:D :D :D :DQuote:
Originally posted by mellojoe
Oh, and nova: PPPpppppbbbbbbbttttttt! :p
Printable View
:D :D :D :DQuote:
Originally posted by mellojoe
Oh, and nova: PPPpppppbbbbbbbttttttt! :p
Oh yeah DrDeath... more proof that this guy is a crackpot ;)
The following excellent observation was brought up by frontline lamb on a different forum:
I would love to ask this professor about this.Quote:
The real problem with all this is that his experiment ignores the fact the earth is moving. If he moved his particle to 1 second in the future, everything would have moved what, 27 mi away?
This also messes up any go back in time and shoot my grandfather ideas. If you jumped back in time 75 years, you'd pop out in deep space. Unless your time machine was also a teleporter...
Go right ahead. A quick search on Google kindly provided me with his address, telephone #, fax, and email. Take your pick :DQuote:
Originally posted by Blacktooth
Oh yeah DrDeath... more proof that this guy is a crackpot ;)
The following excellent observation was brought up by frontline lamb on a different forum:
I would love to ask this professor about this.
>>>> http://www.phys.uconn.edu/faculty/mallett.html <<<<
As to the actual theory.. I don't think it'll work, I'll just leave it at that.
Jeez, if he can do it, I'll be as nice as possible. Who wouldn't mind winning the lottery every day for a year?
Regards,
Chris
P.S.: The earth moves around the sun. Go back in time till a point around the sun, then go forward in time and stop at 30 years before you left, and voila, wait a few days, and Earth is back where it came from. Just go around the sun enough times until you are back in time enough.
P.P.S.:I know, I know, asteroids at light speed, right.
The solar system moves through the galaxy at tremendous speed, the galaxy itself moves... There's no telling where you might end up if you travel in time.
However, relativity theory tells us all motion is relative, so maybe we would end up at the same spot on Earth :confused:
Heres a Theroy I have .
This is my thearoy for travel and it negates the time rotation problem.
Folded space and harmonic resinence.
We all know space does bend and that the shortest distance between to points is a straight line.
Now instead of traveling from point a to b.
Lets say we just fold the page then punch a hole through.
Viola now the distance is even shorter and the more times you fold it.
Along that line say instead of a to b we go half way or one third you inbetween a and b you`d get time travel.
Without the need for greater than lightspeed travel.
The trick is knowing where a and b are first.
How do you do this?
Harmonic resinence every year our galixy produces a sound and every year it changes!
Now you have your a and b.
Though you`d be limted to the quatium looping .
Aka you`d only be able to travel with in your own time frame.
Also you would not be able to travel foward from your current time but your future self could vist your past self.
I can`t go into further detail in this area till after my tests.
But I hope you followed that.
So what happens if time were to stop?
You've seen Event Horizon too eh? At first this seems pretty cool, folding a page in half and poking a pencil through it. But a page is in essence 2D, at least in this demonstration, while there are 3 spatial dimensions in the real world (theoretically up to 11 from the bit of M theory that I have read). Not to mention the problem of actually folding spacetime.Quote:
Lets say we just fold the page then punch a hole through.
A is a starting point, is it not? I could understand "zapping" something and not knowing where it may end up. Not knowing where the starting point is has me baffled though.Quote:
The trick is knowing where a and b are first.
OK I'm not employed as a physicist, but I have read a fair share of theoretical physics. The Elegant Universe being my latest. I have read nothing about the galaxy producing a sound every year. Why would it produce a sound every Terran year anyway? Does the galaxy care that much about this lil blue planet? And since when does sound carry through space? I know I would have remembered this phenomenon, if I had heard of it. Can you please back up this statement?Quote:
Harmonic resinence every year our galixy produces a sound and every year it changes!
Finally, what is quantum looping? I don't recall that term either.
Good luck DrDeath. May the force be with you.
Thanks for the link jester22c. I sent him an email. If he responds I'll be sure to share it here. His inbox has to be flooded since that story broke. I'm not holding my breath.
Wow, think of energy involved. Thats an engineering problem though. :DQuote:
Originally posted by DrDeath
Heres a Theroy I have .
This is my thearoy for travel and it negates the time rotation problem.
Folded space and harmonic resinence.
We all know space does bend and that the shortest distance between to points is a straight line.
Now instead of traveling from point a to b.
Lets say we just fold the page then punch a hole through.
Viola now the distance is even shorter and the more times you fold it.
Along that line say instead of a to b we go half way or one third you inbetween a and b you`d get time travel.
Without the need for greater than lightspeed travel.
The trick is knowing where a and b are first.
How do you do this?
Harmonic resinence every year our galixy produces a sound and every year it changes!
Now you have your a and b.
Though you`d be limted to the quatium looping .
Aka you`d only be able to travel with in your own time frame.
Also you would not be able to travel foward from your current time but your future self could vist your past self.
I can`t go into further detail in this area till after my tests.
But I hope you followed that.
Good book. Didn't Brian Green write that? If so I got attend a lecture and Q/A session by him a couple of years back. It was really interesting.Quote:
Originally posted by Blacktooth
The Elegant Universe being my latest.
Woohoo russ! I was seeing if anyone would bring up the second law of thermodynamics (entropy always increasing). Indeed it is true, every action induces randomness. If you smash something, you cannot just unsmash it. That would violate the second law of thermodynamics. This is why time has directionality. But time theoretically can be reversed and it may eventually.
There are two eventual demises of the universe theorized (the first is popular now I think). One is that the universe continues expanding until stars run out of energy then everything dies. The other is that the universe will expand to a point then fall back in upon itself. This is where entropy is reversed (to us). The universe would be going from a state of great entropy to an eventual singularity. If you smashed something right before this reversal, it just may unsmash after the reversal. Time would be reversed to us. It would be normal to those that entirely live in the second half though.
I am particularly fond of the second demise. It seems to introduce a cycle into the grand scheme of things. The universe seems composed of so many cycles that it being a cycle itself (possibly even of an even greater cycle) just seems so eloquent.
The dead cant speak, so we don't knowQuote:
Originally posted by clickx17
So what happens if time were to stop?
1.
Read some Professor Hawkins latest on Quantium Leaping.
2.
Quantium Looping is my own Theroy I`ve been working on.
We know that Quantium Leaping says in a nut shell time is like like a spider web.
You can leap from thread to thread 2d or straight across but only in your own time line.
Quantium Looping is basicly the same web but with linked rings aka alternate time lines.
You can again leap only in your own time line.
But you can also hook a loop and leap via the loop to a alternate reality aka a differnt but still the same thread..
This is possable because they must coexist to be.
Aka good does not exist with out evil positive without negative.
3.
Theres this Italian lady professor whos work is sounds produced in space.
Thats where I got the harmonic resinence theroy.
She says that our Galixy not the whole Universe produces a vibration that is recordable yearly.
If I could remember her name I`d give it to you.
4.
You don`t have to fold only in 2d .
I should have stated that more clearly.
You could bend space in a 3d matter like a worm hole .
But I say lets take it one step further you bend the worm hole in a u shape .
Next you bridge in a straight line the gap and now have a even shorter distance.
You repeat this 2 or 3 more times and you have a very short distance.
Yes (Greene), he can explain things to mere mortals like myself rather well.Quote:
Originally posted by nova
Good book. Didn't Brian Green write that? If so I got attend a lecture and Q/A session by him a couple of years back. It was really interesting.
Ah OK DrDeath, I know about quantum leaping. But that only applies if there are multiple parallel universes, which hasn't been proven and I don't ascribe to.
Bummer, about the Italian sound professor info. I would love to read about this. Maybe tomorrow I'll do a lil Google searching, getting late now.
Yes I know about bending spacetime, but it takes celestial objects to do that currently... Black holes doing it to the extreme (and possibly making wormholes). How one proposes to do this locally without destroying the planet (or solar system) is another thing entirely.
Yes, I remember that he was easily able to explain very complex ideas in a way that almost anyone could understand.Quote:
Originally posted by Blacktooth
Yes (Greene), he can explain things to mere mortals like myself rather well.
I was a high school physics student at the time with only mechanics and basic E&M and no modern physics to speak of and I understood almost everything he said. The only part I didn't understand was when he started trying to explain some of the strange math needed for a 4+ dimension universe. I never have been good at math theory though.