I'm also sure he wasn't drunk. Sheesh these guys don't know how to call a taxi when they are drunk?
Quote:
Originally Posted by PriMaTe
Printable View
I'm also sure he wasn't drunk. Sheesh these guys don't know how to call a taxi when they are drunk?
Quote:
Originally Posted by PriMaTe
Well in todays paper it looks like the Faiders have narrowed their QB choice down to Culpepper and McCown. Walter's toast.
I think that at this point... Culpepper is the most proven commodity. If he's back from his injury... and it looks like that he is... I'd have to go with him.
Now Walter... he can have looked awesome... but he is an inproven commodity. I understand that the Raider brass is very high on him... and that's good. But I think that rather than taking this unproven commodity and throwing him to the wolves in the regular season.
He may very well be the future... but grooming him (instead of throwing him to the wolves and destroying his confidence) and letting him learn for 1 or maybe even two more seasons may be the right decision to make.
I've never been an advocate of having a QB start in the NFL before they are ready... I think that too many prospective QBs in the NFL have had their confidence destroyed when they may have ended up working out under better circumstances.
And Culpepper's mobility (which looks like it is recovering) and sheer size may be a nessessity with the Raiders line this year.
Well once Russell signs, Walter's history.
Why would he be?Quote:
Originally Posted by Boneycat
Don't quite a few teams have three QBs on their roster?
And the Raiders think highly of him. And it's not like the Raiders have great depth that they want to keep on the rest of their roster is it?
Because they have Culpepper and McCown ahead of him. The Raiders don't think THAT highly of him it would appear.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spank_Me_Hard
I heard something like Russell doesn't want to play for the Raiders?
Don't be jealous because we picked them and the Lions didn't :pQuote:
Originally Posted by spamjedi
Russell would make 4, though. Can't think of any teams with 4 off the top of my head, except maybe the Bucs, but they're kind of an exception because Gruden is a freako about QBs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spank_Me_Hard
Lets go ravens and please mcnair don't get hurt I can't take another year of Kyle boller
lol, yea...Quote:
Originally Posted by Boneycat
Guys I had my fantasy draft last night what do you think of my roster? I picked #4 out of 12 (serpentine draft).
These are my picks in order. I panicked at the Lendell White pick because I suddenly realized I had 4 players on a bye in week six and needed a RB not on a bye that week. Meh.
L. Johnson (RB-KC)
T. Henry (RB-Den)
R. Wayne (WR-Ind)
M. Lynch (RB-Buf)
D. McNabb (QB-Phi)
S. Moss (WR-Was)
R. Brown (WR-Phi)
V. Davis (TE-SF)
L. White (RB-Ten)
B. Roethlisberger (QB-Pit)
Denver (DST-Den)
M. Turner (RB-SD)
B. Marshall (WR-Den)
J. Brown (PK-Sea)
A. Gonzalez (WR-Ind)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spamjedi
I love the RBs (except White ;) ). McNabb will be great if he stays healthy. I think Roethlisberger will be a great backup. Your WRs are spotty with the exception of Wayne. Scout the waiver wire and try to find the next Marques Colston. Also, your D could get lit up by running teams, but should produce INTs all year. Overall, I'd say you did a good job.
Thanks, yea I almost got Johnson from houston as my second WR but he got taken the pick before me so I took Marshawn Lynch. Oh well. McNabb will decide my fate I think.Quote:
Originally Posted by WolfNoob
Colston got picked pretty high, I can't imagine a league where he doesn't get drafted.
edit: I see you said "next" Colston. Now I get what you're saying ;)
missed my scheduled draft, and I chose the time... "I have no excuse"
but made a big *** trade with a guy who had bye week issues and got steve smith, frank gore and roy williams
QB: B. Roethlisberger, J. Kitna
RB: F. Gore, J. Addai, R. Brown, E. James
WR: S. Smith, R. Williams, D. Driver, T.J Houshmandzadeh
TE: K. Winslow, Jason Witten
K: Adam Vinatieri, J. Wilkins
D: Oakland, Miami
rules -
Passing Yards (25 yards per point)
Passing Touchdowns (6)
Interceptions (-2)
Rushing Yards (20 yards per point)
Rushing Touchdowns (6)
Reception (1 Point Per)
Reception Yards (20 yards per point)
Reception Touchdowns (6)
Return Touchdowns (6)
2-Point Conversions (2)
Fumbles Lost (-2)
I will most definitely be dropping a kicker and a defense,a spot is just too valuable to have filled with an extra kicker and defense.
I won the championship in the 2 leagues I played in last year and a big reason was playing the waiver wire, grabbed colston...also I played a new kicker and defense every week, I would just drop a top notch defense if I didn't like their matchup against a high flying offense and would grab another defense....would choose kickers on teams that struggled in the red zone, cardinals come to mind.... those kickers would get the most work, so matchup an offense v.s a defense, if you think the defense is real good and that offense will struggle = good kicker points
I did this in both leagues and won, takes a lot of time with comparing stats etc but thats what is fun, finding a matchup, banking on it and then cashing in.
edit: also I have seen this too many times...
if you got say steve smith and the panthers are playing the giants, don't play the giants defense! if he scores as you hope then your defense just lost 6 points....doh!
Good call on Josh Brown. He's better than any of those guys back east. He'll put up more points than lots of RB's.:pQuote:
Originally Posted by spamjedi