Sharkyextreme.com 3DMark Team

Quote:

---

Originally posted by ThAz
Im back with new 3dmark01 and 03 scores :)

CPU: AMD TB 1700+ 11x216
Stock Speed of CPU: 1470mhz
Overclocked speed of CPU:2389mhz
MotherBoard: Epox 8RDA3G
Ram: Buffalo PC3200 (2.5-2-2-5)
Video Card: 9800SE@Pro
Stock Core of Video:378
Actual Core of Video:420
Stock Mem of Video:680
Actual Mem of Video:702
Cooling Used:AX-7 w/80mm Enermax, GPU : stock
Your scores with links: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7049300(18,269)
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1353910(5854)


I love this cold weather :D

---

Updated and great work! That is a 2k difference in 2001se!!!

Flipexed.. Please read the rules to join the club :) If you would like to be a member a link to our database is required in your signature :)

Site - http://www.irydium.net/3dmark/
Rules - http://www.irydium.net/3dmark/rules.htm

Saps: Have you tried benching with 2003 330???? Man, I am having a hard time scoring anything in that... On my GF 4 4400 at 302/685 and my 2.8c at stock.. I was scoring around 1800...

I should of been way over 2000 but it probably has to do with the nvidia fix FM did... Since I was scoring 1999 with 290/665 I believe...

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Colossus
[B]Updated and great work! That is a 2k difference in 2001se!!!

---

Thanks for the update :). I think that i have reached the limit with my cpu, i had to give the poor guy 2.1V to get it 3dmark stable at 216*11 :(.

As for my 3dmark03 score im still dissappointed, this sucky R300 HS is holding me back big time. As soon as i find a Vantec Iceberg4 or some other good GPU cooler at a resonable price here in Finland i will try for 6000+ in 3dmark03.

I´ll be back ;)

Finland? Wow... Cant you just pickup a prommie and have a decked out setup? :)

Hmmm, doesnt the 9800SE have 4 pipes instead of 8? I never really kept up with the SE models vs the Pro/NP...

But with a overclock like 420/351 You should be way over 6000... So I think the biggest problem is the limited video card... Even if you flash it...

ThAz, there's something wrong with your 3DMark 03 link in your sig, fix it dude!:p :D Nice score btw, GO AMD!!!;) :)

Colossus : A prommie is a bit expensive :(, but who knows, if i find one cheap it might go home with me ;)

The 9800SE has 4 pipelines stock, but you can softmodd them to 8, and if you are lucky (like me :D ) they will work without artifacts as a 9800Pro 378/338 stock with 8 pipelines. The only differences are that it´s got a 9700/9500 PCB and HS, and hynix 2.8ns memory.

Something is holding me back, im not sure what it is, but i will start with a new GPU cooler, the R300 cooler isn´t relly made for GPU speeds over 400MHz.

mikeysg : Sig updated :)

Please update my score when you get a chance


CPU:P4 3.0
Stock speed of cpu:3.0
Actual speed of cpu:3.8
Motherboard:IC7-G
Ram:Corsair PC-4000
Video Card: 5900 Ultra
Stock core of video card:450
Actual core speed of video card:526
Stock mem of video card:850
Actual mem of video card:938
Cooling:CPU/Water GPU/AIR
Score with link:22040
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7051261

Good score Mark! :)

Nice score Mark:D :D

Nice work Mark :)

I noticed you switched from HyperX PC3500 to Corsair PC4000? :D

Well I promised to list what drivers worked best for my GF4 4400 and Windows XP under DX 8.1...

Here is the breakdown :)

Setup:
- Intel Pentium 4 2.8c
- Abit IC7-G
- 2x Corsair PC3500 1:1 (2,2,2,5)
- Visiontek GF4 4400 275/550
- DX 8.1
- AGP/PCI 66/33
- Windows XP Pro w/SP1

Drivers:
- 30.82 - 12601
- 40.41 - 13990
- 40.71 - 13993
- 40.72 - 13953
- 41.09 - 14022
- 43.45 - 14109
- 44.03 - 14034
- 45.23 - 13286

Hey, can you move me to the Ti-4600 list and update my rig and scores?
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7051303

Thanks.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Colossus
Well I promised to list what drivers worked best for my GF4 4400 and Windows XP under DX 8.1...

Here is the breakdown :)

Setup:
- Intel Pentium 4 2.8c
- Abit IC7-G
- 2x Corsair PC3500 1:1 (2,2,2,5)
- Visiontek GF4 4400 275/550
- DX 8.1
- AGP/PCI 66/33
- Windows XP Pro w/SP1

Drivers:
- 30.82 - 12601
- 40.41 - 13990
- 40.71 - 13993
- 40.72 - 13953
- 41.09 - 14022
- 43.45 - 14109
- 44.03 - 14034
- 45.23 - 13286

---

Yah for some reason those 45.23's realy lose a ton of ground to their preivous siblings don't they. In my case the difference was a fully K

Saps, Have you used the 45.23 in games? Does your framerate drop? Yes I am all for benchmarking when I can get around to it or if I am curious if I can achieve a score.. But I dont go out of my way with the numbers...

But do you notice any improvement with the latest nvidia drivers? Im running the latest on my GF4 4400, but after seeing the performance drop... I was going to drop back to the set prior to that one... I wonder if there are any real world benefits to the newer ones...

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Ignitionator
Hey, can you move me to the Ti-4600 list and update my rig and scores?
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7051303

Thanks.

---

Please submit is correct format :D I dont want to guess at your configuration and benchmark run :)

So look above and cut and paste one of the other submitted scores and replace with your details :)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Colossus
Saps, Have you used the 45.23 in games? Does your framerate drop? Yes I am all for benchmarking when I can get around to it or if I am curious if I can achieve a score.. But I dont go out of my way with the numbers...

But do you notice any improvement with the latest nvidia drivers? Im running the latest on my GF4 4400, but after seeing the performance drop... I was going to drop back to the set prior to that one... I wonder if there are any real world benefits to the newer ones...

---

Yeah I'm actually running the 45.23's right now. I usually stick with nVidia's newest official set. In real games there is very little difference