And yet that doesn't take into account his:
a) Switching the ball into the hand closest to the opponent. What was his exact reason for that again?
b) His running along the edge of the goal line, and then swerving slightly to be out around the two yard line for a stride or two. What was his exact reason for that again?
Neither of those two actions are intuitive with "running out the clock". He went out of his way to do both.
Nevermind I heard today that he admitted that he was rubbing it in the other team's faces.
Make up an excuse for that.
You obviously don't "get" hockey.
Hockey has always been this way. Even back when sports was a "gentlemans game". When you actually play hockey (which I do), you understand why fighting exists, and most likely agree with it.
There is actually method to the madness of fighting in hockey. It's part strategy (it can inspire your team), as well as part "policing" the game amongst the players themselves. You may think that silly, but it keeps your superstars from getting cross checked in the face by a player from the other team.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tid_8...16E8E8&index=4
A two minute penalty (or as I call them, a "timeout") doesn't deter actions always. Nor does a five. Nor a ten misconduct. Nor a game. Nor a fine by the league. The threat of getting knocked out by a goon on the other team does for many players.
When fighting was more prevelant, there was also less "stickwork" (i.e. slashing, spearing, cross checking, high sticking) in hockey. Today, fighting is down, and "stickwork" is up. There are many who theorize that it's in no small part due to the decrease in fighting.
The NBA is full of "hood rats". The NBA itself has realized this and has gone through measures to try to clean up the image of their game by trying to rid the gangsta element from the game. This has never been an issue in the NHL.
Completely agree. Has to be reasonable.