Is It Just Me Or Is NVIDIA's A.A. Far More Superior Than ATI's A.A.???

Whats up Sharkys! I recently just switched from an NVIDIA Geforce3 Ti200 to an ATI Radeon 9600 256mb. I like to run my games on ultra high picture quality. I often like to max out my settings such as, anistropic filtering, anti aliasing, and texture sharpening.

When I had my GeForce3, I maxed out all these settings. I'm more specifically talking about the Anti-Aliasing. I did the same as soon as I switched over to the Radeon. Now... The issue here is... With the GeForce3 at 4xAA and the Radeon at 6xAA, it seems to me that the picture is far more clear with the GeForce3. With the GeForce3, the edges were as smooth as butter. But with my new Radeon, I can still see the Jaggies! Is there something wrong with my settings or does ATI's AA just suck or something.

I might also add that I've been unable to install the Catalyst 3.6 drivers! I don't know whats wrong but when ever I install the Cat3.6 drivers my OS won't fully boot. I don't know whats wrong. However, I highly doubt that this is the main reason why the game is a lot more jaggie. Anybody have any opinions or solutions?

its just you

you need drivers (cats) to enable many functions like fsaa

screenshots taken from colussus' post...

https://www.sharkyforums.com/images/...2003/08/12.jpg

https://www.sharkyforums.com/images/...2003/08/12.jpg

oooh, which post was this? (UT2k3 looks sweet with everything turned up :))

Those screenshots are useless to this thread. The FX's use a different FSAA algorithm than the Pre-GF4's if I recall correctly. I think the GF3 used Super Sampling instead of the multisampling that new GeForces/Radeons use. Super Sampling is better than Multi Sampling that would be why the GF3 looked better. If I'm incorrect, feel free to correct me.

GF2 = Super Sampling
GF3 = Quincunx

r8500 = Super Sampling

FX/r9xxx = Multi Sampling

Quote:

---

Originally posted by kpxgq
GF2 = Super Sampling
GF3 = Quincunx

r8500 = Super Sampling

FX/r9xxx = Multi Sampling

---

For the GF3, I think it went like this...

2xFSAA = Super Sampling
4XFSAA = Super Sampling
Quincunx AA = Multi Sampling

I am almost positive GF3's used Super Sampling for normal FSAA modes.

EDIT: Just did a little research, and I stand corrected. The GF3 Uses Multi Sampling for all modes. Sorry 'bout that. :)

Very weird.

Basic question, did you install the driver then the Cat's Control Panel?

and AA4x should be fine since you will not have a high FPS drop.

cheers

Quote:

---

Is It Just Me Or Is NVIDIA's A.A. Far More Superior Than ATI's A.A.???

---

I'm no ATI fanboy, I buy whatever is the best available card at the time of my purchase. I've had several cards from both card makers, and I think it's just you.

Try knocking down you AA setting and bump up the AF as high as your performance will allow. Does wonders for the clarity when running AA. (try 2x AA, 8x AF)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by KaoTiK
For the GF3, I think it went like this...

2xFSAA = Super Sampling
4XFSAA = Super Sampling
Quincunx AA = Multi Sampling

I am almost positive GF3's used Super Sampling for normal FSAA modes.

EDIT: Just did a little research, and I stand corrected. The GF3 Uses Multi Sampling for all modes. Sorry 'bout that. :)

---

No, I think you mean Super Sampling. Even the GF4 AA modes are SS except for Quincunx, which a MS mode AA. As far as I know, the GF3 is SS AA only.

SS AA does provide a better AA quality overall, but at a performance hit that quite substantial.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Un4given
No, I think you mean Super Sampling. Even the GF4 AA modes are SS except for Quincunx, which a MS mode AA. As far as I know, the GF3 is SS AA only.

SS AA does provide a better AA quality overall, but at a performance hit that quite substantial.

---

According to this article, the Geforce3 used multisampling. Quincunx was actually a form of supersampling.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by kpxgq
its just you

you need drivers (cats) to enable many functions like fsaa

screenshots taken from colussus' post...

http://www.hardocp.com/images/articl...2x4_11_9_l.jpg

http://www.hardocp.com/images/articl...2x4_11_8_l.jpg

---

Jebus Christ, that looks nice. I don't know whats wrong with mine. Whenever I install Cat3.6 drivers it doesn't work.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by KaoTiK
Those screenshots are useless to this thread. The FX's use a different FSAA algorithm than the Pre-GF4's if I recall correctly. I think the GF3 used Super Sampling instead of the multisampling that new GeForces/Radeons use. Super Sampling is better than Multi Sampling that would be why the GF3 looked better. If I'm incorrect, feel free to correct me.

---

Oooooooooh I see. That big of a difference huh? Anybody have any screen shots from an ATI Radeon 9600 at 6xAA?

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 3rd World Gamer
Very weird.

Basic question, did you install the driver then the Cat's Control Panel?

and AA4x should be fine since you will not have a high FPS drop.

cheers

---

Well... I just downloaded the whole package thing from ATI's website. Should I install it separately?

I think I'd rather run it at 6xAA. I'd rather sacrefice the 50 Frames Per Second to achieve better picture quality considering the fact that the human eye can only see upto 72 frames per second. No point in having 250 frames. :::shrug:::

Quote:

---

Originally posted by mikead_99
I'm no ATI fanboy, I buy whatever is the best available card at the time of my purchase. I've had several cards from both card makers, and I think it's just you.

Try knocking down you AA setting and bump up the AF as high as your performance will allow. Does wonders for the clarity when running AA. (try 2x AA, 8x AF)

---

Well.... I already have it at 8xAF adn 6xAA. Knocking down AA to 2x will make things better? Are you sure?

Frost, why don't you post your screens?