Printable View
You talking SuperPi? Is the 3 secs that big a diff? I mean, I've a Newcastle on a 754 board - I AM running 2-2-2-5, tho', albeit 6:5 (166).Quote:
Originally posted by rabidmoose171
im on your side, but something must be wrong, i get 33 at 2.5g 1:1... your ram timings suck?
3 seconds is definetely something :pQuote:
Originally posted by hwmicre
You talking SuperPi? Is the 3 secs that big a diff? I mean, I've a Newcastle on a 754 board - I AM running 2-2-2-5, tho', albeit 6:5 (166).
Right, but is that covered by the CPU/Socket difference?Quote:
Originally posted by Kappa2001
3 seconds is definetely something :p
I don't think it would make such a difference :pQuote:
Originally posted by hwmicre
Right, but is that covered by the CPU/Socket difference?
From a post earlier: What's a guy gotta do to get a drink in this town??Quote:
Originally posted by hwmicre
Uhhh, talk about better late than never - is this all I need? Geez, I can be #1 in the hugely populated 6800nu category.....;)
Can I get listed? :)
DOH! My bad.....forgot to check for updates.:o You're part of the team now dude.;)Quote:
Originally posted by hwmicre
From a post earlier: What's a guy gotta do to get a drink in this town??
Can I get listed? :)
No problemo, 'bout time I joined, eh??? :DQuote:
Originally posted by mikeysg
DOH! My bad.....forgot to check for updates.:o You're part of the team now dude.;)
Ya darn tootin'. ;) :DQuote:
Originally posted by hwmicre
No problemo, 'bout time I joined, eh??? :D
I think I'm getting 34-35s with a clawhammer running 2.5Ghz. I've only seen 33s with the SSE patched version. I have medium ram timings. Some of the settings are good, others are OK. It will not take anything but 2.5 CAS. Most of the other settings are tweakable.Quote:
Originally posted by rabidmoose171
im on your side, but something must be wrong, i get 33 at 2.5g 1:1... your ram timings suck?
Eric
Is that 1:1 RAM??Quote:
Originally posted by ewitte
I think I'm getting 34-35s with a clawhammer running 2.5Ghz. I've only seen 33s with the SSE patched version. I have medium ram timings. Some of the settings are good, others are OK. It will not take anything but 2.5 CAS. Most of the other settings are tweakable.
Eric
Yes. Screenshot of timings. Not too bad. I can get to at least 10x260 but I want to finish my watercooling first. Things are a little too hot.Quote:
Originally posted by hwmicre
Is that 1:1 RAM??
Eric
Just another modest update for me, takes me up to 5th in '05 :cool:
CPU: A64 3400+ Clawhammer (212x11)
Stock speed: 2200mhz
O/C'd Speed: 2332mhz
Motherboard: DfI LANParty UT NF3 250GB
Ram: 2x512mb Kingston PC3200 Valueram
Vid Card: MSI NX6800U
Stock Core: 425
Actual Core: 438
Stock Mem: 1100
Actual mem: 1128
Cooling: XP-90/Tt UFO 90mm.
My score(s): 3DMark05: 5832
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=761228
LOL do you have to update your own score when you can just post it? :p anyway amd's roadmap now shows 3500+ Venice, this could look good for new 3dmark records. Ill make a new thread on this
I've said it before, I'm a by-the-book kinda guy....if I ask others to provide proof/link(s), I MUST do likewise, it's the right thing to do. ;)Quote:
Originally posted by Thunderbird1GHz
LOL do you have to update your own score when you can just post it? :p
CPU: Athlon XP Mobile 2500+(1.8ghz-stock)(2.45ghz-oced)
Motherboard: Shuttle AN35N-ULTRA
Ram: 1x512mb pc3200 Geil Value series @ 2.5-3-3-11(220mhz)
Video Card: PNY 6800nu(325/700-stock)(375/869-oced)
Cooling: Speeze Whisperock II cpu cooler and 1x120mm Antec 2600rpm case fan
My scores:
3dmark01SE- 19,020
3dmark03- 10,157
3dmark05- 4,199