-
Mako Shark
Preferred music player?
What's your preferred music player?
We all know how WinDVD is know for it's great playing DVDs, but i've been using it lately and (because of its sound quality) I've found it to be my preferred music player (I use trusorround xt enabled).
I'm currently using WinDVD 5 Platinum.
Any thoughts on other players?
-
remember me?
Winamp. Keep it simple.
-
i use itunes . not alot of work involved, I find it does everything for audio i wqnt
A silent computer is a dead one..
-
Hammerhead Shark
winamp -- it kicks the llama's @ss. and xmms in linux (winamp clone).
workstation: athlon xp-m 2400+@2.4Ghz | epox 8rda+ | 512mb | seagate 80gb+160gb | arch linux
web server: athlon xp 1600+ | epox 8k3a+ | 256mb | maxtor 30gb | debian linux
-
Zoom-Zoom!
Foobar2000. Focuses on sound quality, not visual effects.
-
Chomp Chomp
i tried it a few weeks back, and i couldn't notice a difference in quality. maybe i am doing something wrong.
c2d e6600, gigabyte ga-965p-ds3 3.3, x1950pro, 3gb ddr2 800
-
Resident Audiophile
Winamp5 Beta for my speakers, and Foobar for the 212's
-
Chomp Chomp
oh yea. winamp 2.91, it's the easiest to use, and it's the fastest.
Last edited by PinchyCM; 10-29-2003 at 12:56 PM.
c2d e6600, gigabyte ga-965p-ds3 3.3, x1950pro, 3gb ddr2 800
-
Mako Shark
winamp (not 3), foobar2000, xmms, and itunes are some of my favorites.
-
Zoom-Zoom!
Originally posted by PinchyCM
oh yea. winamp 2.91, it's the easiest to use, and it's the fastest.
You must try this with winamp2.91, Pinchy. It's a decoder plugin, and there should be a noticeble difference in the highs. (link is at the bottom right)
http://www.mars.org/home/rob/proj/mpeg/mad-plugin/
-
Resident Audiophile
Where do you guys get skins for Winamp 2.91?
-
Hammerhead Shark
there is absolutely no difference in quality of playback between winamp/foobar/mad plugin. they are all reference mp3 decoders, the is no difference at all. your fooling yourself.
P4 2.4C @ 3.3Ghz 275FSB 1.62v|Abit IC7-G|2x512MB Corsair PC3500 @ 440mhz 2-3-2-6|Saphire Radeon 9800 PRO 128MB|SLK-900u w/ 90mm Enermax adjustable fan|Hitachi DeskStar 180GXP 120GB w/8MB Cache|Antec TruePower 430w|SB Audigy 2|Klipsch PM v.2-400 w/SWS|Logitech MX510|Trinitron 21"
HTPC:
P4 2.8C(stock)|Abit IS7|2x512mb Corsair PC3200|MSI Geforce4 4200 128mb|2x180gb Hitachi 180gxp|SB Audigy 2 zs|Klipsch PM 5.1 Ultras|NetGear 802.11g Wi-Fi|Hauppauge PVR-250|Logitech cordless desktop MX for bluetooth (mx900)|Enermax 350w|ATI Remote Wonder
Old Faithfull:
P3 1ghz @ 1.1 147fsb|Asus CUSL2-C|512MB Crucial CAS2 PC133|Creative Geforce2 GTS 32MB|IBM DeskStar 60GXP 60GB|SB LIVE! 5.1|Creative Desktop Theater 5.1|Enlight 300w PSU
-
There is *LITTLE* difference, but there is a difference there.
Its pretty ignorant to claim that there is no difference between 16 bit and 24bit audio streams. Many people have heard the difference.
I myself have heard little if no change... but it could be my soundcard. And for your info - foobar sounds better to me than winamp2,3 or 5 beta.
-
Chomp Chomp
Originally posted by XP18004life
Where do you guys get skins for Winamp 2.91?
winamp.com, check the top right hand corner.
c2d e6600, gigabyte ga-965p-ds3 3.3, x1950pro, 3gb ddr2 800
-
RIP SiS :(
CoolPlayer with Cool Wave Mapper. I always thought it sounded smoother and less harsh than Foobar.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|