"Crawling Eye I still disagree with you about rating wattage and THD, I'm not talking about a few watts here and there I'm talking about a 120 watt truly being 40 watts etc, Phaethon hit the nail on the head when he said there is no standard rating method, just look how you can say an amp is 500 watts RMS but normaly a 100 watts, now imagine all the shades between RMS and true watts stats. THD gets just as shady you can rate an amp at .5% THD at 20Watts and 4.0%THD at 40watts. Basicaly you can get whatever numbers you want out of an amp if you try hard enough. We will have to agree to disagree on this cause after years of stepping up the audio ladder (starting with a $150 Sony reciever), these things which I wouldnt have belived have become very apparent and unquestionale in my eyes."
I think I now know what you're talking about.
You're talking about amps being stated as being "80 watts" per channel, when in reality they're more like 40, and the companies are just misleading people to believe that their peak wattage is going to be produces as a constant; without specifiying between peak and RMS ratings.
I agree, many companies can be deceiving. If you keep a keen eye you can pick things like that up. Many companies will rate their speakers at different volumes, too. They usually state the ratings, though. So when shopping, I would make a note of what they're rated at, the distance they're rated from, and the volumes being uses. :)
I'd just make sure to be careful.
