http://www.eetimes.com/semi/news/OEG20021017S0029
drat.. I was hoping to live on this rig until the clawhammer came out, but I don't think it's gonna happen.
Printable View
http://www.eetimes.com/semi/news/OEG20021017S0029
drat.. I was hoping to live on this rig until the clawhammer came out, but I don't think it's gonna happen.
thats a bunch of nonesense.
heres a story from today http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=5839
Weed, its impossible to know how old that roadmap is - there is no date on it. The announcement that gotmonopoly was referring to came straight from the CEO a couple of days ago. I see no reason why he'd be overly pessimistic.
We'll just have to wait and see whether there will be an early launch or perhaps another handful of delays...
Lol, that's the first time I have ever seen someone try to contradict an EE Times story with an inquirer story. I don't think there is any question as to which is the more reputable source!Quote:
Originally posted by Weedkiller420
thats a bunch of nonesense.
heres a story from today http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=5839
My thoughts exactly. Hammer is falling into a development/deployment schedule that is very similar to other 64bit chips. And that would result in volume shipments about this time next year.Quote:
Originally posted by ZhaoYun
We'll just have to wait and see whether there will be an early launch or perhaps another handful of delays...
:eek: :mad: :confused:
in a way thats good for me. gives me more time to save for a new system!
You got that right.Quote:
Originally posted by s1203372
Lol, that's the first time I have ever seen someone try to contradict an EE Times story with an inquirer story. I don't think there is any question as to which is the more reputable source!
lol I can't believe you wrote that :eek: The Inquirer deals in rumors, eetimes is CONSIDERABLY more reliable. The info in the eetimes article comes from AMD’s quarterly conference call a few days ago. I discussed it with a number of people who listened to it. If you are really interested you can probably find it online and listen to it for yourself.Quote:
Originally posted by Weedkiller420
thats a bunch of nonesense.
heres a story from today http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=5839
No kidding man weedkiller perhaps the weed is killng you. The Inquirer is without a doubt one of the biggest rumor mills on the net. A nice big TRA para tu.... :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally posted by Moridin
lol I can't believe you wrote that :eek: The Inquirer deals in rumors, eetimes is CONSIDERABLY more reliable. The info in the eetimes article comes from AMD’s quarterly conference call a few days ago. I discussed it with a number of people who listened to it. If you are really interested you can probably find it online and listen to it for yourself.
The Inquirer's good for a few things. First and foremost being remote facts about products that have little known about them.
True, little else to add to that.Quote:
Originally posted by Moridin
lol I can't believe you wrote that :eek: The Inquirer deals in rumors, eetimes is CONSIDERABLY more reliable. The info in the eetimes article comes from AMD’s quarterly conference call a few days ago. ...
The Inquirer COULD become credible if they speculated a bit less than they do and if their speculation fell right on target more often.
Chronus
meh. i don't care. i just would like to look at benchmarks. my new system isn't even here yet. it's far too early to even think about a clawhammer. i just hope that the barton core won't have a new pin lay out.
yep it will, if I remember right it was 768 pins? something like that
for the clawhammer or sledgehammer, maybe, but the barton is still a socketA CPU.Quote:
Originally posted by Trunks
yep it will, if I remember right it was 768 pins? something like that
if you look at the tom's hardware roadmap that the inquirer quotes, some of the info is pretty dated:
http://www.overclockers.com/tips00153/
Quote:
Finally, there's a roadmap over at Tom's Hardware which indicates a >3000+ Clawhammer for Q1 2003.
However, this is an outdated roadmap. For one thing, it does not indicate any 333MHz FSB processors. Nor is the TBred 2700+ there (which AMD indicated October 1 would be a mass production product; only the 2800+ is supposed to be a "limited edition product.")