Quote:
Originally posted by mynameis
the other is a motherbord, power supply and hard drive that are sitting on a table...
Hardcore! https://www.sharkyforums.com/
Printable View
Quote:
Originally posted by mynameis
the other is a motherbord, power supply and hard drive that are sitting on a table...
Hardcore! https://www.sharkyforums.com/
I thought we would plateau at 8K; then 9K. We're still not consistently over 10K. But with another few cpus we should be. I can tell we're slowing to a plateau though. I'd love to see us match your guys levels. We're both top 25 producing teamsQuote:
Originally posted by Zyzzyx
Over 10k/day! Well done, Sharky! Now to sustain that and reach 70k/week.[
Ya folks are still growing, that's obvious. Gonna be interesting to see where/when you plateau in production.
And I'm still looking forward to seeing ya on our Threats list. I'd much rather see you there than the damn Team MacOSX that's gonna overtake us in January. Hrmph...
well...i'll have my brother's 2ghz tbred folding in a few days, add to that an overclocked(exact speed undetermined) 2500+ that i'm building for my best friend over xmas break, and then maybe another 2500+ that i built for a friend a few months back.
Can you tell i'm an amd fan??:p
i'm with ya man, can you tell i'm an AMD, Epox, and xp1800+ fan? (see sig)Quote:
Originally posted by speedyaxon
Can you tell i'm an amd fan??:p
back down under 10k/day at EOC....come on guys!! we just need a couple more rigs folding for us and we'll be solid at 10k/day....i'm working on another nice AMD system here, but i won't have all the parts til after christmas. :(Quote:
Originally posted by sapasion
I thought we would plateau at 8K; then 9K. We're still not consistently over 10K. But with another few cpus we should be. I can tell we're slowing to a plateau though. I'd love to see us match your guys levels. We're both top 25 producing teams
And remember, once ya break into the top 100, you can use Dyyryath's Stats as well. I use those frequently, together with EOC stats. I like the different sort abilities with Dyyryath's, and the history of what my weekly output has been.Quote:
Originally posted by sapasion
I thought we would plateau at 8K; then 9K. We're still not consistently over 10K. But with another few cpus we should be. I can tell we're slowing to a plateau though. I'd love to see us match your guys levels. We're both top 25 producing teams
1 more dayQuote:
Originally posted by Zyzzyx
And remember, once ya break into the top 100, you can use Dyyryath's Stats as well. I use those frequently, together with EOC stats. I like the different sort abilities with Dyyryath's, and the history of what my weekly output has been.
man, i'm gettin hit with all the big WU's right now....4 of my 5 systems are crunching "big ones"
i've currently got a 683 (60 pointer gromacs) on my main rig, with frame times of 11+ min. this is a rig that can also turn in sub 5 minute frame times on the easy ones :eek:
i've also got a 1029 (51.4 pointer gromacs) on my 1.9Ghz rig, a 256 (53.77 gromacs) pointer on my 1.6Ghz rig, and perhaps worst of all, a 1024 (51.4 pointer gromacs) on my little athlon Slot-A 800 system....poor guy has frame times of over an hour :eek:
should be a nice week of production though :D
Heh, I got my old Pentium Pro 200 dually system going again. For the helluvit I tossed on Win2K and two instances of Folding. Its currently working on two 51.4pt 1026 proteins. I seriously doubt it will get them in before the deadline, but I'm just too damn curious.Quote:
Originally posted by thebove
and perhaps worst of all, a 1024 (51.4 pointer gromacs) on my little athlon Slot-A 800 system....poor guy has frame times of over an hour :eek:
If I keep it running 24/7, I'll probably swap it over to Genome instead of Folding, as they don't have deadlines to meet. And I think its smaller stuff, somewhat 'easier' on the legacy systems.
might have to look into that for the athlon 800 and athlon 1.2 tbird i have running....they're only part timers (especially the 1.2tbird), and i often don't even get a WU out of them in a single week. is there any info anywhere on which proteins relate to the genome project?Quote:
Originally posted by Zyzzyx
If I keep it running 24/7, I'll probably swap it over to Genome instead of Folding, as they don't have deadlines to meet. And I think its smaller stuff, somewhat 'easier' on the legacy systems.
also, and perhaps more importantly, do the genome project proteins count towards f@h home stats, or is it an entirely different set of stats?
Info on projects is here.Quote:
might have to look into that for the athlon 800 and athlon 1.2 tbird i have running....they're only part timers (especially the 1.2tbird), and i often don't even get a WU out of them in a single week. is there any info anywhere on which proteins relate to the genome project?
In answer to your second question. Both count for total WU's.
40gig wd was on sale at newegg for $40 some dollars. And you can get 4 to 8 gig NOS drives for less than $20.Quote:
Originally posted by lonewolfroger
Once I find a cheap hard drive and case, I will have my 1ghz T celeron up and folding, then I will be tapped out.
Well, you have about another week to close the gap and make a race of it. After that, we take this folding stuff to a new level.Quote:
Originally posted by RealBeast
Gus, I'm just running as fast as I can from that Duron 850! ;)
WooHoo, I just figured out that I've picked up almost 400pts on Thermo over the last 4 weeks!
Dude, Even if I fold on every last computer in my home and office.. I still wouldnt be able to catch up to you even if I started at 9K :D with just a week or so left! :D :DQuote:
Originally posted by Thermo
Well, you have about another week to close the gap and make a race of it. After that, we take this folding stuff to a new level.
Welp, the ol' PPro dually definitely isn't gonna cut it. On a protein with an 18 day deadline, its currently looking at 22 days to finish. Time per frame of 5.5 hours! A whopping 15ppw per processor. Now, if I could get it to spread the load of one instance over both processors... Nah... time to have it crank on Genome stuff. Once I get a quieter hard disk anyway. Left it on last night, could barely sleep with that whiny WD disk going.
that's the one i got -- what a beast. 14min/frame on my 1800+. it's still chugging away at its last 7 HOURS :eek: :p i hope that's the last of those for me. :DQuote:
Originally posted by thebove
i've currently got a 683 (60 pointer gromacs) on my main rig, with frame times of 11+ min.
you need a linux cluster. :cool:Quote:
Originally posted by Zyzzyx
Now, if I could get it to spread the load of one instance over both processors...
Finally! Made the top ten on our team:) I knew my daughter's 850 Duron would get me to the top ten!;)
i wonder how that would work on a single system with dual processors? took a peak at that article and it used 2 separate systems...Quote:
yes, afaik you need two (or more :D) separate systems. if i could get my old Dell PII300 back from my sister i would try it with my PII300 gentoo box. :cool: PII600 - woohoo! :p it looks like a cool project, though.Quote:
Originally posted by thebove
i wonder how that would work on a single system with dual processors? took a peak at that article and it used 2 separate systems...
does Zyzzyz have two computers, or a dual processor? sorry, can't keep everyone's hardware straight.
dually pentium pro :(Quote:
Originally posted by serotone9
yes, afaik you need two (or more :D) separate systems. if i could get my old Dell PII300 back from my sister i would try it with my PII300 gentoo box. :cool: PII600 - woohoo! :p it looks like a cool project, though.
does Zyzzyz have two computers, or a dual processor? sorry, can't keep everyone's hardware straight.
so no linux cluster then
that definately looks pretty cool though, i wonder how the performance of something like that would be, if it for the most part, lossless, or if there's a good amount of overhead in keeping the 2 systems tied together.
right. the performance of those clusters is probably common knowledge, but i'd like to find out myself first hand. i would guess there has to be *some* overhead mostly in the form of bottlenecks -- especially if you get into dozens or even hundreds of processors -- but depending on how you implement the cluster, that could probably be minimized quite a bit.Quote:
Originally posted by thebove
that definately looks pretty cool though, i wonder how the performance of something like that would be, if it for the most part, lossless, or if there's a good amount of overhead in keeping the 2 systems tied together.
That is very much like what I am working on, main difference is that each node has a hard drive and mine will have only one drive for X systems.Quote:
Originally posted by serotone9
right. the performance of those clusters is probably common knowledge, but i'd like to find out myself first hand. i would guess there has to be *some* overhead mostly in the form of bottlenecks -- especially if you get into dozens or even hundreds of processors -- but depending on how you implement the cluster, that could probably be minimized quite a bit.
Quote:
Originally posted by Thermo
That is very much like what I am working on, main difference is that each node has a hard drive and mine will have only one drive for X systems.
ooooh, the diskless folding farm? :cool:
Sorry for the wait, but now my finals are over as of 7:45 this morning, so the milestones page has been updated. Congrats Daywalker and vertices on 10k :)