Sharkyextreme.com 3DMark Team

Printable View

Show 25 post(s) from this thread on one page

12-28-2008, 01:24 AM
OS-Wiz

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeysg

OS, I'll update your '06 score but I'm afraid you'd have to run it at the standard 1280x1024, not 1024x768. Regardless, I expect your new score at the standard 12x10 to still spank mine to death.....:(

Edit - Awww crap! I MUST be getting old! :o Mistook '05 for '06......:eek: Will update your '05 score!

Yet another edit - Done!!! You're #1 for '05, now knock me down from '06 and '03 as well. Do '06 first, I'd messed up and inserted your '05 score instead...:o

Geez, you're either getting old, or tired, or both. :D My 06 run was at the correct res 1280x1024, please check again. Better yet, use this one please. I managed to get up to 4.1Ghz on the CPU and upped the vidcard OC a little: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9352706

https://www.sharkyforums.com/images/.../2008/12/7.jpg

I doubt anyone will beat your 03 record -- that bench is very GPU sensitive as I recall, but I'll give it a shot and see what happens.
12-28-2008, 04:19 AM
OS-Wiz

Hi mikeysg, you knew there was NO WAY anyone could touch your 3dm03 score :D You dirty rascal you :D Those 4 GPUs really help on that bench. Here's best I could do, and for some reason it won't let me mark it Public, its valid tho:

Project Name OS-Wiz SharkyExtreme 3DMark Team
Description cpu 4.2 vc 670 / 1090
Status Private Make public
Power supply:
Antec Signature 850wCase cooler:
Processor cooler:
ThermalRight Ultra-120 ExtremeGraphics
card cooler: stock
Benchmark:
3DMark2003Date:
Dec 28, 2008 00:52 CSTProject ID: 6020357
Validity OK

Here's url if it works: http://service.futuremark.com/home.a...&resultType=10

https://www.sharkyforums.com/images/.../2008/12/5.jpg

Did manage to get to 4.2 on the cpu finally and ran another 3dm06, 24179:

cpu: Intel 17 920 @ 4.2 ghz (21 x 190) vcore 1.45, stock is 2.66 vcore ~1.184
motherboard: Asus P6T Deluxe
ram: OCZ DDR3 1600 7-7-7-24 @ 1.64 Vdimm
video card: SLI 2 x 260GTX Core 216
os: Windows Vista 64bit SP1
cpu cooling: ThermalRight Ultra-120 Extreme LGA1366
video cooling: stock

http://service.futuremark.com/result...eResultType=14

https://www.sharkyforums.com/images/...2009/05/25.jpg

and finally broke 20K on 3dmvantage:

cpu: Intel 17 920 @ 4.2 ghz (21 x 190) vcore 1.45, stock is 2.66 vcore ~1.184
motherboard: Asus P6T Deluxe
ram: OCZ DDR3 1600 7-7-7-24 @ 1.64 Vdimm
video card: SLI 2 x 260GTX Core 216
os: Windows Vista 64bit SP1
cpu cooling: ThermalRight Ultra-120 Extreme LGA1366
video cooling: stock

http://service.futuremark.com/result...eResultType=19

https://www.sharkyforums.com/images/.../2008/12/6.jpg
12-28-2008, 06:39 AM
mikeysg

Quote:

Originally Posted by OS-Wiz

Hi mikeysg, you knew there was NO WAY anyone could touch your 3dm03 score :D You dirty rascal you :D

LOL! I didn't know for sure, but I had an inkling.;):D Anywayz, I've updated your scores, you're #1 in '05 and '06, 'grats!:cool:
01-03-2009, 09:27 PM
kaliber

thanks for a cool thread https://www.sharkyforums.com/
01-06-2009, 10:05 PM
OS-Wiz

Well, I've found the max for my vidcards, 720x1140 and I'm afraid to go any higher with the cpu. Couldn't break 22k on 3dmva :(

21807 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=663035

PhysX off for legit post in ORB.

https://www.sharkyforums.com/images/...2009/01/80.jpg
01-20-2009, 06:35 AM
Squirrel Meat

Thats an insane vantage score :eek::eek::eek:

It really seems to LOVE LOVE LOVE dual gpu's and fast quad cores dosent it? Or mabey something is wrong with mine lol. somehow your cpu score is radically higher than mine. like unaturally higher. so is your gpu score lol. ive checked my gpu with other benchmarks for my card and im actually 900 points higher on a better system (good oc) but does just having another vid card add another 10k?
01-20-2009, 09:52 AM
mikeysg

Quote:

Originally Posted by Squirrel Meat

It really seems to LOVE LOVE LOVE dual gpu's and fast quad cores dosent it? Or mabey something is wrong with mine lol.

Nope, absolutely nuthin's wrong with yours. Even my C2Q QX9650 @3.9ghz cannot match his OC'ed i7 920. Vantage seems to love the newer cores....
01-21-2009, 03:42 AM
Squirrel Meat

On a side note, my vid card can take one hell of a beating with vantage-i can oc the CRAP out of it and run the entire benchmark......speeds that make 3dmark06 freeze or restart the comp within 20 seconds. really bizarre actually. had my card at 860/2050/2650 without a hitch...odd
01-21-2009, 09:27 AM
stang10001

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeysg

Nope, absolutely nuthin's wrong with yours. Even my C2Q QX9650 @3.9ghz cannot match his OC'ed i7 920. Vantage seems to love the newer cores....

you have to remember he has 8 threads to our 4 or 2 threads
01-21-2009, 10:51 AM
mikeysg

Quote:

Originally Posted by stang10001

you have to remember he has 8 threads to our 4 or 2 threads

That's cheating!!! :p :D :D
01-21-2009, 06:35 PM
stang10001

tell me about it
01-21-2009, 10:31 PM
OS-Wiz

I did note while slowly pushing up the Bclk that the oc seemed to gain marks faster than any other cpu I had benched (probably because of the 8 threads, 3dm06 and vantage favor multi-cpu systems) -- although it was linear. The dual vidcards only added, this is a guess, about 10 - 15% to the total (can't say for sure because I was slowly bumping up the oc on the vidcards at the same time as Bclk, I know, a mistake :( ). And yes to whoever said or implied it, it is much easier to run 3dmvantage at high OCs than 3dm06. The second cpu test in vantage is tough to run, I needed a higher Vcore on vantage than 3dm06, but overall, 3dmvantage is easier to complete.

EDIT: If you have an nVidia gpu(s) and leave PhysX on, you'll score much higher, but it'll be marked in the ORB as an illegitimate bench. I guess to be fair to AMD/ATI fans, don't flame me on this. Reading the note from Futuremark led me to this conclusion. My score would be at least 2 - 3,000 points higher with PhysX turned on. This is due to the rather extensive PhysX tests in the bench. I guess Futuremark figured ATI and nVidia would be all over PhysX, but that stopped when nVidia bought them out.
01-21-2009, 10:33 PM
OS-Wiz

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeysg

That's cheating!!! :p :D :D

All's fair in love and benchmarking :D
01-25-2009, 08:20 PM
ewitte

Quote:

Originally Posted by OS-Wiz

All's fair in love and benchmarking :D

Except for using hardware physx ;) I hear Nvidia is helping ATI implement it in their cards though, possibly it would get opened up then.
01-25-2009, 11:38 PM
mikeysg

Quote:

Originally Posted by ewitte

Except for using hardware physx ;) I hear Nvidia is helping ATI implement it in their cards though, possibly it would get opened up then.

Well, let's hope so, it'll level the playing field somewhat.;) BTW, I don't recall seeing you post here for quite a while, hope you're doing well.....and benching hard!:cool:
01-26-2009, 10:15 AM
ewitte

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeysg

Well, let's hope so, it'll level the playing field somewhat.;) BTW, I don't recall seeing you post here for quite a while, hope you're doing well.....and benching hard!:cool:

Yeah I haven't even logged on in 1-2+ years lol. I really need to update the stats :)

Edit lol last two posts before yesterday
06-23-2007, 02:57 PM
12-22-2006, 03:08 PM
01-26-2009, 10:55 AM
mikeysg

Yeah, you should.....and it's great to see you back here again, I do miss some of the 'old' boys.:) BTW, with your OCing ability and that rig in your sig, you'd prolly royally kick my butt in '05, '06 and Vantage.
01-26-2009, 11:24 AM
ewitte

Not sure about that you do still have dual GPUs. A few runs in vantage but nowhere near done

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=728146 - 13391 - No physx
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=728070 - 15835 - Phsx

2k3 was about 61k
2k6 was about 19.2k

Done in windows 7 so maybe could get more in vista. I have a feeling they can pull more power out of the 285 with drivers as well ;)
01-26-2009, 09:10 PM
OS-Wiz

Quote:

Originally Posted by ewitte

Not sure about that you do still have dual GPUs. A few runs in vantage but nowhere near done

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=728146 - 13391 - No physx
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=728070 - 15835 - Phsx

2k3 was about 61k
2k6 was about 19.2k

Done in windows 7 so maybe could get more in vista. I have a feeling they can pull more power out of the 285 with drivers as well ;)

Welcome back! And I've noticed a sweet upgrade to your system. Tell us how the 285 works out ...
01-26-2009, 10:48 PM
stang10001

Quote:

Originally Posted by OS-Wiz

Tell us how the 285 works out ...

no we dont want to know how it performs. I WOULD LIKE TO STAY IN THE TOP 5 IN 06. btw anyone noticed im the only one with 1 gpu in the top 5.
01-26-2009, 11:18 PM
mikeysg

Quote:

Originally Posted by stang10001

no we dont want to know how it performs. I WOULD LIKE TO STAY IN THE TOP 5 IN 06. btw anyone noticed im the only one with 1 gpu in the top 5.

I'm psychologically prepared to drop a spot in both '05 and '06 'cuz ewitte's one hella OCer.:eek: Such is life......and benchmarks.:p
01-27-2009, 07:33 AM
ewitte

I'm in another competition so will probably be pulling quite higher numbers :D Lol I think I need a new PSU. If I do upgrade I may get one big enough to take advantage of the trade up program (295 hehe).
01-27-2009, 07:56 AM
OS-Wiz

Quote:

Originally Posted by ewitte

I'm in another competition so will probably be pulling quite higher numbers :D Lol I think I need a new PSU. If I do upgrade I may get one big enough to take advantage of the trade up program (295 hehe).

Now that's the ewitte I remember! <Hmmm, see a trade-up in my future :D >
01-27-2009, 01:59 PM
stang10001

i see wallet pain when i get a job
01-27-2009, 02:32 PM
ewitte

Sorry to do this stang :D This is about 10% tweaked didn't even change out to all the new hardware yet.

CPU - Intel Q9550 8.5*448 ~ 3807Mhz

Motherboard - Gigabyte EP45-DSR3
RAM - 4GB Patriot PC6400 @ 448Mhz 2.0v CAS5
Video card - BFG GTX 285 OC @ 702GPU / 1584Shader/ 2664MEM
Operating system - windows 7

Cooling - Tuniq tower CPU (air) / Stock video

2006 score http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9769774 - 19266

Show 25 post(s) from this thread on one page