Printable View
I paged back a few pages to attempt to figure out your problem. I myself have not deleted the 3.24. It seems you did. I DL'd 3.24 then DL'd 3.25beta and put it in the same folder. From there its the shortcuts to startup, etc and the two add on lines in the target
BTW, I have figured out that percentage increases in cpu speed do seem to mirror reduced folding times. For example, I was pulling along at a very modest 2.16Ghz. I'm on a WU where the increments took me 2m15sec avg. Clocking up to 2.4Ghz or an 11-12% increase caused my increment time to reduce to 1m59sec or about 12-13%.
Bottom Line if anyone increases their cpu speed by 10% of current their folding times will drop by 10% as well. Seems obvious but things are not always so and now I got the evidence to back it up
No, I did not delete the 3.24, I moved it out of the programs folder and tried to use the 3.25, but it would not work so I put it back in, I also checked the image you posted of your 3.25 properties of your shortcut and what I have listed in mine is identical to yours. I might try to get it to work again when I have finished this WU, I`m on. BTW, do you have two cores in your folder listed as FahCore_78 and FahCore_65?Quote:
Originally posted by sapasion
I paged back a few pages to attempt to figure out your problem. I myself have not deleted the 3.24. It seems you did. I DL'd 3.24 then DL'd 3.25beta and put it in the same folder. From there its the shortcuts to startup, etc and the two add on lines in the target
After you finish your next WU delete all your existing cores that's one thing I think is a must. The program will re grab a new one and you should be set
Will do Edit to add: update it worked, I`m now running on Client 3.25 with SSE boost.Quote:
Originally posted by sapasion
After you finish your next WU delete all your existing cores that's one thing I think is a must. The program will re grab a new one and you should be set
https://www.sharkyforums.com/ I love it
Wow we're really kickin' some *** now. This is awesome. :)Quote:
okay, my roomate is running the 3.25beta now. His user name is Ryan, but he's not a member here...is that alright?
As long as he's folding for team #34149 ;)
Woohoo I'm in third place now! :) I'm movin in on ya saps. ;)
I know we're competing against cancer and the other teams, but hey, a little in-team competition never hurt anyone. :)
It would be IMO, imposible to have in-team competition.Quote:
Originally posted by KaoTiK
Woohoo I'm in third place now! :)
I know we're competing against cancer and the other teams, but hey, a little in-team competition never hurt anyone. :)
lol why's that?Quote:
Originally posted by lonewolfroger
It would be IMO, imposible to have in-team competition.
You have four computers going and a lot of us don`t, also the packets we download, come in all differant sizes and give differant points. How can we have in-team competition with so many differant varibles.Quote:
Originally posted by KaoTiK
lol why's that?
I have like 8 computers going, lol.Quote:
Originally posted by lonewolfroger
You have four computers going and a lot of us don`t, also the packets we download, come in all differant sizes and give differant points. How can we have in-team competition with so many differant varibles.
And I mean... if you look at it in that perspective, it's like saying there is no competition at all. Because all the teams are downloading different packets, using different sizes and different points, and all different volumes of computers working for them.
There is competition, but on the team level, against other teams. :)Quote:
Originally posted by KaoTiK
I have like 8 computers going, lol.
And I mean... if you look at it in that perspective, it's like saying there is no competition at all. Because all the teams are downloading different packets, using different sizes and different points, and all different volumes of computers working for them.