Printable View
Quite a while back I saw many reviews stating that the 9500pro beats the Ti4600 WITH AA & AF enabled. The Ti4600 beats the 9500pro WITHOUT AA & AF enabled.Quote:
Originally posted by elite73
Theres no way youve got the 4600 in the right place and Im not saying that just coz I own one. I have seen it with my own eyes outperform a 9500Pro on nearly everything (maybe 5% of current games with full FSAA on and max details being the exception and Im not even convinced at that).
Dont know I just glanced over the benchmarks at Anandtech and theyve got the 4600 beating the 9500Pro on all benchmarks with and without FSAA except for one.Quote:
Originally posted by soupnazi
Quite a while back I saw many reviews stating that the 9500pro beats the Ti4600 WITH AA & AF enabled. The Ti4600 beats the 9500pro WITHOUT AA & AF enabled.
Not that it matters really I just thought Id mention the 4600 was in the wrong place in the line up. :cool:
Yes, I was basing it on FSAA and AA and AF and all that other good stuff.
I would edit it and put pro on the 9500, 9600 and ultra on the 5600. I believe the 4200 does better then the non pro ones.
Please don't be offended. :p I just don't think 4600 is beating the 9500Pro. Those benchmarks were tested back in Nov. 2002 with the Cat 2.4. I think with the newest Cat (3.4) the situation will be different. :) Don't even mention 9500 Pro is a DirectX 9.0 card. The gap will only become wider and larger. :cool:Quote:
Originally posted by elite73
Dont know I just glanced over the benchmarks at Anandtech and theyve got the 4600 beating the 9500Pro on all benchmarks with and without FSAA except for one.
Not that it matters really I just thought Id mention the 4600 was in the wrong place in the line up. :cool:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5556042
The 9500pro is a good performer, its a shame ATI discontinued it.
Well, market gimmick~ :(