Preferred music player? - Page 4

Sharky Forums


Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 88

Thread: Preferred music player?

  1. #46
    Hammerhead Shark serotone9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    ny
    Posts
    2,545
    Originally posted by XP18004life
    Groove Salad? I remember hearing this is a film starring Jenna Jameson
    that sounds about right for the name of one of her films.

    but no, this *other* groove salad is very addictive internet streaming audio, if you like their kind of stuff. it makes great background music.
    workstation: athlon xp-m 2400+@2.4Ghz | epox 8rda+ | 512mb | seagate 80gb+160gb | arch linux
    web server: athlon xp 1600+ | epox 8k3a+ | 256mb | maxtor 30gb | debian linux

  2. #47
    Tiger Shark
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Vancouver , BC
    Posts
    639
    "To stir the pot, I found that "enhancer" to be nothing more than a volume/frequency booster. You can get the same results but boosting the treble and bass levels in windows...imho."

    I concur with soupnazi. This plugin does nothing but boost a set of frequencies, lets call it the B0$E effect. Newbies will often fall for its false sound.


    As for you natgun, stop being so ignorant. If your ears cant tell the difference, fine - dont be a baby and claim there is no difference. It may be very slight or non-existant in some cases, but I guarantee you its probably your settings or the way you have it setup. Go look in the soundcard section in the 3dss.com forum if you need to read the dozens of people that all agree there is a difference in quality albeit slight...

  3. #48
    Zoom-Zoom! soupnazi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    15,097
    Swerv has entered the building.
    Spoiler

  4. #49
    Resident Audiophile XP1800's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    8,612
    After playing with that pluging some more, I know agree with Swerv and Soupnazi. I just went back to the good ole EQ settings in Winamp

    Using onboard really makes me miss the options I had with my old sound card, I can't wait to get that A2

  5. #50
    Chomp Chomp PinchyCM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    6,644
    it's good stuff, i listen to it while studying or programming.
    c2d e6600, gigabyte ga-965p-ds3 3.3, x1950pro, 3gb ddr2 800

  6. #51
    Chomp Chomp PinchyCM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    6,644
    Originally posted by XP18004life
    After playing with that pluging some more, I know agree with Swerv and Soupnazi. I just went back to the good ole EQ settings in Winamp

    Using onboard really makes me miss the options I had with my old sound card, I can't wait to get that A2
    i think the rock preset on is quite good.
    c2d e6600, gigabyte ga-965p-ds3 3.3, x1950pro, 3gb ddr2 800

  7. #52
    Resident Audiophile XP1800's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    8,612
    Originally posted by PinchyCM
    i think the rock preset on is quite good.
    Wow, I use the same one!

    It's either that one or I use the bass and treble setting

  8. #53
    Not Pirate... Arrrchiver Mr Cherry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    By the Beach in California
    Posts
    8,090
    Glad I could help you guys, it's a Digital Signal Processor and I think it does an adequate job. I prefer the Normal (Ambience) preset myself. Did you guys notice how it controls the volume so your songs stay in a certain decibal range? Pretty cool I think.
    ---> : : : computer specs : : : <---
    :::heatware:::


    Currently playing: World of Warcraft [Lightbringer Realm]

    ''Ah ha ha ha ha ha! Sixty seconds till midnight…sixty seconds to nowhere, baby! You have all become victims of the Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs… Hey! Pay Attention!"


    update: 2/28/08

  9. #54
    Zoom-Zoom! soupnazi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    15,097
    Originally posted by Mr Cherry
    Did you guys notice how it controls the volume so your songs stay in a certain decibal range? Pretty cool I think.
    I was wondering what that was doing. It was ticking me off. j/k
    Spoiler

  10. #55
    Mako Shark coolqf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    New York, NY, US
    Posts
    3,495
    Anyone use MediaSource? I'm at work right no, but earlier today I found that it played songs better than Winanmp 2.95 with the MAD plugin installed (and running at 24bit).
    (I was using MediaSource 2 to be exact)

  11. #56
    Chomp Chomp PinchyCM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    6,644
    not exactly which plugin to look for. can someone link me?
    c2d e6600, gigabyte ga-965p-ds3 3.3, x1950pro, 3gb ddr2 800

  12. #57
    remember me? number1sixerfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,578
    Sorry soup, but I still don't like foobar.

  13. #58
    Zoom-Zoom! soupnazi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    15,097
    It's an acquired taste, like pizza. j/k
    Spoiler

  14. #59
    Not Pirate... Arrrchiver Mr Cherry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    By the Beach in California
    Posts
    8,090
    Originally posted by soupnazi
    It's an acquired taste, like pizza. j/k
    All sound is subjective, it differs from person to person. If it sounds good to you go with it.
    ---> : : : computer specs : : : <---
    :::heatware:::


    Currently playing: World of Warcraft [Lightbringer Realm]

    ''Ah ha ha ha ha ha! Sixty seconds till midnight…sixty seconds to nowhere, baby! You have all become victims of the Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs… Hey! Pay Attention!"


    update: 2/28/08

  15. #60
    RIP SiS :( CrawlingEye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Easton, Pa, USA
    Posts
    7,441
    Originally posted by Mr Cherry
    All sound is subjective, it differs from person to person. If it sounds good to you go with it.
    Yes, but an objective look can be formed from common opinions on 'good sounds.'

    If you think about it, who wants a harsh and distorted sound? No one.

    I find that Winamp distorts in this manner, while foobar is much clearer and cleaner sounding. The problem with foobar is that it seems to be a bit harsh at times and almost makes the overall sound seem choppy.

    On the other hand, I find CoolPlayer being my current favorite, as it's very articulate yet quite smooth and musical.

    This is subjective about CoolPlayer, but that's my personal findings.
    I used winamp 2.90 with the MAD plugin for my comparison, as well.
    -mark

    OC Crusader
    Sigma Dir CrawlingEye of the Cooler's Guild
    SharkyExtreme.com 3D Mark Team


    Samsung SM348
    Asus P4S533
    Pentium 4 2.26b
    Samsung pc2700 512MB
    Seagate Barracuda IV 40gig 7200RPM
    ATi Radeon 9700 Pro
    Audigy 2
    Leadtek WinFast TV 2000 XP
    Antec pp412x
    Cambridge Megaworks THX 550
    Sennheiser HD212 Pro
    Sennheiser mx300
    Ultrasone HFI 650 Trackmaster
    Rio Karma


    3D Mark 2001SE Compare: 14707
    3D Mark 2003 Compare: 4550

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •