Printable View
No problem. Although I did wrestle with the E.T. or cancer issue for about 0.0000000000001 seconds.Quote:
Originally posted by sapasion
Yeah somewhere we need a list of who's who on the Folding Team. Obviously if your SF name is your folding name we know you. Its people who's names don't match that we need to identify.
Thanks for joining purewire.
What's the uncertainty margin on that time you quoted?;) :pQuote:
Originally posted by purewire
No problem. Although I did wrestle with the E.T. or cancer issue for about 0.0000000000001 seconds.
edit: and thanks for joining!:D
lol smartass. :)Quote:
Originally posted by speedyaxon
What's the uncertainty margin on that time you quoted?;) :p
edit: and thanks for joining!:D
And indeed, welcome to the team purewire! ;)
actually no, never even head of that site til now :confused:Quote:
Originally posted by KaoTiK
Looking at your sig... you wouldn't happen to visit Actiontrip... would you? ;)
Did you go to the site, and see why your avatar reminded me of Actiontrip? :)Quote:
Originally posted by thebove
actually no, never even head of that site til now :confused:
Hey the team in 121st place has us on their threat list. LOL look at the date we pass them.
I think we need some more computing power.
121 ALS Attack Squad
Potential Threats:
Sharky Forums 677 -556 173,459.97 164.02 Oct 2, 2006 02:00 AM
lol, cancer will probably have been cured by then without all the folding. :pQuote:
Originally posted by Thermo
Hey the team in 121st place has us on their threat list. LOL look at the date we pass them.
I think we need some more computing power.
121 ALS Attack Squad
Potential Threats:
Sharky Forums 677 -556 173,459.97 164.02 Oct 2, 2006 02:00 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Thermo
Hey the team in 121st place has us on their threat list. LOL look at the date we pass them.
I think we need some more computing power.
121 ALS Attack Squad
Potential Threats:
Sharky Forums 677 -556 173,459.97 164.02 Oct 2, 2006 02:00 AM
LOL, the rivers2 team in 204 place, has us catching them by the end of this year. It will probably be quicker as more people join.
204 rivers2
Sharky Forums 677 -473 73,276.22 1,445.71 Dec 30, 2003 06:00 AM
Where do you guys see these things?
We use BalckMagic’s Crystal Ball for Windows.;)
But you can find it here too.
http://folding.extremeoverclocking.c...?&pagenumber=1
Did any of you know that F@H bench marks your system and that some of the servers dispense WU’s based on client system speed?
MIN SPEED is set for certain servers with projects for fast machines only. The speed is determined by the client's benchmark. Future client versions will print the speed to the logs so one can know the relative speed.
i've noticed it in the logs, but didn't know what it meant....if you look at the logs where the core is initiated, it usually has a "+ benchmarking" entry before it starts working on the WU.Quote:
Originally posted by Thermo
Did any of you know that F@H bench marks your system and that some of the servers dispense WU’s based on client system speed?
MIN SPEED is set for certain servers with projects for fast machines only. The speed is determined by the client's benchmark. Future client versions will print the speed to the logs so one can know the relative speed.
It explains something that I was wondering about. My best folding machines always seem to get high point units and the slower systems seem to get a lot of low score units.
my last bench was 4108 on an xp1800+, with 12-13min/step WUs. i don't think i'll get one on my 2500+ till the next wu.
comparisons?
>fixed to read 12-13 minutes per step. :)