KT400 vs. KT333

Sharky Forums


Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: KT400 vs. KT333

  1. #1
    Hammerhead Shark punkrawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    sd,ca,usa
    Posts
    1,237

    KT400 vs. KT333

    Why does the via kt400 chipset suck so much??? i look over on toms hardware and i mean kt333 kicks the **** out of kt400 in some benchmarks, and its an older chipset!!! thats why ive been leaning towards getting a mobo with a kt333 chipset, 'cause i mean its a lot cheaper, more performance, and only maybe one or two less features, right?

    EDIT>>> what the hell's with this new swear filter. now it gets the words @$$ and S#!+ too? it fricking censored my profile msg! when did this change happen?
    Last edited by punkrawk; 10-13-2002 at 06:54 PM.
    Specs:
    Hercules Prophetview 920 17" LCD of *** kicking
    WIN XP Pro of *** kicking
    P3 733 @ 792
    384 MB Crucial CAS 3 RAM
    Geforce 4 4200 64 MB of *** kicking
    Lite-On 48x12x48 CDRW of *** kicking thanks so some firmware updates
    SB LIVE! Value
    Altec Lansing ACS 54W
    Soyo 7KCA+ or something like that

  2. #2
    Mako Shark fbs1992's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    West Lafayette, Indiana
    Posts
    4,443
    what the **** are you talkin about

    I really dont know why. i would guess that since there is no official ram support, and the fact that cpus are still way behind only at 133mhz that makes them perform so poorly, it could also be the fact that the boards that they reviewed were pretty early and a lot of the times they use slower memory timings for the ddr memory
    Samsung 204T
    Athlon64X2 4400+
    2gb corsair xms
    dfi lanparty (1.375v fixed ram issues)
    bfgtech 7800gt
    74gb raptor
    160gb wd
    lianli case
    .....im sold on the whole dual core thing


    DETROIT BASKETBALL!!!!!

    Boilermaker class of 2008

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •