Printable View
If you click the "All Classes" Link on the top of the Team Page left-side menu you can filter by Intel or AMD as well as multiple other classifications, no 64 vs 32-bit segregation though, atm anyway. It just happens that the default view is "unlimited".Quote:
Originally posted by slavik
this is prolly out of place, but I suggest splitting the results into more categories ...
32bit CPUs and 64bit CPUs
Intel CPUs and AMD CPUs
What do you think?
Hope that helps a little anyway. :)
Sup ppl :)
Finally got off my arse and ran 3Dmark :) I'm sort of in vote as vertices, sick of breaking high end hardware :(
Anyways this is the best I could muster from my old Ti4200, I've lost the resistors for my vmods :jackass: So I might pick some new ones up this week sometime and give it another shot, good for an extra 30 or so on the gpu and 40 ish on the ram. Also I might do a fresh install, this one is about 4months old now and it's on a SATA drive so I'm stuck at 66/33.
What sort of gain this there doing a fresh install like that, going back to no sp1 and 8.1 ?
CPU - 2.8C @ 3793
Motherboard - Albatron 865 PE Pro
RAM - 1 Stick, XMS3200C2 1.2v CH-5 2-3-3-8 2.8v 432mhz
Video card - Leadtek Ti4200 Crap 64mb one, 315,605
Operating system - XP
Cooling - MCW5000, Silverprop Nexus, Silverprop Fusion HL, 2 Jaron Ice Cools, 2 1250's in series
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7833593
Anyways it's the best I could do on the day, any tips would be appericated ;)
Cheers
FaTs
thx :)
Quote:
Originally posted by mikead_99
If you click the "All Classes" Link on the top of the Team Page left-side menu you can filter by Intel or AMD as well as multiple other classifications, no 64 vs 32-bit segregation though, atm anyway. It just happens that the default view is "unlimited".
Hope that helps a little anyway. :)
CPU: Intel P4 3.2c ghz
Stock Speed of CPU: 3.2ghz
Overclocked speed of CPU: 3728mhz
MotherBoard: Asus P4C800-E
Ram: 2 x 512mb Kingston Hyper-X PC-3200
Video Card: Sapphire Radeon 9800 Pro 128mb
Stock Core of Video: 380mhz
Actual Core of Video: 413mhz
Stock Mem of Video: 340mhz
Actual Mem of Video: 368mhz
Cooling Used: CPU = SP94 GPU = Zalman 80HPC
Your scores with links: 03=6470
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2524540
CPU: Intel P4 3.2c ghz
Stock Speed of CPU: 3.2ghz
Overclocked speed of CPU: 3728mhz
MotherBoard: Asus P4C800-E
Ram: 2 x 512mb Kingston Hyper-X PC-3200
Video Card: Sapphire Radeon 9800 Pro 128mb
Stock Core of Video: 380mhz
Actual Core of Video: 413mhz
Stock Mem of Video: 340mhz
Actual Mem of Video: 368mhz
Cooling Used: CPU = SP94 GPU = Zalman 80HPC
Your scores with links: 01=20797
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7834341
skoechle, you're updated!;) You've edged me out on both 01 and 03, nice score.:)
CPU: Mobile 2500+
Stock Speed of CPU: 1833 mhz
Overclocked speed of CPU: 2651 mhz 230x11.5
MotherBoard:Abit NF7 v.2
Ram:1x 512 mb Mushkin Level 11; 2-2-2-11@ 3v
Video Card: Sapphire Radeon 9800 Pro 128mb
Stock Core of Video: 380mhz
Actual Core of Video: 473mhz
Stock Mem of Video: 340mhz
Actual Mem of Video: 400mhz
Cooling Used: Mag 3 -> Dangerden RBX -> JR-120 on CPU ; Video card = lapped VGA silencer
Your scores with links: 01=21202
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7834968
JetForce, you've been inserted into the team database.;) Damn nice OC on the CPU!:eek: But let me get this straight : You'd actually underclock your gfx card mem? Why?:confused: Or was it a mistake, instead of '300', you'd meant to type '400'. Could you clarify.:)
looking at the nature score, that's got to be a typo.Quote:
Originally posted by mikeysg
JetForce, you've been inserted into the team database.;) Damn nice OC on the CPU!:eek: But let me get this straight : You'd actually underclock your gfx card mem? Why?:confused: Or was it a mistake, instead of '300', you'd meant to type '400'. Could you clarify.:)
edit: actually, in the project description, it's listed as 400, so that's what it should be.
Am I nuts or did the top score disappear? I thought the top was an AMD system with like an 8500 score... disqualified or something?
While I'm at it, Mikey, you may want to correct my score, you have my video memory speed listed at 250 rather than 350, might confuse some people.
oz_soth was removed because he is not an active member of sharky's.Quote:
Originally posted by Dantopia
Am I nuts or did the top score disappear? I thought the top was an AMD system with like an 8500 score... disqualified or something?
While I'm at it, Mikey, you may want to correct my score, you have my video memory speed listed at 250 rather than 350, might confuse some people.
CPU: Intel P4 2.8c
Stock Speed of CPU: 2.8ghz
Overclocked speed of CPU: 3798
MotherBoard: Albatron 865PE Pro
Ram: 512mb Corsair XMS3200C2 1.2
Video Card: Leadtek Ti4200 64mb
Stock Core of Video: 250mhz
Actual Core of Video: 315mhz
Stock Mem of Video: 512mhz
Actual Mem of Video: 605mhz
Cooling Used: CPU = MCW5000 GPU = Silverprop Fusion HL
Your scores with links: 01=15094
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7833593
question fats: shouldnt you be beating me in car high and both lobbies with the faster cpu and higher fsb you have over me? your lobbies look real low to me, just trying to help sir.
218MHz SC 2-3-3-8 vs. 229MHz DC 2-2-2-6... of course his is lower...
Dan, my bad....:o Sometimes, I update/insert these scores in the wee hours of the morning, hard to see clearly thru bloodshot and bleary eyes.:p :D I've corrected the error I'd made earlier.
FaTs, I've inserted you into the team database, WELCOME to the team!:D
And guys, if I'd made any mistake about your specs, please let me know...TIA.;)
sorry that was a typo i meant 400Quote:
JetForce, you've been inserted into the team database. Damn nice OC on the CPU! But let me get this straight : You'd actually underclock your gfx card mem? Why? Or was it a mistake, instead of '300', you'd meant to type '400'. Could you clarify.
Gotcha! Updated!!! ;)Quote:
Originally posted by JetForce Gemini X
sorry that was a typo i meant 400
Only run in single channel :) Still trying to figure out what the mem can do in this mobo. I'm only getting about 3500-3600 in sandra at those settings.Quote:
Originally posted by Thunderbird1GHz
question fats: shouldnt you be beating me in car high and both lobbies with the faster cpu and higher fsb you have over me? your lobbies look real low to me, just trying to help sir.
I'm going to try and vmem the mobo and throw my BH-5 in it, it should run at 1:1 285 if I can get 3.65-3.7 from the mobo or I should atleast me able to get my CH-5 at 5:4 running 285 (DC).
Thanks
Edit: I should ponit out that score was only a starting ponit, I swapped in a Raptor, rather than my raid, forgetting that you can't raise the PCI. So I was getting rather PO at that ponit and sort of left it there :) I am going to install on an IDE drive and tweak abit more.
FaTs, can you add a link to the 3DMark team in your sig? I've already inserted you into the team database, you should have a link in your sig, don't wanna get me into trouble with Vert and Pyro, do ya?:p :D
:pQuote:
Originally posted by mikeysg
FaTs, can you add a link to the 3DMark team in your sig? I've already inserted you into the team database, you should have a link in your sig, don't wanna get me into trouble with Vert and Pyro, do ya?:p :D
God your worse than my wife..
jk's and done :)
wow single channel takes a 1000+ point hit in pentium 4 mobos? If you only have 1 bh5 stick, youd be better off with 2 ch5 sticks at 5:4 dual channel will own 1:1 single channel. your ch5 would need to handle 228fsb though. dual channel bh5 at 1:1 would crush my score for sure and id be 2nd place and also humbly congratulating you and eyeing the a64 again ;)
I've got 2 512mb sticks of 3500C2, hopefully they will do 285 1:1. I haven't run they hard since I killed my P4C800-E . The highest I got that too was about 272 at 2-2-2-8 using 3.2v, that was a different cpu though.Quote:
Originally posted by Thunderbird1GHz
wow single channel takes a 1000+ point hit in pentium 4 mobos? If you only have 1 bh5 stick, youd be better off with 2 ch5 sticks at 5:4 dual channel will own 1:1 single channel. your ch5 would need to handle 228fsb though. dual channel bh5 at 1:1 would crush my score for sure and id be 2nd place and also humbly congratulating you and eyeing the a64 again ;)
What are your sandra scores like, just out of interest ?
I highly doubt I'll beat you, my card just isn't as good as yours :)
272fsb at 2-2-2 timings on 3.2v as well? wow......just wow dude. you have the best bh5 ram ever, better than Macci's. I know Macci got his to 279fsb but he needed insane volts, probably 3.6+ even if your ram can not do 285fsb you can just lower it a bit, perhaps to 280 or so. youll lose a few cpu MHz but this is waaaaaaaaay better than running em at 5:4. I do have the advantage of gpu clocks but this will be interesting to see which wins out: your mighty cpu vs. my mighty gpu. and you have the record for both highest fsb on low volts and the highest fsb for 512mb sticks too. many people cant get past 220fsb with 512mb sticks, I needed 3.2v for 220fsb LOL! That ram would be mighty fine on an a64 if I dont mind risking killing the cpu to set record 3dmark scores. 3.2v shouldnt kill the ondie memory controller right away, could be a week or 6 months. I would be very hard pressed to find ram thatll do 270+ fsb with timings better than 3-4-4-8 at 2.9v or less. pc4200 is about the only ram thatll do 270+ with 2.9v the 2nd choice is pc3700 ram that does about 250fsb at 2.5-3-3-7 timings. Im just nodding my head in awe at your ram, makes Macci's ram a joke in comparsion! Mr. Icee is the only guy that broke 300fsb at 2-2-2-5 timings with his ocz ram but the volts was 3.8 I think and they were dual 256mb sticks and he never got a 3dmark run off those either.
LOL I doubt it was at 1:1 then :) It's been nearly months since I killed that mobo :(Quote:
Originally posted by Thunderbird1GHz
272fsb at 2-2-2 timings on 3.2v as well? wow......just wow dude. you have the best bh5 ram ever, better than Macci's. I know Macci got his to 279fsb but he needed insane volts, probably 3.6+ even if your ram can not do 285fsb you can just lower it a bit, perhaps to 280 or so. youll lose a few cpu MHz but this is waaaaaaaaay better than running em at 5:4. I do have the advantage of gpu clocks but this will be interesting to see which wins out: your mighty cpu vs. my mighty gpu. and you have the record for both highest fsb on low volts and the highest fsb for 512mb sticks too. many people cant get past 220fsb with 512mb sticks, I needed 3.2v for 220fsb LOL! That ram would be mighty fine on an a64 if I dont mind risking killing the cpu to set record 3dmark scores. 3.2v shouldnt kill the ondie memory controller right away, could be a week or 6 months. I would be very hard pressed to find ram thatll do 270+ fsb with timings better than 3-4-4-8 at 2.9v or less. pc4200 is about the only ram thatll do 270+ with 2.9v the 2nd choice is pc3700 ram that does about 250fsb at 2.5-3-3-7 timings. Im just nodding my head in awe at your ram, makes Macci's ram a joke in comparsion! Mr. Icee is the only guy that broke 300fsb at 2-2-2-5 timings with his ocz ram but the volts was 3.8 I think and they were dual 256mb sticks and he never got a 3dmark run off those either.
Edit: Damnit I'm goning to have to go and find that mobo now so I can see what voltage it was running... 5:4 would put me at 217 which would seem about right :(
Updated my CPU and mobo.
-got a lot of tweaking to do.
Please update my score when you
can,Thanks. :)
CPU: AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Stock Speed of CPU: 2.00 GHZ
Overclocked speed of CPU: 2053
MotherBoard: Chaintech VNF3-250
Ram: OCZ PC3500 EL 2x256 mb
Video Card:Gainward 5950 Ultra
Stock Core of Video: 500
Actual Core of Video: 510
Stock Mem of Video: 1000
Actual Mem of Video: 1000
Cooling Used: CPU = stock air,GPU = stock air
Your scores with links
3Dmark2001 -
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7855483