-
Reef Shark
Win XP pro VS Win 2K
Apart from the new interfaces, does 2K offer anything more than XP does? I heard they were pretty similar.
- 1.5GHZ Pentium M | 768MB PC2700 | ATI Radeon 9600 pro 128MB Turbo | 60GB 7200RPM | 4X DVD+RW | 15.4" WSXGA+ | 802.11b | Logitech MX310 | XP Pro | Slackware 10
-
Resident Audiophile
From what I hear, better 3DMarks. But please don't but it because of that, hopefully you aren't a 3DMark whore.
I've been using 2K Pro on my 4 machines for over a year, and not one single problem. I highly recommend it
-
Hammerhead Shark
I believe 2k is more stable than xp...
However, if you want eye candy and multimedia enthusiastic I recommend XP...
actually XP not that far behind 2k as far as the stability goes...
and it has more feature build in...that is why I use xp rather than 2k...
Computer Maniac
Current System:
Intel Core 2 Duo Q9550 @ 3.83Ghz with Zalman CNP9700TN, 8G OCZ Reaper PC2-8500 HPC, ASUS P5Q Deluxe, AMD HD4870, Soundblaster X-FI Extreme Music, Duo OCZ Vertex 60G (RAID 0), 500G Seagate SATA, LG 20x DVD burner, Samsung 20x DVD burner, Antec 900 w/Antec Trio 650W PSU, Dell 2408FPW LCD, Logitech Z5500 5.1 Speaker, Logitech G5 w/G15 keyboard
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate RTM 64bit
3DMark 2003 = 41732
3DMark 2005 = 22648
3DMark 2006 = 16148
-
Resident Audiophile
Originally posted by ComputerManiacs
I believe 2k is more stable than xp...
However, if you want eye candy and multimedia enthusiastic I recommend XP...
actually XP not that far behind 2k as far as the stability goes...
and it has more feature build in...that is why I use xp rather than 2k...
Computer Maniac
So apparently you choose "extra features" over stability.
-
Reef Shark
Win XP has better gaming support, right?
- 1.5GHZ Pentium M | 768MB PC2700 | ATI Radeon 9600 pro 128MB Turbo | 60GB 7200RPM | 4X DVD+RW | 15.4" WSXGA+ | 802.11b | Logitech MX310 | XP Pro | Slackware 10
-
Evil Monkey Shark
Originally posted by barton boi
Win XP has better gaming support, right?
supposedly....2k might have more issues running old games when compared to XP, because XP utilizes a slightly better compatibility mode...however, the only game i've ever come across that works on xp but not 2k is Need For Speed High Stakes (NFS4). IMO, the "better gaming support" claim is pretty weak
Abit IP35 Pro - Core2Duo E8400 - 4GB Crucial Ballistix 1066 - ATI 4850HD
- 2xRaptor 150GB RAID-0
Dave? Dave?! Dave's not here...
-
Resident Audiophile
Yeah, I agree, especially when 2K is supposed to get better 3DMarks
-
Tiger Shark
well from my experience on my computer xp did not like any of my hardware, like my motherbaord, ati tv card. and is just a pain to get the sound working. where as when i installed 2000 it just breazzed right on through. as did linux, but i had to get a few things for sound . and my mouse for the wheel but i like it anyways.
-
Crash Test Dummy
In my experience, they're equally stable. XP has the eye candy and a few more features like Remote Desktop and built-in wireless support.
-
The Medieval Mod
whatever you get cheaper. Both are great windows OS
"Est Solarus Oth Mithas"
My Honor is My Life
(\__/)
(='.'=)This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(")signature to help him gain world domination
-
Hammerhead Shark
Originally posted by freedonX
whatever you get cheaper. Both are great windows OS
Exactly.
-
xp vrs. win2k
Same-same except for the eye-candy now! Driver support for win2k is good now. It sucked when released as opposed to xp which had good driver support when released. It takes longer to boot uo win2k. I likem both. Win2k for work, xp for play.
Last edited by python134r; 10-12-2003 at 10:59 PM.
X3210 @3.6ghz/AC Freezer Pro
P5K Premium/WiFi/4x1Gb GSkill
ATI Sapphire Vapor-X 4890
2x640Gb WD Black Hdd Raid0/WD 74Gb Raptor
Creative SoundBlaster X-Fi Fatality Extreme Gamer
Lian Li Pc-7B plusII/PC Power and Cooling 850 SSI Turbo
Logitech Z-5500 5.1 speaker system
Samsung SH-223F DVD Burner
-
Registered User
I had more problems with older games with 2000 pro than with xp so I stuck with xp pro; dumb me I still have a 10 gig 98se partition for those same games and they work on xp pro as well but never did on 2000.
-
ATI Fanboy
That's why I ahve a dual-boot setup for both XP and 2k
.:|:. Thermaltake Xaser II A5000A Case
.:|:. OCZ PowerStream 470W PSU
.:|:. Chaintech VNF3-250 nForce3 250
.:|:. AMD64 3000+ 2.0Ghz @ 2410Mhz
.:|:. Zalman CNPS7000-Cu Copper HSF
.:|:. OCZ 1GB PC-3500 EB Platinum Edition @ 240Mhz 3-2-2-10 (2.9V)
.:|:. ATI Radeon x800 Pro 256MB @ 530Mhz/560Mhz
.:|:. Creative Audigy 2 ZS
.:|:. Klipsch Promedia 5.1 Ultras
3DMark01 - 25617
Join Fix-it.org Forums!
-
Sleeps with the Fishes
I use XP Pro but use the windows classic layout. IMO the differences in stability between the two operating systems are so completely minimal that it's basically whatever you can get cheaper.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|