Exactly.Quote:
Originally Posted by rabidmoose171
Printable View
Exactly.Quote:
Originally Posted by rabidmoose171
Wow, I'm not even a Reggie Bush fan but if you think he didn't live up to the "hype" then you're nuts. Hell before the season started he had very little hype, no one even expected him to do that much just be a good backup when Deuce needed a breather.Quote:
Originally Posted by vairox
He was a huge playmaker for the Saints this season, and a major part of why they made it to the NFC championship game. Its not just his stats that impress people either, the whole Saints team gets pumped up every time he does his crazy juke moves to break a run, let alone how the crowd gets loud and jacked up when he gets in the game.
Anyway back to the Heisman thing, I don't agree with him taking money, but like I said earlier in this thread, a crapload of colleges and players do this sort of thing, it just doesn't come to light like it does when its on a grand stage like the Heisman winner.
And Reggie was already voted the greatest college football player last year, how do his actions off the field change what he did on the field? Like I already said, I don't agree with what he did off the field, but that doesn't change any of his stats for what he accomplished on the field.
I really hate it when so many athletes always get judged by what they did off the field instead of what they did on it, classic examples are like trying to keep Lawrence Taylor out of the HoF because of his drug charges, or similar to Pete Rose because of his gambling.
Anyway, I'm done venting for now, you can take away Reggie's Heisman, but if they give it to Vince Young there will always be an asterisk by his name in the history books that states he really came in second in the voting and won by a technicality.
3 good plays? where does that come from. I'm not a Bush fan, but thats kinda harsh.Quote:
Originally Posted by vairox
They talk a good game about Taylor and Michael Irvin not getting in, but there's no way they actually keep them out. The difference with Pete Rose is that he didn't just have a gambling problem, he bet on the sport he plays. Plenty of athletes have gambling problems that they talk about in the open, but when you bet on your own sport, that's something different. He says he never bet on any games that he was in (which is obviously bad because he could throw the outcome of the game to win his bet), but he also went for decades saying that he never bet on baseball at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gar
Not that that's any better. My point is that if he ends up with no sort of NFL career for some reason or another, having the Heisman yanked is all he'll really be remembered for, not really for his great college career. Ryan Leaf was great in college, but what do we all remember about him? The Heisman thing won't be as big if Bush ends up being a Hall of Famer, though it will still be brought up constantly.Quote:
Originally Posted by vairox
Well after last year's performance, I don't think there's a big chance of Bush not making a name for himself in the NFL, unless he has a career ending injury.
Which is why I specifically mentioned injury as a reason for him not living up to his potential. It wouldn't be unheard of for a player to drop off substantially after one great year, anyway. Take away Brees or McCallister's inside presence and he may start looking more ordinary pretty quickly. Remember, it wasn't too long ago that Michael Vick was making Pro Bowls on his way to changing the way the entire game of football is played; now there's been talk of him not improving year after year and possibly getting traded.Quote:
Originally Posted by Boneycat
Yea, but even hall of famers are reliant on the fact that this is a team game more so than any other sport (imho :p). You could have put a hall of fame quarter back or running back on my Lions team last year and they would have been mediocre.Quote:
Originally Posted by monroeski
Which only goes to further prove my point. He could be awesome, but if the Saints turn back into the team they've been for basically their entire history sans last year, that would be a pretty good chunk of an RB's career lost.Quote:
Originally Posted by spamjedi
gotcha.Quote:
Originally Posted by monroeski
as a side note... the wife and I saw commercials for Pans Labrinth the other night and it looks pretty intersting. Its that good eh? I'm refering to your sig btw.
That's a big "if" and you're assuming a lot. I'm not sure what your point is in all of this. The issue at hand is whether or not he deserves to have the Heisman taken away from him, not "if" he get's hurt "if" the Saints start to suck or "if" Katrina Two hits N.O. again destroying the whole town. The bottom line is he broke the rules. Period. I don't give a rats *** "if" he goes down in history as the guy who lost his Heisman. The good news for him is that he has already made his money.Quote:
Originally Posted by monroeski
i think it's a really good movie and twist on the narrative of a fairy tale. The great Yokai War is pretty good as well by Miike.Quote:
Originally Posted by spamjedi
Back to the NFL Reggie Bush is a great player with so much potential and I hope NO will use him more next season. He really really brought hope and reenergized the team and city with his play.
Heh, really, how much more can they use him? He does kickoff and punt returns, RB, and when Deuce is in at tailback they put him off in the slot or as a WR. There's no doubt about his speed and endurance as shown by that first bone crushing hit against the Bears and his 90 yard catch and run in the same game.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongsc
I know they used him in a variety of ways just like USC but I didn't see him a lot in games.Quote:
Originally Posted by Boneycat
Actually, the issue at hand is whether or not it hurts him to have the Heisman taken away from him, and I think it does. Just because he's already signed ONE NFL contract (which is non guaranteed money) and some endorsement deals and had ONE fairly good season doesn't mean that the Heisman is now worthless. If it's taken away, anything short of a Hall of Fame NFL career from him and he basically just goes down in history as the guy that had his Heisman taken away.Quote:
Originally Posted by Boneycat
I agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by monroeski
I don't think the NCAA is done with this issue at all. How do you think USC feels about all of this? Bush got the Hiesman and a fat paycheck. What did USC get? Screwed.