Printable View
Download from Fileshark then.... Public download is cap @ 100kb/s
with Flashget and leech, it should go up to 300KB/S average...
link: http://www.fileshack.com/popup_free....fshack02734191
but you have to get in line for like 10 mins last time i waited...
Computer Maniac :)
i have an account with fileshack, free, but cap is 500k. i stood in line for 45 minutes, and the download was about 340k.
its on usenet.... capped at whatever your isp set it to.... took like 5 mins to download
Without SM3.0 your likely to get beat by a 6600GT.Quote:
Originally Posted by ComputerManiacs
469 3D Marks - The fps shown was between 0.25 and 2.25.
hmm,
i notice you have a AIW 9700Pro so i am guessing it was the one you benched....
how long did it take to run the 06 benchie with the AIW?
i know tbird will be reading this soon...
baldy
the test took 10 minutes and 10 seonds. it was painfull to see a once great card struggle to get 1 fps.
www.majorgeeks.com has it. I usually download from there, since you don't have to sign up for anything
Yeah, I grabbed the torrent from them. Didn't go below 100Kb/s.Quote:
Originally Posted by stonez
I want to see how bad it crushes my system, gotta wait on the DLs to finish :)
3076
SM2:1277
SM3:1325
CPU:941
cept on the Red Dragon stage, could hardly see what was going on for crazy coloured trippy lense flare everywhere...
run on my lappy w 9600/9700 mobility Pro 64 meg, a64 3000+, 1.2 gig mem
428 overall
201 sm2.0
760 cpu
avg FPS were 1.625 for GT1 test and 1.724 in GT2 test........
since this is in line with the AIW previously mentioned, it is no wonder Tbird doesn't want to run this benchie, it looked totally pathetic on my lappy, and given the avg frame rates in the cpu test, .239/.386 respectively, need i go further????
if tbird squeaked a 500+ overall score running everything default, i would be surprised........and suspicious :D
baldy
I got 4462.
omg I'm not even downloading it then. That's just ridiculous. I can run all of the newest games on medium settings (similar to t-bird's, except I actually admit it's nowhere near full eye candy), so I am happy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalcium_King
2663
SM2:1032
SM3:951
CPU:1799
good ole 6800gt
mine is really really bad :(
1800 with a p4 3.5ghz and a 6800nu with a completely ruined windows instalation and my normal windows apps running in the background (3.5ghz because my prometeia went for RMA :p)
3DMark - 3962
SM2.0 Score: 1533
HDR/SM3.0: 1536
CPU Score: 1949
Finally got around to running '06.
2663
SM2.0: 1180
HDR/SM3.0: 1111
CPU: 762
A bit better than I thought I'd do. But I don't really care about 3DMark, as long as my computer can play the games I want I'm happy.
Just locks my system up. :confused:
4171 on my workstation. Just a base run, everything running and nothing OC'd and a single 7800.
8313
Sm2: 3835
Sm3: 3551
Cpu: 2126
score :2090
sm2.0:1137
sm3 :N/A
cpu :751
This version is worse than any other I have tried yet. Absolute false information from the total score. Sad to see how many people give the score any credit.
Please continue, what is the false information that you speak of?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ackmed
think it should have the option for turn on/off HDR/SM 3.0...
also my x850XT @ 560/580 is beaten by 6600GT? <-----you can see the false info here..
Computer Maniac :)
Sorry, for double post...my browser freezed on me for about 2 mins...
Computer Maniac :)