The Official NFL Thread

Printable View

Show 25 post(s) from this thread on one page

09-18-2007, 02:09 PM
Spank_Me_Hard

Quote:

He just looks...off to me. He clearly is rusty, but I think he needs to play to fix that.

He does look off.

Quote:

hHs biggest problem is his timing.

I'm not so sure... he was very inaccurate with some of those guys who were open. I'm not sure that timing is what I'd blame. Maybe though.

Quote:

The knee actually looks ok to me anyway, in both games he did a good job avoiding people and buying a little extra time.

His knee looks better than I thought that it would. I think about two months ago he said that he thought that it was like 75%. I doubt that if asked, that he'd say it was 100% right now.

But even though he looked better than I thought... he didn't look like the McNabb of old on the move... he looked a little slow. He seemed to be more of a sitting duck in the pocket than the McNabb that I saw in the past... he didn't break any tackles that I saw... as he has in the past.

I don't know how much of this was good coverage... how much was him being rusty in his reads/timing... how much was him not buying more time with his legs. But you and I both seem to agree that he isn't himself. And it is only two games into the season... maybe he gets better... he has to look better against porous Detroit.

Quote:

The biggest problem is Reid insists on throwing the ball 50 times a game (my initial post says 48, but after looking at the box score and adding the 3 sacks that would make it 51 passing plays).

Reid has made it predicable.

Quote:

The defense simply knows the pass is coming, playaction is useless and the line is having problems pass blocking, because the D-line just does not repect the run and comes after us full bore on every play.

I think that most D lines play to get penetration on most plays. I think that very few play more "read and react"... even against the run. I don't think that this factors in quite as much.

Quote:

Why not let the running game carry the load, last night there where huge holes the few times they did run, and Westbrook looked unstoppable.

The running game looked good... but I think that's because the Redskins were keying on the pass (for the obvious reasons).

Westbrook's numbers would fall once the other team started keying on him (and as you know... would open up the passing game more).

Ohh... and the Eagles REALLY need to get some WRs... I don't think that they can wait. Westbrook looks to be the leading reciever at this point... which is ridiculous.
09-18-2007, 02:40 PM
vairox

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spank_Me_Hard

And the Raiders miss in their drafting again... like Leinhart last year...

LeinART isn't exactly the epitome of accuracy or arm strength... in fact he is middle of the road IMO and guys like him come out every year, Huff was the better pick in the long run.

Johnson does us no good with no O-line to buy time and no one to throw to him, wasted pick unless he feels fine and ok with sitting out for a year or 2 until the raiders get their shiz together.... Rusell was the best pick they could have made logically speaking, getting him to see more than $ signs is another story... he could be a big bust since all he wants is the money.
09-18-2007, 03:03 PM
Spank_Me_Hard

Quote:

LeinART isn't exactly the epitome of accuracy or arm strength...

Many good QBs aren't. People have their eyes glaze over when talking about QBs arm strength... but Joe Montana never had very good arm strength either. The flipside of that is a guy like Jay Schroeder... great arm strength... that didn't translate into a star QB.

Accuracy is more important I think... but even then... in my own opinion accuracy is superceded by the ability to read a defence properly (of which I think that Joe Montana was one of the best ever). I'd rather have the QB be able to find the wide open reciever easier than be able to drop a ball in perfectly in the middle of a reciever surrounded by guys.

And I personally don't think that Leihart was *that bad* in either area...

Quote:

in fact he is middle of the road IMO and guys like him come out every year, Huff was the better pick in the long run.

Matter of opinion I think. Time will tell better. I personally haven't been overly impressed by Huff (not that I have been by Leinhart at this point either though). This is only the second year for each... we'll have a better clue at the end of this year.

Quote:

Johnson does us no good with no O-line to buy time and no one to throw to him, wasted pick unless he feels fine and ok with sitting out for a year or 2 until the raiders get their shiz together.

True... but neither does a QB sitting out from getting injured (or having his confidence utterly destroyed) behind that same line.

As fate would have it anyways... Russell is a complete writeoff for this season.

And the Raiders line didn't look that bad in run blocking or pass protection last game... they don't look like the same O line as last year (with the exception of the stupid penalties... which seem to be a yearly constant).

Early to tell... but the Raiders line may be much better this year. I see that Gallery has been moved to guard. Maybe a brilliant switch.
09-18-2007, 03:07 PM
Boneycat

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spank_Me_Hard

Early to tell... but the Raiders line may be much better this year. I see that Gallery has been moved to guard. Maybe a brilliant switch.

"Maybe better"? Ton's better. I think McCown's only been sacked a few times over two games. Hell last year raider qb's got sacked a few times in just one posession!! Raider WR's are fine between Curry and Porter. Russell was and still is the obvious choice to pick. And who knows, at the rate the raiders are losing, we still may see russell play after turkey day.
09-18-2007, 03:17 PM
Spank_Me_Hard

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boneycat

"Maybe better"? Ton's better. I think McCown's only been sacked a few times over two games. Hell last year raider qb's got sacked a few times in just one posession!!

If so, so much for the "it takes more than one season for an O-line to get fixed, and jell" statement from the past.
09-18-2007, 03:19 PM
Boneycat

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spank_Me_Hard

If so, so much for the "it takes more than one season for an O-line to get fixed, and jell" statement from the past.

Well when an o-line sucks as bad as the raiders were last year, it doesn't take much to get an improvement.
09-18-2007, 03:28 PM
Spank_Me_Hard

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boneycat

Well when an o-line sucks as bad as the raiders were last year, it doesn't take much to get an improvement.

LOL! Yea... no kidding. Nowhere for them to go but up.
09-18-2007, 05:05 PM
vairox

Shroeder threw for over 4,000 yards went 12-4 and to the pro bowl his first year, he got a seperated shoulder injury and never came back from it really... not exactly Ryan Leaf.

Montana was smart and confident...

Sorta like Tom Brady, only he wasn't being relayed all the defensive calls of the opposing team.

now you wonder why the patriots refuse to pay any player big $ ? they don't need to when they can tell their team the play! anyone looks like a pro bowler when they know what is going down... thats why they can throw anyone in and succeed, perhaps that will soon change.

enough with the filming, radio intercepts and signal jamming.... less james bond, more football.
09-18-2007, 05:29 PM
Spank_Me_Hard

Quote:

Shroeder threw for over 4,000 yards went 12-4 and to the pro bowl his first year, he got a seperated shoulder injury and never came back from it really... not exactly Ryan Leaf.

I remember.

Marcus Allen, Bo Jackson, Don Mosebar, Steve Wisniewski, Max Montoya, Willie Gault, Mervyn Fernandez (Swervin Merv... CFL import), Greg Townsend, Scott Davis, Howie Long, Bob Golic, Terry McDaniel, Lionel Washington.

Ahhh... the good old days...

One decent year in Washington too if I recall.

Never knew what became of him (Canadian media doesn't cover things like shoulder injuries).

He was decent (as one Pro Bowl would attest)... but I don't know that he'd ever be great. He did have a cannon for an arm.
09-18-2007, 06:25 PM
MrDigital

Lions are going all the way this year, I feel it.
09-18-2007, 08:02 PM
Spank_Me_Hard

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrDigital

Lions are going all the way this year, I feel it.

BC Lions?

:D
09-19-2007, 10:27 AM
vairox

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spank_Me_Hard

BC Lions?

:D

no, Seibu Lions!

Cowboys sign Thug Johnson, yay....maybe him and T.O can go clubbing together.
09-19-2007, 03:03 PM
Mindwarper

Just read an interview of Mcnabb saying black qbs have to try harder. That they get more scrutiny. I think all qb's get ton's of attetion. McClown is getting calls for culpeper from the fans. Eli gets a lot of notice. In fact almost all qbs get a ton of speculation. The media seems to fawn over Favre, Brady, and Manning. Everyone else is fair game. If anything, I think Mcnabb has gotten a pass from the news on his sub performance. He has never been that accurate and the lack of scrambling is making it show. He is worse without TO then To is without him. He needs a good wideout and needs to be more accurate. I think the eagles were smart to draft a qb. I think they were stupid for not signing Garcia.
09-19-2007, 04:04 PM
vairox

Black QB's MAY be more scrutinized, they are the minority at that position... they dominate all others though.

Rush Limbaugh said the same thing basically, only he said that the media wants to see a black QB succeed (i.e pressures them) and he was called a racist for it and asked to resign from espn, believe me I'm no rush fan.

Blacknabb says that black QB's are more scrutinized (i.e under microscope being examined for success) than white QB's and he just gets called a dumbass for his comments and gets a pass, cause clearly, black people can't make racist comments.

every QB needs a good wideout, McNabb had T.O for a year, Culpepper had Moss, Manning has Marvin (and now reggie).... Tom Brady is different and we all know why now, you can plug anyone in at receiver and make them look like randy moss when you know the defense and now it is apparent why they refuse to pay anyone money, everyone has always talked about how they are so "good" that they can plug in anyone and win....now you know why...
09-19-2007, 04:14 PM
Spank_Me_Hard

Quote:

Originally Posted by vairox

Blacknabb says that black QB's are more scrutinized (i.e under microscope being examined for success) than white QB's and he just gets called a dumbass for his comments and gets a pass, cause clearly, black people can't make racist comments.

I wonder then...

Are whites more "scrutinized" at other positions being that they are the minority? At WR? At RB? At CB? At LB?

What about other minorities... even moreso than blacks? Mexicans? Asians?

For the mostpart here... I think that McNabb is just being a baby.

Show 25 post(s) from this thread on one page