Printable View
What?? I didn't know Epic stepped aside. Is there a reason they did this? Does anyone know anything about Legend? I hope they keep up the work Epic has in the past https://www.sharkyforums.com/images/.../2005/06/5.gifQuote:
Originally posted by Sol:
Looking forward to Doom 3 more then Unreal 2. Remember, Epic isn't doing Unreal 2... Legend is I believe. https://www.sharkyforums.com/images/.../2005/06/5.gif
Legend is doing the game, don't worry there really good and it's under epics supervision. Personnaly Unreal killed Quake 2 in single player, and UT beat Q3 in multi. But forget all this U2 v. Doom 3 crap, I wan't Unreal Warfare, which Epic is developing..........wait scrap that I really really want HALF-LIFE 2 with a Counter Strike 2 mod, oh yeah.
If QuakeIII's textures didn't look so much like the toytle-heads that come out of my arse....I'd play it more often.
My vote goes for Unreal 2.
------------------
T-Bird 1200/200
384mb PC-133 RAM
ATi Radeon 64mb 5ns @ 216/216mhz
Windows 2000 Professional
Both games are gonna be expensive. Software + vid card + cpu + mobo. All will likely have to be upgraded to play them. Oh I know about the 30fps crap with DooM3 but do you really believe that? I'm getting a little sick of ID's constant array of indoor levels. Therefore I must pit my vote with U2 (not the band).
https://www.sharkyforums.com/images/...2002/02/10.gif C'mon people, what is the matter with all of you...? Trying to keep this thread alive until these 2 games actually come out???? https://www.sharkyforums.com/images/...2002/02/10.gif
------------------
Intel P4 - [email protected]
ASUS P4T i850 Motherboard
3DCool Tornado 1000 Case
256MB Kingston PC800 RDRAM
64MB GeForce 256 Video Card
Kenwood 72X CD-ROM
HP 8230e 4x4x6 external CD-RW
Sound Blaster Live! X-Gamer
Cambridge Sound Works FPS2000
40GB Maxtor 7200RPM ATA100 HDD
17" Phillips 107MB monitor
Intellimouse Optical
Windows ME
I personally think Unreal 2 is going to rock for different reasons than doom3. The platform that unreal will run on will be less intensive. The target for the game according to legend will be around a 500mhz machine that has t&l support. I don't agree almost all of the time on the minimum specs so probably around a 700mhz machine will actually be needed. Doom3 on the other hand will run like a dog on current video cards. Meaning that it will probablly require an upgrade before you can actually play it like it was intended to be. Yes that means spending $400 on the top of the line video card once again. The one I'm waiting for right now is Duke forever. Meaning that it will be forever before it comes out.
Quote:
Originally posted by Thatoneguy:
I personally think Unreal 2 is going to rock for different reasons than doom3. The platform that unreal will run on will be less intensive. The target for the game according to legend will be around a 500mhz machine that has t&l support. I don't agree almost all of the time on the minimum specs so probably around a 700mhz machine will actually be needed. Doom3 on the other hand will run like a dog on current video cards. Meaning that it will probablly require an upgrade before you can actually play it like it was intended to be. Yes that means spending $400 on the top of the line video card once again. The one I'm waiting for right now is Duke forever. Meaning that it will be forever before it comes out.
Also remember Doom 3 is still a long ways away. Unreal 2, isn't it slated for a spring release? Doom 3, I would say MAYBE an xmas, but I am saying spring of 2003. https://www.sharkyforums.com/images/.../2005/06/5.gif
------------------
Icna tpye 300 wrdos per mnieut
Although I loved the Doom games... I'm looking forward to Unreal more. Unreal was absolutely amazing when it was released. To this day, I still perfer Original Unreal graphics to Quake 3. Unreal has to wide open beautiful environments, beautiful skies, smooth gameplay, etc. When I play Quake 3... I'm not sure why, but it feels like I'm controlling a 4 foot tall fat guy.
In any case, I'll buy and play through both. https://www.sharkyforums.com/images/.../2005/06/5.gif
TFC 2 baby! yeah!
wait a minute this is Doom vs unreal... well i dont really like the run in and blast everything type of gameplay
damn but when FFX for playstation 2 comes out.. my computer will probably be sitting idle for a looong time until i finish it.
------------------
EPoX EP-8k7a <-this board kicks @ss!
1.2ghz Tbird 266 AXIA @ 1.33 (133x10)
ThermalRight SK6 and 60mm Delta (40C load)
Crucial PC2100 256mb DDR
IBM Deskstar 60GXP
Leadtek Geforce 2 PRO @ 225/435mhz
Running ROCK SOLID...
<A HREF="http://gamershq.madonion.com/products/orb/?publish_compare.shtml?&project_type=6&dprid=1430382&search= 1" TARGET=_blank>4136 3D 2001 Marks!</A>
Star Trek Armada II will blow both of those games out of the water
https://www.sharkyforums.com/images/.../2005/06/5.gif
------------------
Athlon 1.33 ghz
EPoX 8k7a+
256MB DDR PC2100
60GB 7200 RPM Baraccuda Iv
13GB 7200 RPM Western Digital
12x/10x/32x Iomega CDRW
Voodoo4500 32MB PCI
2500kbps DSL connection
Soon to upgrade to...
768MB DDR PC2100 RAM
GeForce3 or Radeon2
Soundblaster Audigy MP3+
DVD Burner
LCD Monitor
I don't understand some of you guys! Why say it's bad when Doom 3 comes out you'll need to upgrade???!!??
OMG I only wish ALL games would go this far and demand for a faster system. If everyone did this we'd have games that would be 4x better than they are now. I for one am very happy what the guys at ID are doing.
This is why Doom 3 will kill Unreal 2, it's going to be far more advanced graphical game. I'm drooling just thinking about, guess I'll stop now. https://www.sharkyforums.com/images/.../2005/06/6.gif https://www.sharkyforums.com/images/.../2005/08/2.gif
------------------
*******************
Games and Stuff
My Specs
*****AMD Soldier*****
I vote for Unreal II, but Doom 3 will most likely rock too.
------------------
Tweak your Radeon. Get Raid on Tweaker here
Not really... faster hardware drives better looking games, not the other way around. I don't think releasing a game that can't run on today's specs is going to magically mean we all run athlon 5GhzsQuote:
Originally posted by AMD Soldier:
OMG I only wish ALL games would go this far and demand for a faster system. If everyone did this we'd have games that would be 4x better than they are now. I for one am very happy what the guys at ID are doing.
LMAO!!! That's a great description!Quote:
Originally posted by Xevious:
When I play Quake 3... I'm not sure why, but it feels like I'm controlling a 4 foot tall fat guy.
Try setting your /cg_fov to 125. Then it will feel like you're controlling a 4 foot skinny guy hyped up on crack with tunnel vision https://www.sharkyforums.com/images/.../2005/08/2.gif
------------------
-AMD Athlon T-Bird 1.2Ghz 266 FSB
-Taisol CGK 742092 w/ Arctic Silver II and Delta 7K fan
-256MB PC2100 DDR Corsair CAS2.5
-Asus A7M266 (running @ 2-2-2)
-Vision Tek GeForce 2 Ultra
-IBM DeskStar 75GXP 30GB ATA/100
-Creative PC-DVD 5X Dxr2
-TDK CD-RW 12x 10x 32x
-SoundBlaster Live! X-Gamer 5.1
-Klipsch Promedia V2.400
-Happaugge Win TV PCI
-Enlight EN 7237 Mid Tower case
-Sparkle 400W PS
Best 3DMark 2001 Score @ default setting: 4388
Video not overclocked: 4118
Quote:
Originally posted by akiraHz:
So, being the curious cat that i am.. what is all your opinions out there on which game will best the other. Which engine will kick the others @ss, which will have better game play/multiplayer?
post your fingers off
So far I've found the Unreal games to be a lot more fun than ID games.
I loved Quake II, but 3 sucked, and Unreal was better than even QII
As long as these are games, and not just engine tests like Q3 was, I'll buy both of them.
------------------
Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting. (Sun Tzu)