Low 3dmark score? use win 2k - Page 3

Sharky Forums


Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 36 of 36

Thread: Low 3dmark score? use win 2k

  1. #31
    Catfish Jeff7477's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    145
    Originally posted by lostlilchild6
    It's just that from what HE says... you dont know what your doing. Of course I didnt believe him at first, but after seeing some of your posts here... it's like.. "heh... guess birdy was right".
    I would like you to explain that....

  2. #32
    Originally posted by Jeff7477


    I would like you to explain that....

    PM sent...
    -Core i7 [email protected] (H2o)
    -ASUS Rampage III Formula
    -Radeon HD6990 (950/1350) (H2o)
    -24GB Vengeance@1760 (9-10-9-28-1T)
    -(2x) OCZ Vertex LE 100GB (raid 0)
    -(2x) 2TB WD Black
    -X-Fi Fatal1ty Pro
    -Corsair HX1000
    -Corsair 800D

  3. #33
    Hammerhead Shark Deathjag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Vancouver,BC,Canada
    Posts
    1,053

    Re: Re: Re: Low 3dmark score? use win 2k

    Originally posted by Ignitionator


    He claims he's 21...
    To stupid, try 6.
    AMD Athlon 1.2 GHz @ 1.3Ghz
    ATI Radeon VIVO 64 mb DDR 206/412
    256mb of Nanya Engineering Sample PC2700 DDR
    Asus A7A266
    Nikao Zeus Case
    Creative Labs Audigy Gamer 5.1
    LabTec Pulse 424 2.1
    Pioneer 105s
    Lite-On 24x/10x/48x CD-RW
    Optiquest Q-95 ver 2.0
    Microsoft Internet Keyboard
    A-Open Optical Mouse
    Windows 98 Second Edition
    3dmark 2001 Score 3993


    Help me jeebus!!! Help me!!!

  4. #34
    My vision is improving! Thunderbird1GHz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Next to my computer :)
    Posts
    9,006
    I wouldnt disable all my other hardware
    because they arent in use when benchmarking. why disable audio, usb, your modem, etc? they arent in use so itll do nothing. I remember my score didnt change when I installed those audio drivers. Just dont run several programs in the background, such as antivirus. Maybe he needs to set agp aperature to 128mb and set his ram to agressive timings. His nature score is normal, which is proof its not a driver problem, but his car chase is low which means a cpu problem. he gets 18500 at max oc of his. If he can get windows 2k working right which he has given up and went back to windows XP. He doesnt care that much really. also in high res he will beat you in games or in games that are very video dependant but on the cpu side, its about 20% slower than yours. in my opinion, he should have gotten a radeon9700 non pro because a fast card doesnt really "sweat" on a system that makes the card idle while the cpu "sweats"
    3000+ Venice with a top overclock of 2.45GHz at 1.52v
    Retired from 3dmark! My top score shown.(with winny)
    9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821
    Click here to view my other scores!
    Sharky Extreme 3dmark team
    How well does my rig perform in games? Performance figures with fps to come!
    *********************************
    My own message board to talk all about vision
    *********************************

    Originally posted by cookie
    Woah, Tbird is right..
    Originally posted by Spaceman Spiff
    This feels so weird to say, but.......I....I...agree(with tbird)...!

  5. #35
    Catfish Jeff7477's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    145
    I got the 9800 pro becuase 1. I like FSAA and AF, 2. im an upgrade whore, which leads into 3. a new CPU(intel system) is going to be next. So naturally....I had the dough so I bought it. I don't regret it at all.

  6. #36
    My vision is improving! Thunderbird1GHz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Next to my computer :)
    Posts
    9,006
    1. the 9700 non pro is gonna be just as fast on your computer, even with fsaa
    2. me too, I spent so much money, $18 for a tbird, $30 for a pally and now $76 for a tbred but im stopping there, 2GHz is plenty
    I might spend on cooling.
    3. Intel is way overpriced in my opinion, granted they have faster cpus, the 2.8c is like $300! I dont care if its a "little" faster, I wouldnt care if I got 70fps instead of 60.
    4. I do not use fsaa and I do not yet need directX9. fsaa is almost free on radeon9500s and up but I run high res instead.
    5. even if I had the money, it would go towards a car, house and investments There is no point in buying somethings thats overkill
    3000+ Venice with a top overclock of 2.45GHz at 1.52v
    Retired from 3dmark! My top score shown.(with winny)
    9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821
    Click here to view my other scores!
    Sharky Extreme 3dmark team
    How well does my rig perform in games? Performance figures with fps to come!
    *********************************
    My own message board to talk all about vision
    *********************************

    Originally posted by cookie
    Woah, Tbird is right..
    Originally posted by Spaceman Spiff
    This feels so weird to say, but.......I....I...agree(with tbird)...!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •