Nice, keep pushing!Quote:
Originally posted by ranger2992
Drum roll please....................... 22086 with the fsb at 270:D
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6915727
Printable View
Nice, keep pushing!Quote:
Originally posted by ranger2992
Drum roll please....................... 22086 with the fsb at 270:D
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6915727
i don't know whether to congratulate you or go into a jealous rage... perhaps i'll do both :D :mad:Quote:
Originally posted by ranger2992
Drum roll please....................... 22086 with the fsb at 270:D
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6915727
I beat if I put the Omega drivers back in my nature would be up there again. My highest on nature was 156.8 and that was using Omega drivers and DX9. I am doing this round of benches with Cat 3.2 and DX 8.1:DQuote:
Originally posted by xDUCK
ROFL, I still beat you in nature with my 18839 score. :D
Quote:
Originally posted by ranger2992
Drum roll please....................... 22086 with the fsb at 270:D
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6915727
Good job! :)
Took ya long enough though... and you're on water? heh :p
Soon enough... I'll enter this 22k race... I give myself a chance... I know the CPU can do more... and I haven't even begun to touch my 9800PRO, hehe :D.
yeah I was looking at your VC clocks and figured you were holding back a bit. You have a lot of room there. I am thinking about taking the chance and removing the shim on my VC. If I do that my WB should make much better contact with the core and I should be able to go higher, maybe 470-480 on the core.
you should try something to get that card faster... maybe it's just your driver/DX version, but even my nature score is better than yours.Quote:
Originally posted by ranger2992
yeah I was looking at your VC clocks and figured you were holding back a bit. You have a lot of room there. I am thinking about taking the chance and removing the shim on my VC. If I do that my WB should make much better contact with the core and I should be able to go higher, maybe 470-480 on the core.
well when I said he would do 22.2k I was off by just over 100 marks, but like eshbach said, his nature scores are a few fps low, that would account for the extra 100 marks there. He did do much better on car chase high details(105 to 113) also like I said, if he reboots then runs 3dmark, saves, reboots, runs again he may break 22k cause of the slight margin of error that probably errored to the low side for him. the V man must be sweating now, one guy may have already eaten him while the others are right on the heels. oh what v did you push thru that p4? I told you could do 270fsb on that thing and I was right :D
Dude... You just cannot give up.. You were wrong as usual... Give it up!Quote:
Originally posted by Thunderbird1GHz
well when I said he would do 22.2k I was off by just over 100 marks, but like eshbach said, his nature scores are a few fps low, that would account for the extra 100 marks there. He did do much better on car chase high details(105 to 113) also like I said, if he reboots then runs 3dmark, saves, reboots, runs again he may break 22k cause of the slight margin of error that probably errored to the low side for him. the V man must be sweating now, one guy may have already eaten him while the others are right on the heels. oh what v did you push thru that p4? I told you could do 270fsb on that thing and I was right :D
Great work Ranger!!!
You dont like the sound of a 92mm tornado as you 3dmark? Hmmmm... Nevermind. ;)Quote:
Originally posted by Colossus
But they are not as good... I am better off with a air cooler then air cooled pelts... They work rather poorly since the amount of air that would be required to cool the hot side of the pelt would be very loud :)
I dont... I dont use it at full blast!!! I keep it around 3200rpm which is very quiet :)
It looks like 270 is gonna be it for now. I will let her cool down a bit and see if there are any tweaks I can find to give me the points I need to catch Vert. Here is my updated stats so you can add me to the database.
Motherboard: Abit IC7-G, Bios 16
CPU: P4
Stock: 2.8 Ghz
OC: 3.78 Ghz
VC 9800P
Stock Core: 378
OC Core: 459
Stock Mem: 339
OC Mem: 380
Watercooled CPU, GPU and NB
3DMark2001 Score: 22086
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6915727
This goes out to all the guys that have the IC7-G. A new Bios will be released this week that should make this board much better. I have heard really good things from people using the beta Bios.
Very nice!!! I updated your score.. I guess its time for some 2003 and a sig change? :D
Quote:
Originally posted by Colossus
Dude... You just cannot give up.. You were wrong as usual... Give it up!
Great work Ranger!!!
I was off by a bit over 100 marks, thats not too bad and if Ranger has listened to my suggestions of running 3dmark several times......
First its more then 100 points.. Second I didnt know you were at his house watching him benchmark... I think he knows a lot more about benchmarking then you...
He knows how to reach his mark.. Well you just fall short all the time and find excuses.. If you knew what you were doing, 15k is cake!
ok I was off by a little :) but like I said, if Ranger did only one run, that could be within the margin of error. also I nailed it when I said he will get 270fsb :) im wrong sometimes and right other times :)