woah....getting higher already....9736 and climbing :D
as usual, check the sig for a compare link
Printable View
woah....getting higher already....9736 and climbing :D
as usual, check the sig for a compare link
Good job man, I would like to see 10K on that thing... push her ;)Quote:
Originally posted by thebove
woah....getting higher already....9736 and climbing :D
as usual, check the sig for a compare link
Boom: http://home.attbi.com/~sapasion/MadOnion.jpg
The combination of my additional winter mod cooling and those new 40.72's has pushed me up nearly 300 points from my previous high. If I could just keep this level of OC at 187FSB/1.97Ghz I'd be quite close to 14K. Still this score is good enough for the front page of my like-type rigs
as you wish sir....Quote:
Originally posted by mystifmagic
Good job man, I would like to see 10K on that thing... push her ;)
10237, go check it out in the link in my sig. man i gotta say that between this fresh install, sp3, and new detonator drivers that actually work (the last being the reason i reformatted & reinstalled), this 'ol computer has really stretched it's legs, and i'm damn pleased :D
Anyone GeForce4 users know if you get better marks in Build 300 or build 330 of 3DMark2001? Back when I had a GeForce3 Ti200 on Build 330 I would lose like 200 points.
Interesting thought jago
As many know I'm up ~300 points recently supposedly thanks to 40.72. However, here's some additional knowledge for you to ponder over. My previous run was 13085 done on a 177FSB with a 310/610 VC on the 40.41's with I believe build 300. Since the last record run I have re-installed XP, added XP SP1, got the 40.72 and this run was done on a 179FSB which is really 180FSB in wcpuid and everywhere else. Oh also since I reinstalled XP I had to re-grab 3DMark so this is now build 330. I mention this to suggest that perhaps the 40.72's are not the sole factor responsible for my gains. Certainly some credit must be given to the 2 extra FSB I am testing with compared to last time. Others will need to weigh in with their results before we know just how much credit to give to 40.72
Good job Saps...couldn't let a Ti4200 win though he heQuote:
Originally posted by sapasion
Boom:
The combination of my additional winter mod cooling and those new 40.72's has pushed me up nearly 300 points from my previous high. If I could just keep this level of OC at 187FSB/1.97Ghz I'd be quite close to 14K. Still this score is good enough for the front page of my like-type rigs
13439
Compare
http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4700119
Great job with that Ti500 ;)Quote:
Originally posted by thebove
as you wish sir....
10237, go check it out in the link in my sig. man i gotta say that between this fresh install, sp3, and new detonator drivers that actually work (the last being the reason i reformatted & reinstalled), this 'ol computer has really stretched it's legs, and i'm damn pleased :D
doh!Quote:
Originally posted by thebove
as you wish sir....
10237, go check it out in the link in my sig. man i gotta say that between this fresh install, sp3, and new detonator drivers that actually work (the last being the reason i reformatted & reinstalled), this 'ol computer has really stretched it's legs, and i'm damn pleased :D
I was just getting comfortable where I was, now I gotta push even harder
I did some comparing with the 40.72 drivers myself in the other thread about someone getting 13K 3dmarks. I believe I posted my results on page 3. I compared UT2003 and 3DMark2001 Build 300 and the 40.72's were just a wee tab slower than the 40.41's in my experience in both UT2003 & 3Dmark.Quote:
Originally posted by sapasion
Others will need to weigh in with their results before we know just how much credit to give to 40.72
Well. I bought a new video card and here is my new score.
8318 is my new score, up from 4857 with my old GF2 Ti.
Not like some but it made my day!!
http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4646633
13499
XP1600+
Compare
http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4700343
2479 on the comp in my sig. I will try and run it on my laptop to see how low i can go.:)
I like to see a compare link to that score. GTS with a 8000 score,Hmmmmmmmmmmm.Quote:
Originally posted by AMD Soldier
Hehe ***? My GTS got 8201, hehe that's kinda funny that's all. https://www.sharkyforums.com/images/.../2005/06/4.gif
Hehe not trying to make fun of you or anything just found that quite amusing.
------------------
*******************
Games and Stuff
My Specs
*****AMD Soldier*****
[This message has been edited by AMD Soldier (edited August 01, 2001).]
That was a long time ago, and could have been a 3D mark 2000 score; 8000 is quite possible with 3D Mark 2000. ;)Quote:
Originally posted by crashed13
I like to see a compare link to that score. GTS with a 8000 score,Hmmmmmmmmmmm.
MadOnion 3d2001Se Mark = 7357
All test run at 1280X1024 w/32bit color.
Specs
-----------------------------------------------
Abit KX7-333
Amd XP 1800+ oc'ed to 1574 (136fsb instead of 133 base)
Thermaltake Volcano 9 HSF
512mb Mushkin PC2700 DDR (no oc)
Radeon 9000 Pro 64mb DDR (oc'ed to 310/310 from 274/274)
Seagate 40gb ATA 100 7200rpm
Ibm 60gb ATA 100 7200rpm
Soundblaster Live Gamer
Memorex 40x12x40
Envision 19" Monitor
Win XP Pro
:eek: :eek: good job dude 375mhz on core:eek: ram is kinda lowQuote:
do you have an 8x-agp board where you can plug the r9700 in???
Perhapse not significant on a world-wide benchmark basis, but very significant to me.
12133
I broke my 12K mark ala software maintenance and general clean-up, and I haven't touched the vDIMM yet. Hats off to Reg Clean and Mem Turbo II!
Thanks man. Yeah my vcore overclock is pathetic because of the stock cooling because this is one hot card. With modified, effective cooling, the 9700 will really shine. I bet I could hit 400/360 with a Cooljag and tweakmonster ramsinks.Quote:
Originally posted by benneke
:eek: :eek: good job dude 375mhz on core:eek: ram is kinda low
do you have an 8x-agp board where you can plug the r9700 in???
just a few more marks over my last score of 10237
10374
switched from the 40.71's to the 40.72's, and managed to squeeze 2more mhz outta my ti500 (267/590
I did some comparing with build 300 and build 330 results.
On a GeForce3 I lost about 200 points going to build 330.
On a GeForce4 I lost about 40 points going to build 330.
Either way you look at it you'll probably get your best marks from using Build 300, at least I did.
I waited for so long for someone to answer my question (I asked like 4 times within this thread) but I guess if you want anything done these days you got to do it yourself :(.
Interesting results nonetheless, and might be enough to give some people that extra bit more to break a certain score.
10264
ti500 265/590 40.72's and still working on more :D
P4 NW 2.0Ghz @ 2.4Ghz
Gigabyte 8IEXP (Intel 845E)
512MB DDR240 (underclocked to o/c CPU)
ATI Radeon 9700 (350 core/ 320 mem)
13000 3DMarks
With main memory clocked @ DDR320
13500 3DMarks
Shows you how much difference faster memory can have on your system performance.
Ah what the hell i'm bored
^Bump^ hehe
will this thread ever die (assuming Admin doesnt delete it!)