The Official NFL Thread

Printable View

Show 25 post(s) from this thread on one page

10-29-2006, 12:25 PM
Boneycat

Quote:

Originally Posted by monroeski

From what I can remember, if the guy that was right in his face hadn't tipped it, there were like two more guys who would have. Shouldn't have thrown that one.

If you consider 5 yards away "in your face" then you're right. As far as two more guys there as well, you must have been watching a different game.

[/QUOTE]The "spin", if you want to call it that, is that he's a new QB; before that game, he had like 66 yards passing for his career. They know he's going to make mistakes, and definitely some will be pretty bad, but he will hopefully learn from them and continue to get better each week. Bledsoe is a 14 year veteran; if he doesn't have it fixed yet, he likely won't.[/QUOTE]

Thank you for spinning already for romo. This is exactly what I'm talking about, you just happen to be doing it before he even takes the field.
10-29-2006, 02:41 PM
monroeski

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boneycat

If you consider 5 yards away "in your face" then you're right. As far as two more guys there as well, you must have been watching a different game.

Thank you for spinning already for romo. This is exactly what I'm talking about, you just happen to be doing it before he even takes the field.

I guess "directly in his line of sight between him and the receiver" would have been better terminology than "in his face."

Saying that about Romo isn't spinning anything for him or for the Cowboys, it's basically the classic (though not only) reason why any rookie starts over somebody else. No one thought Eli would do better than Kurt Warner right away when he first came in, nobody really thinks Vince Young would give them the best chance to win this year, There were other QBs who could have outplayed Alex Smith in his first year, etc. etc. "Spinning" is trying to manipulate other people's points of view on something, often with misdirection, incomplete information, etc. How does saying Bledsoe sucks and it's time for Romo to start learning involve spinning anything? Jones or Parcells would never say out loud that they have given up on the season (no coach would), but I think it's obvious that they're not going to do much with Bledsoe back there, so maybe any change is a good change at this point, and it helps them build for the future.

The Colts only won one game the first year Peyton Manning started, and he had more INTs than TDs. Troy Aikman was 0-11 in his first season as a starter, with 11 TDs and 17 picks. Elway was 4-6, 7 TDs, 14 picks.

Also, learn how to preview your post, or at least go back and fix your broken tags.
10-29-2006, 03:43 PM
Snakespy

off to the game I go. Muwhahahaahahahahaha
The game of the season is upon us in exactlly 1 and 1/2 hours.
GO BRONCOS!!!!!
10-29-2006, 08:39 PM
Boneycat

Quote:

Originally Posted by monroeski

Also, learn how to preview your post, or at least go back and fix your broken tags.

LOL!!!! That's the best you can do? Personal attacks?
10-29-2006, 09:11 PM
Snakespy

ugh. what a game, what a game. The Broncos D fell apart (mostly Darrent Williams) and our offense was...good. just good. but not good enough.
10-29-2006, 09:31 PM
Boneycat

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snakespy

ugh. what a game, what a game. The Broncos D fell apart (mostly Darrent Williams) and our offense was...good. just good. but not good enough.

I'm sorry about your Broncos. You have to admit though it was a very good game to watch, especially w/ it going down to the wire.
10-30-2006, 12:09 AM
monroeski

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boneycat

LOL!!!! That's the best you can do? Personal attacks?

You picked one sentence out of 10, and said that's the best I can do? Nice selective listening, there. I can see the strength of your argument by the fact that you didn't respond to anything else I said.

At any rate, looks like Romo is doing pretty well tonight so far. The Cowboys just took the lead, and he's kept a number of drives alive so far with his mobility where Bledsoe would have either been sacked or thrown a pick.

::edit::
He also has more yards passing in this game than Bledsoe had in any game so far this year. He had more yards passing in one HALF last week than Bledsoe had in 3 out of the 5 full games he played, though you could chalk that up to needing to pass a lot since they were behind and needed to air it out. Aaaand with that touchdown that just put them up 28-14, they have now scored more points than in any other game this year, except for the games against the Titans and the Texans, who aren't exactly the pinnacle of competition. Looks like, barring a miracle, they'll win tonight, which will be their first win against a team with a winning record.

As for my personal attack of this post, I will take a line from one of Terry Pratchett's Discworld novels - "multiple exclamation marks are a sure sign of a diseased mind." :p
10-30-2006, 12:28 AM
Boneycat

Romo didn't look that bad. The O line actually gave him some time to set up and make some plays. Overall a very good win for the CB's. As to the "picking one line" I was making a point as to how unnecessary it was. It was like someone who is losing an argument's last attempt to sound relevant by pointing to something that has absolutely nothing to do w/ the conversation. Oh and you dress funny. (see how childish that sounds?).

The Raiders beating the Steelers...*** is up w/ that. I say only let Oaklands defense hit the field; their offense sucks ***. Good game for Indy vs Denver. Easily lived up to its hype.
10-30-2006, 12:41 AM
monroeski

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boneycat

Romo didn't look that bad. The O line actually gave him some time to set up and make some plays. Overall a very good win for the CB's. As to the "picking one line" I was making a point as to how unnecessary it was. It was like someone who is losing an argument's last attempt to sound relevant by pointing to something that has absolutely nothing to do w/ the conversation. Oh and you dress funny. (see how childish that sounds?).

It does sound childish, but blatant proofreading mistakes just bother the heck out of me sometimes. If I'm not part of the solution, I'm part of the problem, and all that jazz. :D Still, I put it on the end of a fairly long post of valid points to which there has been no response.

Quote:

The Raiders beating the Steelers...*** is up w/ that. I say only let Oaklands defense hit the field; their offense sucks ***.

I think the Steelers have officially dropped off a cliff now. I didn't get to see the game, but apparently Roethlisberger just looked TERRIBLE. 1 TD to 4 interceptions. Also sacked 5 times, though you can't tell from a stat sheet if that was the O-line breaking down or if Oakland just had good coverage. I was leaning towards saying they should put Batch in for the last couple weeks, and now I think they should definitely give it a shot. This is the defending Super Bowl champs losing to a team that, two weeks ago, many people didn't think would win a game all year.
10-30-2006, 01:16 AM
PriMaTe

great giants game. Today was kind of disappointing as far as games to watch though. Besides the giants, had the jets game, and then the boys and carolina which i wanted to see. But i really wanted to see denver indy which I didn't get.

It looks like the steelers are done and will not make the playoffs. Cower should take ben out and leave batch in. He's had a bad season on and off the field and he needs some time to recuperate. Batch has done pretty well when he's played.
10-30-2006, 01:29 AM
vairox

everybody forgets that the oakland raiders have the best pass defense in pro football, boney.
10-30-2006, 01:45 AM
Boneycat

Quote:

Originally Posted by vairox

everybody forgets that the oakland raiders have the best pass defense in pro football, boney.

That's only because Oakland's offense turns the ball over so much and the other teams taking advantage of it to take huge early leads, that they don't need to try and throw the ball. They just run to burn the clock. Today they had ZERO turnovers. Absolutely out of character for them.

San Diego also looked good today against the Rams.

Ok I stand corrected. Oakland had 131 total yards and one turnover.
10-30-2006, 09:09 AM
gkline

I'm a life long Steeler fan. We have set the record for coming from the Super Bowl to going to the Toilet Bowl in the least amount of time. Sad but true. With the schedule the Steelers have and the way they are playing, it will be a stretch to win 2 more games.
10-30-2006, 10:16 AM
monroeski

Quote:

Originally Posted by gkline

I'm a life long Steeler fan. We have set the record for coming from the Super Bowl to going to the Toilet Bowl in the least amount of time. Sad but true. With the schedule the Steelers have and the way they are playing, it will be a stretch to win 2 more games.

I think losing Bettis hurt a lot more than anybody thought it would, plus everything short of an actual plague of locusts hit Roethlisberger this year. Really, I think they can at least turn this around into a respectable season, just because their defense is good enough to keep them in every game when they are playing well.

I think the biggest overall nosedive I've ever seen is the Raiders, between the AFC championship and the Super Bowl a few years back. They looked great up until the Super Bowl, where they were handily defeated, and after a terrible season the next year it seems like they've been getting worse ever since then.
10-30-2006, 02:01 PM
rabidmoose171

w00t. go cowboys. Romo played pretty well. Lets see if he can keep it up, if he does continue to play like that, and the defense keeps creating turnovers we have a great chance to make the playoffs.
10-30-2006, 05:17 PM
2630Goon

Dallas clearly has the best QB now since aikman left.The qb position has been the cowboy's problem ever since aikman left.Goodbye blitzing defenses LOL!!!
10-30-2006, 06:13 PM
monroeski

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2630Goon

Dallas clearly has the best QB now since aikman left.The qb position has been the cowboy's problem ever since aikman left.Goodbye blitzing defenses LOL!!!

I don't know that I'd go THAT far; it has just been 1.5 games. Even Quincy Carter looked pretty good at times :D . He even led them to the playoffs one year, before he got sent to the bench in favor of Vinnie freaking Testaverde. :D
10-30-2006, 10:57 PM
r'aggro

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabidmoose171

we have a great chance to make the playoffs.

Wish we did; just lost two games in a row to mediocre teams.

Effing Madden curse. Effing SB loser's slump. :/ Boo hoo for me, even my hockey team is terrible this year. :D
10-31-2006, 12:34 AM
senorgotti

My fantasy team was loosing by over 40 points but Brady is having such a monster game I won. Best comeback ever. The only reason I'm watching this boring blowout.
10-31-2006, 04:40 AM
Boneycat

The Patriots have another good team this year. Brady isn't a flashy QB, but boy is he ever efficient. He just seems to get the job done.

On a side note, I just noticed that the Raiders have another MNF game next week against Seattle. WTFu is up w/ that? MNF used to be regulated to only good teams and match ups. Last time I checked, the Raiders were like 4-12 last year. Why would they give the Raiders TWO MNF games? (yea and I'm a huge Raider fan too, but I know a crappy team when I see one, and they've been crappy for 4 years now)
11-01-2006, 06:51 AM
hongsc

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boneycat

The Patriots have another good team this year. Brady isn't a flashy QB, but boy is he ever efficient. He just seems to get the job done.

On a side note, I just noticed that the Raiders have another MNF game next week against Seattle. WTFu is up w/ that? MNF used to be regulated to only good teams and match ups. Last time I checked, the Raiders were like 4-12 last year. Why would they give the Raiders TWO MNF games? (yea and I'm a huge Raider fan too, but I know a crappy team when I see one, and they've been crappy for 4 years now)

Colts Vs Patriots should be a great game to watch. I'm guessing the reason that the game would be on MNF is because it would be a blow out with a lot scoring from Seattle but who knows now with all the injuries.
11-02-2006, 08:04 PM
Boneycat

Quote:

Originally Posted by hongsc

I'm guessing the reason that the game would be on MNF is because it would be a blow out with a lot scoring from Seattle but who knows now with all the injuries.

No one wants a blow out; people will get bored and stop watching hence low ratings. It's all about close nailbiting games. In the past, these national televised games were reserved for the better teams = high/better ratings. There's a reason why the Lions and the Browns, just to name a few, don't get MNF games. I guess ESPN had expected the Raiders to do a LOT better then they ended up being. I'm predicting extremely low ratings for this one.
11-03-2006, 01:10 PM
r'aggro

The Raiders are one of those teams that bring a nation-wide fanbase, no matter how bad they suck. That = ratings. And with no running game to watch out for, Oakland might actually win it.
11-03-2006, 01:26 PM
Boneycat

Quote:

Originally Posted by r'aggro

And with no running game to watch out for, Oakland might actually win it.

That's mighty optimistic of you. I'm a huge Raider fan, but don't think they have what it takes to win this one. I'll root for them nonetheless.
11-03-2006, 02:25 PM
2630Goon

Quote:

Originally Posted by monroeski

I don't know that I'd go THAT far; it has just been 1.5 games. Even Quincy Carter looked pretty good at times :D . He even led them to the playoffs one year, before he got sent to the bench in favor of Vinnie freaking Testaverde. :D

I sense the second coming of curt warner here with romo and I really mean that.

Show 25 post(s) from this thread on one page