Printable View
You can always put your 4200 score link in your sig. I wish now that I had not deleted my 4200 score on futuremark, I might put it back in and gave you two a score to shoot for.:DQuote:
Originally posted by tituswolf
ahhhh.. wouldn't want to do that... maybe i will just make up another name :D
What was your score? you remember?
I believe it was around 14,680. I was below sapasion but ahead of T-bird.Quote:
Originally posted by icecube_of_death
What was your score? you remember?
oic, not hard to beat :D
It is beatable, but I did get a higher score then you have now, with just a 172fsb :) the score you need to beat is sapasion`s.;)Quote:
Originally posted by icecube_of_death
oic, not hard to beat :D
Lend me sapasion's RAM and I'll take the #1 spot :DQuote:
Originally posted by lonewolfroger
It is beatable, but I did get a higher score then you have now, with just a 172fsb :) the score you need to beat is sapasion`s.;)
but nah, not in the mood of benching... wait until it gets to around -10C outside then I'll probably go again :p
Check out the guy`s memory that is in first place, he used one 256mb stick of Kingston PC2700 value memory.:)Quote:
Originally posted by icecube_of_death
Lend me sapasion's RAM and I'll take the #1 spot :D
but nah, not in the mood of benching... wait until it gets to around -10C outside then I'll probably go again :p
That thing is like... Kingston value with BH-5 :eek:
Something tells me they wouldn't put 5ns chips into a 6ns product. ;)Quote:
Originally posted by icecube_of_death
That thing is like... Kingston value with BH-5 :eek:
You never know ;)Quote:
Originally posted by xDUCK
Something tells me they wouldn't put 5ns chips into a 6ns product. ;)
It's about as likely as buying a 2.4C and finding out that it's actually a 2.8C. :pQuote:
Originally posted by icecube_of_death
You never know ;)
Huh? That actually happened?
Nope, and it's on the same level of probability as finding BH-5 in Kingston Value 2700... ;) KHX3000 and 3200, mind you, are a totally different ballgame.Quote:
Originally posted by icecube_of_death
Huh? That actually happened?
What are the chances of those being BH-5? I might be picking up some of those in a while
I think the CL2 3000 are BH-5, while only the earlier revision of 3200 is BH-5 (hard to get).