus
Please my P4 2.0Ghz overclocked to 2.7Ghz probably EATS(tm) your killer rig.
Post some Sandra CPU scores :)
I dont have sandra and besides I care about real world performance, not synthethic tests. find a cpu intensive benchmark. how bout we compare car chase high detail scores? I am at 72fps I think :)
Quote:
Originally posted by Thunderbird1GHz
I dont have sandra and besides I care about real world performance, not synthethic tests. find a cpu intensive benchmark. how bout we compare car chase high detail scores? I am at 72fps I think :)
Hold on.... re-read what you just put... and then sit down and think about what you just said..... "not synthetic tests"... and then.....
how about we compare car chase high detail scores?"
:confused:
Just take a look at my newbie and extreme unoptimized score back in the day :)Quote:
Originally posted by Thunderbird1GHz
I dont have sandra and besides I care about real world performance, not synthethic tests. find a cpu intensive benchmark. how bout we compare car chase high detail scores? I am at 72fps I think :)
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=4917474
Decided to run 3dmark in 1600x1200 with no vid card overclock... and I almost broke 12k... lol
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6635668
I score higher in 1600x1200 than Tbird does in 1024, lol. (I think) :p
I score higher in 1600x1200 than Tbird does in 1024, lol. (I think) :p [/B][/QUOTE]
So, how does that work? 5 marks for every squared matrix factor of 2?
So, how does that work? 5 marks for every squared matrix factor of 2? [/B][/QUOTE]Quote:
Originally posted by hwmicre
I score higher in 1600x1200 than Tbird does in 1024, lol. (I think) :p
Something like that... we all know Tbird knows the exact calculations for how 3D Marks are generated, lol.
Quote:
Originally posted by lostlilchild6
So, how does that work? 5 marks for every squared matrix factor of 2?
Something like that... we all know Tbird knows the exact calculations for how 3D Marks are generated, lol. [/B][/QUOTE]
Well, to be fair, pretty much everyone who's read the manual knows. ;)
What in the hell is going on here with the [/b][/quote] crap?!?!
crap?!?! [/B][/QUOTE]Quote:
Originally posted by KaoTiK
What in the hell is going on here with the
It's called vBulletin is a poor excuse for forum software :)
eh im at 12700 now against your 11850, so games for me run faster at 1024x768 then they do for you at 1600x1200. my 1152x864 is equal to your 1600x1200 but a high res carries a high price :(
I run an Intel 2.8C w/ 2x512 kingston 2700
Sapphire Radeon 9000 Pro (agp 4x)
no overclocking
highest 3dmark2001se score (tuned for performance, not quality): 5200
default settings (mostly tuned for quality): 4800
I get the general sense these are horrible scores though... :-\
Yeesh, that Radeon 9000 must be the MX line of ATi. I got a GF3 Ti200 that did 9544 in 2k1se tuned for performance.Quote:
Originally posted by starcomp
I run an Intel 2.8C w/ 2x512 kingston 2700
Sapphire Radeon 9000 Pro (agp 4x)
no overclocking
highest 3dmark2001se score (tuned for performance, not quality): 5200
default settings (mostly tuned for quality): 4800
I get the general sense these are horrible scores though... :-\
It's alive!
My rig is in the sig :D
20099 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6802628 :D
dont let it die!!! :)