51,594
with the 51.75 drivers.
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=501455232
Printable View
51,594
with the 51.75 drivers.
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=501455232
I got a 34,637
Not bad for an AthlonXP1700+ with a RADEON9500PRO. Although they are OCed to their maximums.:p
Compare Link
39000 with my XP at 2400MHz (200x12) and my 9700 Pro at 360/331. Seems a little low, I know I could do better, don't have the initiative to overclock my 9700 Pro and tweak windows, lol.
45,000 here
60967 with 9800 Pro, at the time my cpu score was like #7 on the Arc, back in April though.
73890 with x800 vivo=> xt, never got to finish running that up. :( Will have something better to post soon enough though. :)
just ran it all stock and got like 62k which really sucks... oh well, i don't like aquamark...
Yeah it's the anti-eshbach rig bench....favors Intel and nVidia. At least I only have one of those strikes against me atm. :pQuote:
Originally posted by eshbach
just ran it all stock and got like 62k which really sucks... oh well, i don't like aquamark...
My AquaMark is worse:
only 60k...
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=817384759
Computer Maniac ;)
I did an AM3 run too a few days back......with my rig at 212x11=2332mhz, GPU at 414mhz/1.18ghz IIRC. Scored a little more than 70k, here the link :
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=481733224
Some details for those too lazy to click on the link ;)
AquaMark Score: 70647
AquaMark CPU Score: 10290
AquaMark GFX Score: 10758
Average FramesPS: 70.647
Average TrianglesPS: 21267 K
wait till T'bird comes......he'll proly say something about Aquamark isn't a good benchmark and post his 3dmark2001 score here.....:p
it's obviously not an accurate benchmark if mikeysg, who is well below me in both futuremark benchmarks, is beating me by 10k...Quote:
Originally posted by nanokooshball
wait till T'bird comes......he'll proly say something about Aquamark isn't a good benchmark and post his 3dmark2001 score here.....:p
Auqa mark always favored Nvidia. This was a known facted. This was one of the few that the 5900 could keep up with the 9800Pro in.Quote:
Originally posted by eshbach
it's obviously not an accurate benchmark if mikeysg, who is well below me in both futuremark benchmarks, is beating me by 10k...
Ownage! :p Hey, c'mon, let me have at least one benchmark where I spank ya.:DQuote:
Originally posted by eshbach
it's obviously not an accurate benchmark if mikeysg, who is well below me in both futuremark benchmarks, is beating me by 10k...
Edit, But seriously, AM3 has always favored Intel P4s and/or nV combo...
Mike are you overclocking your system cause at stock with my system i cant past 11,500 3dmark03 .I'm not overclocking nothing maybe that's why ya have better score.
around 20k :D
Yep, my rig was OCed for higher benchmark scores. GPU was at 414/1.18ghz IIRC...not exactly sure though...:o I run benchmarks and then forget all about 'em.:p :DQuote:
Originally posted by clem409
Mike are you overclocking your system cause at stock with my system i cant past 11,500 3dmark03 .I'm not overclocking nothing maybe that's why ya have better score.
Here's mine with the 6800gt@430/1.1
AvgFPS: 65.496857
MinFPS: 29.556667
MaxFPS: 140.000000
AvgFPSRender: 97.426956
AvgFPSSimulation: 199.844070
AvgTrianglesPerSecond: 19715386
MinTrianglesPerSecond: 3127610
MaxTrianglesPerSecond: 45006282
AquamarkScoreRender: 9741
AquamarkScoreSimulation: 9993
AquamarkScore: 65496