Dont start retracting the sucky teams! There are fans out there.Quote:
Originally Posted by r'aggro
Printable View
Dont start retracting the sucky teams! There are fans out there.Quote:
Originally Posted by r'aggro
I don't think having an extra team in a division is gonna matter that much. It's been uneven before. The Raiders moved because Davis wanted either a new stadium or at least a renovated LA Coliseum- to be paid for by the city. When L.A. balked, Oakland bent over and said "come here! We'll give you what you want". The tax payers are still paying on the costs of the renovations to Oakland Coliseum, renovations that really only included luxury sky boxes from what I can tell (it's still really ugly). The city also guaranteed sellout crowds for the first 7 years if I remember right. Of course during that time the raiders sucked so attendence was down forcing the city to pick up the tab on purchasing extra seats.
LA doesn't have a football team yet as the city can't decide where to put the stadium. The NFL wanted a team in there by 2008, but obviously that won't happen. It would appear more then anything that the city doesn't really care if they have a team or not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by spamjedi
Lol, I wouldn't wish that on anyone, really.
LA Coliseum is the place! just spend $300 mill and renovate it to top notch or something.
edit: if the Raiders played at the LA Coliseum where did the Rams play? same place?
Has happened before, but it wouldn't work now under the way its setup.Quote:
Originally Posted by vairox
They wouldn't make a new franchise right now, they'd just move one.
If I remember right, they played in Anaheim. They shared a stadium w/ the (then) California Angels.Quote:
Originally Posted by vairox
Speaking of the Raiders...
Is Robert Gallery a bust or something? I remember when he got drafterd #2 overall everyone loved him. Then Art Shell said last year that if he didnt make the pro bowl he wasn't playing up to his potential.
I thought I remember hearing something about him not playing well.
Only if they add a team. If they move a current team to LA, they may have to rearrange some divisions, but the overall number of teams would stay the same.Quote:
Originally Posted by vairox
Bust as a #2 pick, at least so far, but I don't think he's been too utterly terrible. At least, I should say I don't think you can call a guy a bust when he's on the Raiders O right now. Hard to judge one guy out of the O line by himself when the line is so freaking bad as a whole imo. I guess we'll see how good he really is if they ever put together any semblance of even an average offense.Quote:
Originally Posted by spamjedi
Good move by the Raiders to re-sign Terdell Sands. Huge DT's are were going to be on several teams' list for FA this year; I know Seattle was going to take a look at him.
Shell had Gallery play a different position then what he was used to(I don't remember specifically if it was tackle or guard as I didn't follow the Raiders closely after the first half of the season) for reasons no one really knows. Then he got hurt for a bit.Quote:
Originally Posted by monroeski
he was moved from left tackle to right, to guard and back...he is a bust.
Oh man that sux. He was supposed to be the next Pace or something. If they moved him to RT then guard, that is not a good sign.Quote:
Originally Posted by vairox
I'd like to see him play the position he was initially drafted for.Quote:
Originally Posted by vairox
He started at right tackle in almost every game his first two years, then this year is when they decided to start switching him around. A lot of the time players get moved around because they can't play the position they're at so they're tried somewhere else, but in this case...Quote:
Originally Posted by vairox
you can't count out the coaches for Oakland this past year just being a bunch of incompetent morons. You can't really count out the possibility that the coaches so far his entire stay have been morons, Norv Turner has never exactly lit the world on fire as a head coach.Quote:
Originally Posted by Boneycat
Has Gallery lived up to his billing as the #2 pick and "safest choice" in the 2004 draft? Obviously not. I don't think you can totally count him out of being a good player, though, with what he's had to put up with in Oakland.
Michael Irvin is no longer with ESPN. This news doesn't surprise me at ALL.
did something happen? He does shoot his mouth off doesnt he?Quote:
Originally Posted by monroeski
Link I saw gave no detail at all, just said he's gone. Of course, it was a link on ESPN.com, so naturally they wouldn't want to air their dirty laundry.Quote:
Originally Posted by spamjedi
::edit::
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepu...nflnb0218.htmlQuote:
ESPN decided Friday "as part of an annual evaluation" not to exercise an option in Irvin's contract, it was confirmed Saturday.
I dont really care either way. Commentators on average are annoying. But its funny, you kind of need them. I tried watching a game with no sound but that was even worse for some reason.Quote:
Originally Posted by monroeski
Lol @ Irvin. He's been rewarded for his accomplishments on the field, it's time for him to just go away.
ESPN called Irvin a "Public relations nightmare".... IMO there are a couple other guys that deserved to be in the hall before him, but it's over so.
Norv Turner leaves SF for SD
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2771126
jynxQuote:
Originally Posted by fastitocalon
Dang got me, and my change to blue text puts me behind you.Quote:
Originally Posted by spamjedi
Nice articleQuote:
Originally Posted by fastitocalon
A few paragraphs later.Quote:
Turner had trouble winning in the regular season, going 58-82-1 in head coaching stints with Washington and Oakland.
Make up your damn mind Bernie Wilson.Quote:
Turner had trouble winning in the regular season, going 58-82-1 in head coaching stints with Washington and Dallas