400,000 people, 20 years of use, no increase in cancer rates. I'm not worried.Quote:
Originally Posted by ImaNihilist
Printable View
400,000 people, 20 years of use, no increase in cancer rates. I'm not worried.Quote:
Originally Posted by ImaNihilist
What do you need a 4gig SD card for right now? It has plenty of internal memory. And a classic controller is only required if you want to play VC games.Quote:
Originally Posted by Timman_24
yes you can use the gc controller to play most VC games, on the VC purchase screen it has a picture of the controllers allowed for each gamesQuote:
Originally Posted by taggart6
Quote:
Originally Posted by flutie98
really? Damn..hahah...thats good to hear. Any details on which games support the GC controller?
EDIT: Lifted from wikipedia:
NES, SNES and N64 are all compatable with the GC controller.
Some turbographix and sega gaes are also compatable.
EDIT2:Fro wikipedia:
All current non-snes Virtual games are compatable with the GC controller and wii remote.
Yep. With the GC controller you'll be able to control every virtual console game.Quote:
Originally Posted by rimmerchant
All virtual console games can be controlled with the GC controller. TG16, NES and some Genesis games can also be controller with the Wii Remote on its own (being held sideways).Quote:
Originally Posted by taggart6
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaoTiK
yeah 8800GTX's are SO necessary, might as well get 2 for sli.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaoTiK
Yeah I thought that was pretty lame... (along with other numbers in that post) PCs are already more expensive you don't have to exaggerate it. I agree with your point KaoTiK, but your comparison is ridiculous.Quote:
Originally Posted by UghMAS
Boulder (MEDIA) has corrupted you ImaNihilist, you need to think about moving out of there ;)
You are getting into probabilities that are so small they are negligible.Quote:
Originally Posted by ImaNihilist
I think you just like to pick apart my posts :pQuote:
Originally Posted by remo
Most people will want to play the classic games, and I would. The post was about how much it would cost ME to get started with the wii. You can do whatever you want. Why not get 4gig? Why not get 8gig for 75 bucks? Eventually I am going to need it.
Don't forget Xbox Live - $70.
yeah cause online gaming is a necessityQuote:
Originally Posted by Klashe
Xbox live is 5 dollars a month. Which is 60 dollars a year. I would rather pay for great online than get crappy free online (PS3) or no online (Wii as of now).
I can't help it your posts are so inaccurate :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Timman_24
I intend to purchase a lot of VC games as well, but I have no immediate plans to buy an SD card. With 512 MB of built-in memory, it's simply not necessary yet.Quote:
Most people will want to play the classic games, and I would. The post was about how much it would cost ME to get started with the wii.
I haven't seen any stats on the size of Wii saves or VC file (anyone?), but there's no way you're going to fill that up anytime soon -- even if you were to buy every single VC title currently available.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vairox
for the 360 it is, LIVE is pretty much one of the main foundations of the 360, hell the first screen you see when you turn on the 360 is the LIVE logon screen
You keep saying I, I, I. My post was about ME not you.Quote:
Originally Posted by remo
Inaccurate? How can opinion be inaccurate? You are the only one that consistantly argues with me. Mr. Casual on GoeW :p
Magic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Timman_24
You're welcome to buy one if you think you need it, I just didn't want others to think it was a required purchase. :) At least as far as I can tell, still haven't found any good info on file sizes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Timman_24
I want it because it lets me take my saves games away from my console and lets me store music on it to play on the wii. You thought you knew the whole situation...Quote:
Originally Posted by remo
And if you can minimize the cost of Live (fallaciously, IMHO) by saying it comes to only $5 per month, you can also claim that the free PS3 online service is a $240 value.Quote:
Originally Posted by kpxgq
If you're interested in a console with a hard drive and wireless online play (for the life of the console, say 4 years), the premium PS3 is quite a bit cheaper, huh? $740 for an xbox 360 vs. $600 for a PS3. The PS3 online service is free isn't it?
(300(core)+100(wifi)+100(hard drive)+240(live for 4 years) = $740)
Also of interest (just read this at slashdot):
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory?id=2702500Quote:
scientists in Denmark tracked over 420,000 cell phone users over the course of 21 years in an attempt to determine if the urban legend that cell phone use causes cancer is true. Their results: the RF energy produced by the phones did not correlate to an increased incidence of the disease.
but like tinman said, i am pretty sure that M$ LIVE is alot more fleshed out than Sonys offering. even so, to me, if you look at the big picture, the ps3 is not overpriced.
I haven't even used Live on Xbox 360 yet, but with the Xbox/PS2 online services the biggest differences that made Xbox a lot better were 1.) a global friends list and 2.) free downloadable content for games. The free PS3 online service has this stuff at least:Quote:
Originally Posted by kpxgq
http://www.gamespot.com/features/6161997/p-4.html
The PS3 is not overpriced, I agree with you. For the stuff you are getting, its a good deal. However, it falls to the fact that it has an equivalent competitor at a very competitive pricepoint. Thats the problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by kpxgq
I agree entirely with you that the PS3 is not the overpriced system. In fact, if there's anybody practicing predatory pricing its Sony.
Now its up to whoever better implements those features. At this point in time its Microsoft, Xbox Live is an amazing selling point. With the PS3 its "online what ?". The Xbox has a far better library at this point in time. Most multiplatform release games at this time seem to run poorly or below that of the xbox 360. You can say its more expensive, blah, blah, blah. But apparrently we believe its worth the money and that is what counts. Technical analysis will get you nowhere here. More than likely when you pay for an addon you want, your ten times more likely to actually use the damn thing than if it was included free. The issue is not value for money, but better implementation of features. People pay for quality, those who pay for value shouldn't be buying a next gen console within the first three weeks after release anyway.
This is a good point, but not in the context of this thread (which is called "Man the Xbox360 addon prices are annoying...")Quote:
Originally Posted by Transfurzz